Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Maniac4j

Channel

Maniac4j

@maniac4j

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

87subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001630754549
TypeChannel
Username@maniac4j
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/maniac4j

Growth

868786.59 August 2026 — 87 subscribers9 August 2026 — 87 subscribers18 August 2026 — 86 subscribers25 August 2026 — 87 subscribers9 August 202625 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 15 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 86–87 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 04:1687+1
18 Aug 2026, 04:5386-1
9 Aug 2026, 20:3087no change
9 Aug 2026, 20:1787first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 July 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

77 reactions across 17 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3849.4%
🔥1316.9%
💯79.09%
👏67.79%
🎉56.49%
🤔56.49%
🤯33.90%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 77reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2025 to 10 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Jul 2026, 21:18 UTC85 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

#OOP_USE_CASE Boshqa jamoalarga qaramlikni kamaytirib, murakkab integratsiyalarni qanday amalga oshirish mumkin? (2-qism) 1. Qat'iy Shartnoma (GsiFace.java) auth-service tizimining qolgan qismi bu yangi jarayonning murakkabligini sezmasligi uchun u yagona interfeys ortiga yashiriladi. U faqat startSession va proxyGci kabi metodga ega. Barcha himoya qatlamlari, validatsiya va proksi mantiqlari interfeysning ichkaris

👍2🔥2

10 Jul 2026, 21:15 UTC72 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

#OOP_USE_CASE Boshqa jamoalarga qaramlikni kamaytirib, murakkab integratsiyalarni qanday amalga oshirish mumkin? (1-qism) Yuzni davlat bazasidagi pasport rasmi bilan solishtiruvchi Face ID kabi tizimlarni integratsiya qilish ko'p uchraydi. Misoldagi integratsiya shunchaki oddiy API so'rov emas - u o'z ichiga mobil ilova ichida ochiladigan veb-sahifa (WebView), uzluksiz video-oqim va kuchli shifrlangan tarmoq kanall

👏2

3 Jul 2026, 01:57 UTC871 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Dasturlash, matematika va OOP Odatda matematika faqat murakkab algoritmlar uchun kerak deb o'ylashadi. Dasturlash uchun nega matematika kerakligini boshqacha nazar bilan bilib olaylik. Batafsil maqolada o'qishingiz mumkin👇 https://publink.uz/technology/8874909-dasturlash-matematika-va-oop-biz-qanday-qilib

👏2👍1

2 Jul 2026, 18:39 UTC116 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Dasturlash, matematika va OOP: Dasturlash uchun matematika kerakmi? Dasturlashni endi boshlayotganlarni sevimli savoli bor: "Dasturlash uchun matematika kerakmi?" Bunga odatda: "Yo'q, kerak emas! if/else yozishni bilsang bo'ldi, qiyin algoritmlarni aqllilar allaqachon yozib kutubxonalarga joylab qo'yishgan. Ularni chaqirib ishlataverasan" deb javob beramiz. Lekin aynan shu "matematika kerak emas" degan yolg'on sabab

🔥2🤯1

30 Jun 2026, 16:04 UTC91 viewsread 9 August 2026
Poll

OOP nimaligini tushunishimiz uchun qaysi biri qulayroq 👇

  1. Use case misollar35%
  2. Real loyiha43%
  3. Video dars16%
  4. Kerak emas, protsedural kod yozaveramiz5%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

28 Jun 2026, 19:36 UTC627 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Protsedural OOP illyuziyasi: Kodimiz nima uchun aslida obyektga yo'naltirilmagan? Batafsilroq maqolada oʻqishingiz mumkin 👇 https://publink.uz/technology/6772444-protsedural-oop-illyuziyasi-kodimiz-nima-uchun

👍2🔥1

27 Jun 2026, 08:52 UTC548 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

O'zgarmaslik (Immutability) - Intervyudagi yolg'on Dasturlashda qiziq paradoks bor: intervyuda hammamiz "Immutable (o'zgarmas) obyekt qanday yoziladi?" degan savolga to'tiqushdek javob beramiz. "Fieldlar final bo'ladi, setter bo'lmaydi..." deymiz-da, ishga kirgan birinchi kunimizdayoq class ustiga @Data (Lombok) yopishtirib (Javada), hamma yog'ini ochiq qilib tashlaymiz! 😅 Nega o'rganganimizni real loyihada ishlatm

