🎀🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 @dayeoninkarton @manelilies @vishnyaprokarton @PechaliTonutVBokale @nswer_kepsi @kpoxxus @sugarcoatty @sushatytaa @gghosttikk @cfmlbby @boringdaytedenegnacarton @bellttysani @chiescard

Channel
𝒷𝓁𝒶𝒸𝓀𝓌𝒶𝓉ℯ𝓇𝓁𝒾𝓁𝒾ℯ𝓈
@manelilies
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
37subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003996193938 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @manelilies |
| Description | shittings |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/manelilies |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:31 | 37 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:17 | 37 | first reading |
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 70.0%
- avg views ÷ 37 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 25.9
- 12 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 44.7%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 12
- of 12 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (4 August 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 311 |
| Reactions total | 109 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 21:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 90
- Videos
- 5
- Links
- 6
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 5s
- Average length
- 5s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
109 reactions across 9 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5350739440690037242 | 26 | 23.9% | |
| custom 5249064370654187952 | 24 | 22.0% | |
| custom 5235510819667599735 | 13 | 11.9% | |
| custom 5350407916459426668 | 13 | 11.9% | |
| custom 5258014597167741850 | 10 | 9.17% | |
| custom 5287714699746505206 | 8 | 7.34% | |
| custom 5348050580709347279 | 8 | 7.34% | |
| custom 5445165271650168972 | 7 | 6.42% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 109reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
а еще я купила сольник юны ice cream которая как салфетки💜 мне очень нравица концепт этого альбома 🌟🌟🌟 а еще купила я за чутка овер, но зато не нужно ждать месяц и платить за дс и учеты
custom 52490643706541879523custom 53504079164594266682custom 53507394406900372422
Sticker, posted without a caption
💜 автограф и фото с кендис!!! я очень радааа 🦋🦋 хелло подумала шо я незуко и спросила где мой танджиро🙏🏼 я сказала что я шинобу🦋девочки очень красивые и добрые 🩷 мой первый фансайн ее
custom 53507394406900372426custom 53504079164594266684custom 52877146997465052062custom 52490643706541879521
🗞Info | 260808 ITZY достигли отметки в 10 миллионов подписчиков в YouTube! ── .✦ ITZY становятся первой женской группой 4-ого поколения, достигшей этой отметки » tags:#info
custom 52355108196675997353custom 52490643706541879522custom 54451652716501689722
купила pop matt le letit prince у меня уже есть один, но захотелось еще одного в коллекциюю🦋 🦋🦋 мне кажется я за последние пару дней потратила столько денег, скока не тратила никогда🤍
custom 52490643706541879525custom 52355108196675997353custom 53480505807093472793custom 54451652716501689721
хде реакции
custom 53480505807093472792custom 52580145971677418501custom 52877146997465052061
ФИГУРКА МИКАСЫ И ПОДПИСЬ КАРИНЫ КАРАМБЕЙБИ НА НЕЙ ЭТО ПРОСТО ШИКАРНО, Я ТАК РАДА ЧТО УВИДЕЛА КАРИНУ И ВЕРОНИКУ В ЖИВУЮ ОБОЖЕЕЕ🤍
custom 53507394406900372427custom 52490643706541879526custom 52580145971677418505custom 52877146997465052062custom 53504079164594266681
🔤бновка🦋 🍹🍹🍹🍹🍹🍹 снова карта джию, очинь нравица ее картон немагууу
custom 53507394406900372425custom 52490643706541879524custom 52877146997465052063custom 52355108196675997351
🔤рочная 🔤родажа 🔤🔤🔤 •город: астана в другие города почтой •самовывоз/курьер встреч нет! •торг уместен •отзывов много, скину в лс •видео карты, фото карты с вашим ником скину •обмен на черен, ханыль, джию, юнджин(лс), ироха 🍹на подписанный альбом ifeye цену предлагаете сами(можно немного лоу) видео пруф подписей скину в лс при покупке 🍹🍹писать: @saeliich #itzy #nmixx #ifeye #kiiikiii #illit #продажа #обмен
custom 53504079164594266686custom 52490643706541879523custom 53480505807093472793custom 53507394406900372423
🌷🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🌷 🔤🍹🍹🍹🍹🍹🍹🍹🍹 🤩пополнила коллекцию карт джию наканецто, и по крутой цене взяла еще юнджин, ироху и юнитку с чоронкой. еще и на джию бесплатные учеты сделали🤍 во такой вот улов сэдня
custom 52355108196675997356custom 52580145971677418504custom 54451652716501689724custom 53507394406900372423
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @manelilies. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 780,485 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@bellttysani · 371 postYvespase
@boringdaytedenegnacarton · 571 postbby ⊹ ࣪ ˖ card archive
@cfmlbby · 121 postSun chi
@chiescard · 401 post𝜗𝜚˚⋆𝓓𝓪𝔂𝓮𝓸𝓷 𝓲𝓷 𝓴𝓪𝓻𝓽𝓸𝓷 𝜗𝜚˚⋆
@dayeoninkarton · 711 postghost bunny club
@gghosttikk · 1341 post˚₊‧꒰ა ⲡⲟⲇⲏⲉⳝⲉⲥⲏⲁя ⲕⲣⲟⲭυ ໒꒱ ‧₊˚
@kpoxxus · 631 postКепси и картон🐬
@nswer_kepsi · 1571 post🛸
@PechaliTonutVBokale · 661 postшугаркотти⁴ #SWEAT
@sugarcoatty · 1811 postРест Susha with card
@sushatytaa · 1191 postвишня жёстко про картон
@vishnyaprokarton · 2831 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝒷𝓁𝒶𝒸𝓀𝓌𝒶𝓉ℯ𝓇𝓁𝒾𝓁𝒾ℯ𝓈” (@manelilies), 37 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/manelilies.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.