Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Менеджер с Ютуба

@managerfromyoutube

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

353subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002477887940
TypeChannel
Username@managerfromyoutube
DescriptionГугл не поможет Задать вопрос: @ku_victoria
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/managerfromyoutube

Growth

3537 Aug 2026, 19:12 — 353 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 06:46 — 353 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 19:128 Aug 2026, 06:46
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 352–354 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 06:46353no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:12353first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 9 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
76.3%
avg views ÷ 353 subscribers
Avg views / post
269
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held19 (9 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total3,232
Reactions total208
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 06:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
141
Videos
8
Links
62

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

343 reactions across 18 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥8524.8%
6218.1%
👍3911.4%
❤‍🔥349.91%
339.62%
195.54%
👏113.21%
😁113.21%
😭61.75%
custom 544736316103434645951.46%
💯51.46%
😨51.46%
🤩51.46%
🙏41.17%
🤣41.17%
🥰41.17%
👀20.583%
😱20.583%
🦄20.583%
custom 528533865941384641610.292%
4 further kinds41.17%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 343reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 16:36 UTC115 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Взяла комментарий у Лены из mediacube для самых непонятливых (для себя же и взяла) 🔴А как же добросовестное использование?? 🔴Почему бы просто не вырезать? 🔴Почему не спрятать видео? 🔴У этого агентства есть признаки злоупотребления ContentID? 🔛Нюанс в том, что если канал This is Хорошо использовал контент без разрешения, то, скорее всего, добросовестное использование здесь не будет действовать. То есть, по факту, т

621❤‍🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 15:11 UTC159 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Каналу This is Хорошо пришлось удалить 200 видео, в которых были фрагменты под авторским правом Причиной стал юридический шантаж со стороны агентства ViralHog, которое управляет правами на различные вирусные видео. Компании стало мало монетизации с YouTube и они решили запросить доп выплаты с каждого видео. Интересно, насколько это вообще правомерно 🙄 Так понимаю, чтобы избежать полной блокировки канала из-за стра

😭5custom 544736316103434645953🤔1

29 Jul 2026, 13:07 UTC368 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Как шутить и не повторяться? Индивидуальный опыт не может быть бесконечным. Могу представить, что совершенно не специально шутки артистов могут быть идентичными. Так, кто первый - тот и автор. Как на практике избегать такого? Пересматривать тонны сольников или смириться, что тебя могут обвинить в «заимствовании»? ⠀⠀⠀⠀ Честно? Не знаю решения, если говорить про юмор в принципе. Раньше тех, кто шутил публично, было ог

🔥14👍742🆒1

29 Jul 2026, 13:07 UTC302 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Для этого интервью я особо тщательно прописывала вопросы, соблюдала правила пунктуации и орфографии! ⠀⠀ 💎 Сегодня на канале стэндап-комик Роман Косицын! Настоящий профессионал и замечательный человек, с которым я работаю ещё с 2019 года ⠀ Поговорили о подготовке его нового сольного концерта, тренде на отмену, перфекционизме и возможном возвращении на YouTube ⠀⠀⠀⠀ 🔥Готовьте свои жирные лайки и мы начинаем Я оч

🔥8❤‍🔥6👍2👏1

29 Jul 2026, 06:55 UTC341 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026

☝️Она рисовала для Netflix Она рисовала для ЧБД Настало время FINAL BOSSа Моё ТЗ Её талант PS.: кто понял, какой персонаж взят за основу? 👀

🔥11❤‍🔥53👍2

28 Jul 2026, 10:00 UTC268 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Завтра на канале выйдет разговор с ещё одним алмазиком! А пока собрала для вас уже вышедшие интервью, на случай, если вы что-то пропустили. А пропускать НЕЛЬЗЯ! 🔴Авторское право на YouTube с одним из лучших сотрудников партнерской сети mediacube 🔴Как работает самый большой YouTube-канал Армении 🔴Вася ВПИСКА о проекте и чуть-чуть о себе 🔴Спортивный журналист Александр Лютиков шутит и не шутит об ММА и YouTube

❤‍🔥6👍643

25 Jul 2026, 06:37 UTC341 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

✨Хороших нововведений по капельке. Но и на этом спасибо! Пользовательские обложки для Shorts и генерация превью в Ask Studio для обычных видео официально внедряются на десктопной версии! YouTube наконец добавил возможность загружать собственное персонализированное изображение в формате 9×16 для Shorts! Возможность выбрать кадр из вашего видео сохраняется. Эта функция уже доступна почти для всех, у кого включена мо

🔥1021👏1😱1custom 52853386594138464161

21 Jul 2026, 18:08 UTC333 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Я стою на коленях перед людьми, с которыми работаю в паре Но обо всём по порядку Во-первых, последние дни - ультрасложные. График: с 6 утра до 1 ночи. У меня был огромный выпуск, в котором случилось порядка 500 матов. И в первый раз (ну, за год 😁) я немножко его зафакапила. Это вылилось в дополнительные часы работы как для меня, так и для других людей. Одно наверное решение. Одна неоправданная инициатива. Вот пра

❤‍🔥76👍5🙏3🔥1

17 Jul 2026, 09:00 UTC237 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Posted without readable text

86💯5😨51😢1😭1

15 Jul 2026, 16:37 UTC246 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

В каком формате хотите узнать как проходит моя работа с видео на 4+ часа?

  1. Хочу читать52%
  2. Хочу слушать21%
  3. Хочу смотреть и слушать50%

The shares total 123%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

❤‍🔥3🔥2🦄21

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @managerfromyoutube. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

15 Jul 2026, 16:37 UTCAnonymous Poll42 voters

В каком формате хотите узнать как проходит моя работа с видео на 4+ часа?

  1. Хочу читать52%
  2. Хочу слушать21%
  3. Хочу смотреть и слушать50%

The shares total 123%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 433,345 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Менеджер с Ютуба” (@managerfromyoutube), 353 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/managerfromyoutube.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.