👍3🔥1

23 Jun 2026, 04:16 UTC840 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Kostyum kiygan funksiyalar Obyektlarimizni yopdik, ma'lumotlarini yashirdik. Lekin loyihaga qarasak: hamma joyda UserService, OrderManager, FileProcessor, DateUtils... Agar haqiqiy OOP da har bir obyekt o'z ishini o'zi bajarsa, unda bu "tepadan kelib boshqaradigan" Manager'larga nima hojat bor? Manager, Processor, Controller, Service, Utils - bunaqa klasslar deyarli barchasi asli obyekt emas! Ular klasslari ichiga

👍4👏1

20 Jun 2026, 06:48 UTC647 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Getter va Setter - Inkapsulyatsiyaning qotillari Kitoblar va kurslarda bizga OOP ning muqaddas qoidasi - Inkapsulyatsiya ni o'rgatishgan. Ya'ni, obyekt o'z ichki holatini va qanday tuzilganini tashqaridan yashirishi shart. Biz nazariyani zo'r eshitamiz-da, amaliyotda nima qilamiz? Class ochib, ichiga 5-6 ta private o'zgaruvchi yozamiz. Keyin darhol getter/setter qo'shamiz. Zo'r-a? Uyni qulfladik-da, kalitini eshikn

👍5🤯2🔥1

15 Jun 2026, 01:08 UTC141 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

"So'rama, Buyur!" (Tell, Don't Ask) Xo'sh, bu bechora obyektlarga miyasini qanday qaytarib beramiz? Javob bitta: ularga o'z ishining ustasi bo'lgan mutaxassis kabi munosabatda bo'lish kerak. Keling, misol keltiramiz. Aytaylik, itingizni sayrga olib chiqmoqchisiz. Nima qilasiz? Uning 4 ta oyog'ini bittalab so'rab olib (it.getOyoqlar()), ularni o'zingiz oldinga-orqaga harakatlantirasizmi? Yo'q, jinni bo'lmagan bo'lsa

🔥2👏1

9 Jun 2026, 16:48 UTC749 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Dasturlarimiz nega "kamqonlik" kasaliga chalingan? Dasturchilar sifatida hammamiz bir ommaviy "kasallik"ka chalinganmiz. Bu arxitekturada Anemic Domain Model (Kamqon domen modeli) deb ataladi. Bitta User yoki Order class ochamiz. Ichiga 5-10 ta o'zgaruvchi (field) yozamiz. Keyin hammasiga Getter va Setter generatsiya qilamiz. Bo'ldi, vazifa bajarildi, "OOP yozdim" deb ko'nglimiz to'q bo'ladi. Lekin aslida nima qil

🤔2🔥1

7 Jun 2026, 00:15 UTC142 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Biz hech qachon "Sof OOP" yozmaganmiz! Industriyadagi eng katta yolg'onlardan biri shuki, biz o'zimizni "Obyektga yo'naltirilgan dasturlash" (OOP) yozyapmiz deb ovutamiz. Lekin haqiqatga tik boqsak dasturchilarning mutlaq ko'pchiligi "OOP" nimaligini to'liq anglamaydi, bunga ehtiyoj ham sezmaydi. Biz yillar davomida an'anaviy protsedural kod yozish bilan shug'ullanib kelyapmiz. C yoki Pascal davridagi global funksi

🤔3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @maniac4j. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Jun 2026, 16:04 UTCAnonymous Poll37 voters

OOP nimaligini tushunishimiz uchun qaysi biri qulayroq 👇

  1. Use case misollar35%
  2. Real loyiha43%
  3. Video dars16%
  4. Kerak emas, protsedural kod yozaveramiz5%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

29 Jan 2026, 18:01 UTCAnonymous Poll41 voters

Hamma joyni Startup va AI mavzusi bosib ketdi. Mavzudan chalg’ib juda qiziq bir narsa haqida kichikroq maqola yozmoqchiman. AI va uncha muncha Startupdan ko’ra jiddiyroq. Lekin uzun narsani kim ham o’qirdi deb yozgim kelmayapti))

  1. Yoz83%
  2. Yozma17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2025 to 10 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 136,920 of 1,624,904entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Maniac4j” (@maniac4j), 87 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/maniac4j.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.