Channel
@mangmang_editorial
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
838subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001566065626 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mangmang_editorial |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mangmang_editorial |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 17:21 | 838 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:44 | 839 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:27 | 840 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:37 | 841 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:20 | 842 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:54 | 842 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 15 October 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
70 reactions across 6 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 46 | 65.7% | |
| 👍 | 12 | 17.1% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 5.71% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 5.71% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 4.29% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 1.43% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 70 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 15 October 2023 to 15 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 10 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
亲爱的莽莽读者们： 感谢大家一直以来对莽莽杂志的支持与关注！我们在此告知大家，今后将停止在Telegram上的内容更新。如果您希望继续跟随我们的最新动态，请关注我们的其他平台： 官网： www.mangmang.run 阅读主页： read.mangmang.run Instagram：@mangmang_editorial X：@MM_editorial 再次感谢大家的支持，我们期待在其他平台上与您相见！ 莽莽杂志团队 ———————————————————————— 我们真诚期待您的捐助、订阅、互动、投稿，帮助《莽莽》继续在野蛮生长。 订阅Newsletter | 莽莽主页 | 文章阅读 | 捐助我们
❤11👎1
莽莽一周年 | 高墙内外 野蛮生长 一年前，莽莽的种子被种下。 回到2022年11月12日，我们是一群刚从柏林的亚历山大广场集会上散去的人，我们是从一部反修例抗争纪录片的放映现场走出来的人，我们是终于脱下口罩第一次看清彼此、一起去吃饭喝酒的人。 就在当晚热烈且真诚的畅聊中，我们灵光乍现：“一起来创办一本不受审查，用母语来记录和书写我们的生命的杂志吧。” 彼时，莽莽这个名字还没有诞生，但我们对书写和行动的渴望已经酝酿许久了。 一年以来，我们带着这种渴望，做出了第一本杂志，再经历外部威胁、同伴来来去去，更是收到了太多鼓舞和帮助。在此，我们想对所有支持《莽莽》的人道谢，并向路过、停留过这片莽原的朋友们致以问候。 《莽莽》仍在野蛮生长，并且，它也期待着你的到来。 ———————————————————————— 我们真诚期待您的捐助、订阅、互动、投稿，帮助《莽莽》继续在野蛮生长。 订阅Newsletter | 莽莽主页 …
❤31👎3😁3👍2
离散时代 | 一个新的“我们” 这是“离散时代”专题的第三篇文章，它来自一位柏林社群行动者“秦晓洁”的投稿。作为一名典型的“留德华”，Ta从为自己起的德语名字出发，讲述了自己从赴德读语言班到大学再到工作后关于身份认同的心路历程。而当Ta参与过在柏林的勃兰登堡门举行的乌鲁木齐大火遇难者烛光悼念活动后，Ta的想法却突然发生了转变：不想再成为“融入”，不想再成为“他者”了。 作者：秦晓洁 你可以在我们的阅读平台 read.mangmang.run 浏览全文，也欢迎你在此订阅我们的Newsletter，即时接收最新文章推送。 订阅Newsletter | 莽莽主页 | 文章阅读
❤4🤡1
离散时代｜白纸之后，伦敦社群实践的三种可能性 特约作者：随便 这是“离散时代”专题的第二篇文章，内容为对三位伦敦运动社群行动者的采访，他们来自中国反贼（China Deviants）、伦敦女权开放麦（50 shades of feminism）、左翼中国学生联盟(Left Chinese Student Association)。 你可以我们的阅读平台 read.mangmang.run浏览全文，也欢迎你在此订阅我们的Newsletter，即时接收最新文章推送。 ————— 阅读/订阅，请访问 read.mangmang.run
离散时代｜黄台仰专访：最重要乃维持身份认同 (下) 这是“离散时代”专题的第一篇的文章的下篇：在德国游说。你可以在我们的阅读平台read.mangmang.run浏览全文，也欢迎在此订阅我们的Newsletter。 订阅Newsletter | 莽莽主页 | 文章阅读
👍2
离散时代｜黄台仰专访：最重要乃维持身份认同 (上) 这是“离散时代”专题的第一篇的文章，内容关于香港人身份认同、建立离散港人社群以及他在德国做游说，分为上、下两篇。黄台仰是前香港本土派人士，2018年他流亡德国，于19年正式获政治庇护。2022年他在德国成立“自由香港协会”（Freiheit für HongKong），在德国进行政治游说工作。 今天发布的为本文的上篇，下篇将在两天后（周日）推送，敬请关注。 你可以在我们的阅读平台read.mangmang.run浏览全文，也欢迎在此订阅我们的Newsletter。 订阅Newsletter | 莽莽主页 | 文章阅读
👍5🔥4
追踪莽莽 | Newsletter功能上线 很多读者向我们询问，如何更便捷、及时且安全地追踪《莽莽》杂志的最新内容。为此我们在Substack开通了阅读主页，并启用了邮箱订阅功能。 在此我们诚邀各位忠实读者订阅《莽莽》的Newsletter。你只需访问 read.mangmang.run，输入接收邮箱地址即可完成订阅，今后你将定期接收到我们的最新文章与动态。（更多详情见Q&A） （预告：近期我们即将推送多篇系列文章，敬请期待） 订阅Newsletter | 莽莽主页 | 文章阅读
👍3
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @mangmang_editorial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@mangmang_editorial named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“《莽莽》杂志” (@mangmang_editorial), 838 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mangmang_editorial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.