Channel
@manddh
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
207subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001377182509 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @manddh |
| Description | "والروحُ تألفُ من يُماثل طُهرَها 💛. |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/manddh |
Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 39% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 5 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @BLUE4You/3494717 Feb 2026, 18:09 UTC | @manddh/20754 · this entry17 Feb 2026, 18:09 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @BLUE4You/3500723 Feb 2026, 17:12 UTC | @manddh/20755 · this entry23 Feb 2026, 17:12 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @BLUE4You/3500823 Feb 2026, 17:12 UTC | @manddh/20756 · this entry23 Feb 2026, 17:12 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @manddh/20759 · this entry25 Feb 2026, 20:59 UTC | @BLUE4You/3503425 Feb 2026, 20:59 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @manddh/20760 · this entry25 Feb 2026, 20:59 UTC | @BLUE4You/3503525 Feb 2026, 20:59 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @BLUE4You/3504826 Feb 2026, 21:08 UTC | @manddh/20763 · this entry26 Feb 2026, 21:08 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @BLUE4You | 9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @BLUE4You (7–2) |
| @Messsagess | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @Messsagess (6–0) |
| @houpKhafayA | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @houpKhafayA (4–2) |
| @SUuCCeSSplATfORM | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @SUuCCeSSplATfORM (5–0) |
| @wadalhassan10 | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (4–1) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 23 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 15 comparable posts for this entry, running 17 February 2026 to 28 July 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 6, the earliest publisher we hold is @wadalhassan10. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 5 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:47 | 207 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:18 | 207 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 15 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (15 February 2026 – 28 July 2026) |
| Views total | 4 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 03:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
انطلاقًا من إيمان منصة نجاح برسالة الكلمة، ودورها في بناء الوعي، وإثراء الفكر، واكتشاف الأصوات الأدبية الواعدة، تُعلن المنصة عن فتح باب المشاركة في مسابقة نجاح للكتابة الإبداعية، وتدعو الكتّاب والمهتمين باللغة العربية إلى تقديم أعمالهم والمنافسة في أجواء ثقافية تحتفي بالإبداع والتميّز. مجالات المشاركة: - قصة نجاح. - مقال ملهم. - تجربة شخصية. - الأدب والفنون. شروط المشاركة: - أن يكون العمل أصيلًا ومن إنتاج المشارك…
وجهتك الأولى للتنسيقات شي أن 💙 نستعرض أفضل القطع المختارة من المتاجر العالمية، مع التركيز على الجودة، التقييمات العالية، والسعر المناسب. أناقة، فخامة، وثقة... كل ما تحتاجه لتظهر بأفضل إطلالة. 👑 https://t.me/keeoo707
عزيزي القارئ إنّ القلوب لتظمأ، ولا يُروِيها إلا سِيَرُ الصالحين… وقريبًا، نفتح معًا صفحاتٍ من نور، نبدأها بسيرة خيرِ الخلق، محمد بن عبد الله ﷺ، ثم نمضي في دروب أصحابه الكرام: أبو بكر الصديق… صاحب الصدق والثبات، عمر بن الخطاب… الفاروق الذي فرّق الله به بين الحق والباطل، عثمان بن عفان… ذو الحياء والنورين، علي بن أبي طالب… باب العلم وسيف الحكمة. هي مواعظ تُحيي القلوب، ونورٌ يهدي من أراد النجاة. فكونوا على موعد… فلعلّ…
