Управляющий состав pinned a photo

Channel
Управляющий состав
@managstaff
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,985subscribers
-22 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002027762259 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @managstaff |
| Description | Про управление и достижение целей. Вопросы к @TrainManage_bot Менеджер @Andrew_Ovchinikov Купить рекламу можно ещё тут: https://telega.in/c/managstaff |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 24 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 1 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/managstaff |
Topic
Job listings — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Nov 2026, 11:56 | 7,985 | -6 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 13:29 | 7,991 | -6 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 08:04 | 7,997 | -7 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 13:16 | 8,004 | -4 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 19:21 | 8,008 | -7 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 01:41 | 8,015 | -13 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 04:47 | 8,028 | +49 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 12:26 | 7,979 | -26 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 13:56 | 8,005 | -2 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 10:58 | 8,007 | +68 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 21:58 | 7,939 | -13 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 20:16 | 7,952 | -16 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 06:35 | 7,968 | -11 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 20:18 | 7,979 | -11 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:14 | 7,990 | -7 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:27 | 7,997 | +15 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 21:36 | 7,982 | +4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 19:18 | 7,978 | -6 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 03:37 | 7,984 | -7 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:52 | 7,991 | first reading |
Engagement
57 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 29.9%
- avg views ÷ 7,985 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,390
- 18 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.312%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 19
- of 57 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 57 (12 July 2026 – 2 November 2026) |
| Views total | 42,970 |
| Reactions total | 119 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Nov 2026, 11:29 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 13
- Links
- 12
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
460 reactions across 40 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 280 | 60.9% | |
| 🔥 | 132 | 28.7% | |
| ❤ | 41 | 8.91% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 1.52% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 57 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 460 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 2 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 10.5%
- 6 of 57 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 6
- posts carrying an erid · 6 distinct tokens
- Median views · ads
- 2,270
- over 6 measured posts
- Median views · rest
- 2,470
- over 50 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2SDnjcPeJWF | 1 | 7 August 2026 | 7 August 2026 |
| 2VSb5wDbLj4 | 1 | 20 August 2026 | 20 August 2026 |
| 2W5zFGNvvoj | 1 | 8 October 2026 | 8 October 2026 |
| 2W5zFHjSY1X | 1 | 26 August 2026 | 26 August 2026 |
| CQH36pWzJqCL8Lmvss1964ojd4Zmc3zxEWduz5ut3pStsW | 1 | 21 October 2026 | 21 October 2026 |
| CQH36pWzJqCL8Lmvw5kNMpKGXAwRBT7GzztqSxwJA6GETE | 1 | 28 October 2026 | 28 October 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 2 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Какие задачи руководитель уже может делегировать ИИ-агентам 🤖 Свести данные к планерке, разобрать запись встречи, подготовить документ, ответить на повторяющиеся вопросы клиентов. Такая работа съедает время и руководителя, и команды. Часть этой рутины можно (и давно пора!) поручить ИИ-агенту: описать задачу, передать исходные материалы и проверить результат. ☝🏻03-05 ноября пройдет бесплатный марафон по ИИ-агентам …
👍2
Наноэкономия Вы наверняка слышали фразу "копейка рубль бережет". В сложные времена она актуальна как никогда! Наноэкономия это не про урезание зарплат, а про разумное использование ресурсов и осознанный подход к тратам на каждом уровне. Что это значит на практике? • Бережливое отношение к расходным материалам: Экономим бумагу, картриджи, канцелярию. • Оптимизация использования электроэнергии: Выключаем свет и комп…
👍7🔥5
Вы наняли руководителей, но разгребать всё равно вам. Один не выполнил договорённость. Второй не справился с задачей. Третий приходит с вопросом: «А что мне делать?» И вы снова решаете за всех. Договариваетесь, подстраховываете, додумываете за сотрудников. Работа пошла. Ваша — встала. «Я работала как белка в колесе, мне кажется, сутками». Так описывала свою жизнь Елена Мамаева, собственница коррекционного детско…
❤1👍1
Как сквозная аналитика убивает проекты Как руководитель, я обожаю данные. Сквозная аналитика для меня – это как рентген для организма проекта: видно все, где болит, где растет. Но, как и с рентгеном, без квалифицированного врача можно увидеть что-то не то и поставить неверный диагноз Давайте начистоту: сквозная аналитика – это не серебряная пуля. В своей практике я видел, как проекты, вооруженные по последнему слову…
❤6👍6
Как мотивировать обучаться разные поколения? Вопрос мотивации к обучению актуален как никогда. В компаниях трудятся представители разных поколений, и то, что "зажигает" одних, может оставить равнодушными других. Бумеры (1946-1964): Ценят стабильность, опыт и наставничество. •Мотивация: Подчеркните, как обучение поможет им оставаться экспертами, делиться опытом с молодыми коллегами и адаптироваться к изменениям. Пр…
👍5❤3
Прыжок через голову Все мы видели эти сериалы, где заместитель это не просто коллега, а надежный союзник, помогающий достигать целей команды. Но что делать, когда зам, вместо поддержки, начинает "прыгать через голову"? Когда его действия подрывают ваш авторитет, игнорируют ваши решения или даже приводят к конфликту интересов? Первое – не паникуйте. Эмоции плохой советчик. Затем нужно разобраться, каковы причины так…
👍5❤3
Вы наняли руководителей, но разгребать все равно вам На совещании все согласились. Через неделю — ничего не сделано. Каждый руководитель ждал другого. Вы снова стали диспетчером. Позвонили одному, напомнили второму, заставили третьего договориться. Работа пошла. Ваша — встала. Вы платите руководителям за управление. Но сами продолжаете делать их работу — соединять людей, решения и ответственность. Самое дорогое —…
❤1👍1🔥1
Сотрудники-разрушители Офис – место, где мы проводим значительную часть жизни. К сожалению, даже в самом сплоченном коллективе могут завестись "токсичные элементы" – сотрудники-скандалисты и профессиональные манипуляторы. 1. Диагностика: кто перед нами? Прежде чем приступать к "лечению", нужно правильно поставить диагноз. Скандалист: Легко выходит из себя из-за мелочей, провоцирует конфликты, использует грубые выр…
👍7❤4
Как кризисная ситуация научила меня быть более чутким и отзывчивым к нуждам сотрудников Кризисы. Никто их не любит, но именно они часто становятся самыми мощными учителями. Один такой кризис кардинально изменил мое понимание роли руководителя и научил меня быть более чутким и отзывчивым к нуждам моих сотрудников. Несколько месяцев назад разразилась настоящая буря. Один из наших ключевых проектов, над которым мы раб…
👍7❤3
Геймификация в обучении: Как я превратили скучные тренинги в увлекательные квесты Признайтесь, кто из вас засыпал на корпоративных тренингах? Да, я тоже грешен! И, глядя на унылые лица коллег, я подумал: "Ну, так дальше продолжаться не может!" С тех пор, как я открыл для себя магию геймификации, скука на моих тренингах навсегда осталась в прошлом Представьте себе: вместо бесконечных слайдов PowerPoint и монотонных …
👍5❤3
💡 Хорошие решения начинаются с правильной информации Инвестиции, бизнес, карьера, продажи, управление, финансы - всё это тесно связано. И чем лучше понимаешь, как устроены эти процессы, тем проще ориентироваться в происходящем. Мы собрали в одной папке каналы авторов, которые делятся опытом, разбирают реальные ситуации и помогают посмотреть на привычные вещи под другим углом. Здесь можно найти практические советы,…
Showing the 12 most recent of 57 posts we hold for @managstaff. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 4 posts on @managstaff as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 8 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 25 August 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 2 days
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@iRukovoditel · 30,975
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 6 September 2026
@peskotg · 29,616
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 8 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Управляющий состав” (@managstaff), 7,985 subscribers as measured 1 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/managstaff.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.