Photo, posted without a caption
روايه حوريه بقلم : محمد ياسر الفصل الأخير انتهى كل شئ قبل أن نحكي عن يوسف… دعونا نفتح بابًا لا يُرى. عالم الجن ليس أسطورة تُحكى للأطفال قبل النوم. هو عالم موازٍ… يسير بمحاذاة عالمنا، لا يرانا أغلبهم، ولا نراهم. لكن أحيانًا— تحدث تقاطعات. ليس كل الجن شريرًا. وليس كل اقتراب شيطانيًا. هناك ما يُسمّى في التراث بـ الجن العاشق… كائن يتعلّق بروح إنسان، لا لجسده فقط، بل لفكرته… لفراغه… لضعفه. والحب— حين يخرج عن حدّه— يت…
أصبح أصم لا يسمع شي فقط اسم سارة. وبدأ يبكي. ليس بكاء رجلٍ خسر حبيبته. بل بكاء إنسانٍ فقد ذاكرته… ثم قيل له إنه قاتل. الشيخ بابكر اقترب. أخذ الهاتف من يده برفق. يوسف كان ينظر إلى الفراغ. "أنا ما ممكن أكون قتلتها… صح؟" سؤال بسيط. مرعب. الشيخ لم يجب فورًا. لأن الحقيقة— أحيانًا— ليست واضحة كما نظن. ما الذي حدث؟ العقل حين يتعرض لصدمة شديدة، قد يمحو الحدث بالكامل. ليس تجاهلًا. بل حماية. إذا كان يوسف فعل شيئًا تحت انه…
وهنا… لم يعد الانهيار احتمالًا. بدأ الجنون الحقيقي. كان يردد كتعويذة: "كل العالم يكرهني." وفي طريقه المعتاد إلى الحمام — ثلاث دقائق فقط — كان دائمًا يلقي السلام. اليوم… لم يلقِ أحد عليه السلام. سمعهم يهمسون: "يوسف المجنون." المجنون. الكلمة لم تكن وصفًا. كانت حكمًا نهائيًا. وفي تلك اللحظة، اتخذ قراره. قال في نفسه: "لو ما في زول ابتسم لي في طريقي للحمام… انتهى كل شيء." محمد رآه… وغيّر طريقه. أحمد أشاح بوجهه. فارس…
في تلك الليلة رجع لغرفته. جلس وحده. سأل نفسه: هل أنا أنهار… أم أتعلم حدودي؟ المصحّة لم تكن السبب الكامل. ولا البراءة كانت الحل الكامل. يوسف بدأ يفهم حقيقة أخطر: أن الإنسان قد لا يمرض عقليًا… لكنه قد يختنق نفسيًا. وبين الجنون والانهيار مسافة رفيعة جدًا… اسمها الضغط الطويل بلا متنفس. الليل كان ساكنًا… ساكنًا زيادة عن اللزوم. الهواء ثقيل، كأن الجدران نفسها تتنفس ببطء. يوسف جلس على سريره، ظهره للحائط، رأسه منخفض. ثم……
صرخة. لم تكن من يوسف. كانت منها. حورية انكمشت. "وقف! وقف القراءة!" الشيخ لم يتوقف. صوته ازداد حضورًا. الغرفة أصبحت مشحونة… كأن الهواء يحترق. حورية بدأت ترتجف. "أنا ما طالعة! أنا بحبه! أنا ما طالعة!" يوسف سقط على ركبتيه، يمسك رأسه. الألم اشتد. الشيخ اقترب منه أكثر، ووضع يده على رأسه، يقرأ آيات الرقية كاملة، بصوت ثابت لا يرتجف: آيات الحفظ… آيات التوحيد… آيات الحرق التي تُزلزل ما لا يُرى. حورية صرخت بجنون. "أنا بتحرق!…
Photo, posted without a caption
روايه حوريه بقلم : محمد ياسر الفصل الخامس عشر « استراحة محارب » كيف تصنع الضغوط مجنونًا رسميًا؟ الإنسان لا يتحوّل فجأة. لا يستيقظ صباحًا ليجد نفسه شخصًا آخر. التحوّل يبدأ بشق صغير في الداخل… ثم يتسع. يوسف لم يكن ضعيفًا. كان يحب الحياة بطريقة واضحة، بسيطة، خالية من التعقيد. يضحك من قلبه. يمشي بخطوات خفيفة. يحلم بمستقبل عادي… بيت، حب، دفء. لكن الضغوط لا تأتي دفعة واحدة. هي لا تطرق الباب. هي تتسلل. أولًا… صدمة. ثم س…
جلس يوسف معه أول مرة صدفة. ثم صار يقصده كل يوم. أبو بكر كان يقرأ القرآن بصوت منخفض، صوت فيه خشوع بلا استعراض. قال له يومًا: "يا يوسف… علاج الجنون ما بس حبوب. علاج الجنون إنك ترجع تعرف نفسك قدام ربك." يوسف لم يجادله. كان يستمع. بدأ يجلس معه بعد المغرب. يسمع التلاوة. أحيانًا يقرأ. أحيانًا يغلق عينيه فقط. لم يكن يبحث عن معجزة. كان يبحث عن سكون. شيئًا فشيئًا صار يومه واضحًا: جلسة علاج صباحية. شاي مع خالد. حديث غامض مع س…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @manddh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 938,977 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐅𝐋𝐀𝐕𝐀 💛.” (@manddh), 207 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/manddh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.