Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for روانکاوی psychoanalysis

Channel

روانکاوی psychoanalysis

@mana_psychoanalysis

On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

608subscribers

+12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002130962370
TypeChannel
Username@mana_psychoanalysis
Descriptionماناسیری روانکاوفردی و گروهی سوپروایزر تحلیلی/پژوهشگر حوزه psychosocial و روانکاوی/مدرس روانکاوی/کاندیدای روانکاوی cmps وp_hole نیویورک Focus on Migration & transgender Psychoanalysis Wa.me/+989231384927 @sirimana صفحات من: Yek.link/Psychoanalysis
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held6
On Telegramt.me/mana_psychoanalysis

Previous handles

@mana_psychoanalysis was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.

@maddgirlnotes
held 8 August 20268 August 2026

Growth

593608600.57 August 2026 — 596 subscribers8 August 2026 — 596 subscribers15 August 2026 — 593 subscribers22 August 2026 — 596 subscribers8 September 2026 — 608 subscribers8 September 2026 — 608 subscribers7 August 20268 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 32 days, net +12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 591–610 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 14:22608no change
8 Sept 2026, 13:47608+12
22 Aug 2026, 17:27596+3
15 Aug 2026, 06:12593-3
8 Aug 2026, 03:16596no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:02596first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 29 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
44.5%
avg views ÷ 608 subscribers
Avg views / post
271
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.903%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 40 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held40 (29 June 20262 September 2026)
Views total3,788
Reactions total22
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Sept 2026, 14:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
124
Videos
13
Links
730

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

48 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👏2143.8%
1735.4%
👍816.7%
💔12.08%
😁12.08%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 06:30 UTC84 viewsread 8 September 2026

میتونید توی گروه عضو بشید دوستان اونجا هم پست ها هستند هم میتونید سوالاتتون رو بپرسید نظراتتون رو هم بگید. @psychoanalyticpapers

2 Sept 2026, 06:29 UTC84 views1 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Poll

آیا با اینکه گروه تاپیک داره موافقید یا بنظرتون بهتره تاپیک ها برداشته بشه و پیام ها یکجا دیده بشن؟

  1. موافقم33%
  2. تاپیک برداشته بشه22%
  3. نمیدانم شاید حق با تو باشد(دیدن نتایج سابق)44%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

😁1

2 Sept 2026, 04:37 UTC94 viewsread 8 September 2026

گاهی مهاجرت بعد از تمام‌شدنِ خودِ مهاجرت شروع می‌شود. وقتی دیگر خانه پیدا شده، کار پیدا شده، مدارک آمده، زبان تا حدی جا افتاده و زندگی ظاهراً دوباره روی ریل افتاده است. آن‌وقت ممکن است یک سؤال باقی بماند: «پس چرا هنوز احساس می‌کنم جایی نیستم؟» این سؤال برای روانکاوی جالب است؛ چون ما را خیلی سریع از جغرافیا به روان می‌برد. «جایی نبودن» یعنی چه؟ آیا مسئله فقدان یک کشور است؟ یک خانواده؟ یک زبان؟ یک عشق؟ یک موقعیت اجتماع

2 Sept 2026, 04:36 UTC75 viewsread 8 September 2026
Photo

لایو روانکاوی مهاجرت شنبه ۱۴شهریور ساعت ۲۰:۳۰ به وقت تهران شرکت رایگان برای شرکت به صفحه ی اینستاگرام من بروید.

1 Sept 2026, 03:54 UTC404 viewsread 8 September 2026

تاریخچه ی گروه درمانی تحلیلی _ وقتی روانکاوی وارد گروه شد اگر پست های قبلی را تا اینجا دنبال کرده باشیم، یک چیز باید هنوز کمی ناآرام بماند. ما پیش از شکل‌گیری گروه‌درمانی تحلیلی، گروه‌هایی داشتیم. بیمارانی که کنار هم قرار می‌گرفتند، کلاس می‌گرفتند، دربارهٔ بیماری‌شان حرف می‌زدند، از تجربهٔ یکدیگر استفاده می‌کردند، تشویق می‌شدند، گاهی آموزش می‌دیدند و گاهی حتی از حضور دیگران به‌عنوان چیزی درمان‌کننده استفاده می‌کر

30 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTC385 viewsread 8 September 2026

مهاجرت برای همه یکسان نیست! حتی اگر دو نفر دقیقاً در یک زمان، از یک شهر، به یک کشور مهاجرت کنند؛ با یک هواپیما بروند، در یک شهر زندگی کنند و حتی تجربه‌های ظاهراً مشابهی داشته باشند، باز هم ممکن است «مهاجرت» برای هیچ‌کدام معنای یکسانی نداشته باشد. چون مهاجرت فقط جابه‌جایی از یک جغرافیا به جغرافیای دیگر نیست. برای یکی ممکن است معنای رهایی داشته باشد؛ برای دیگری فقدان. برای یکی امکان ساختن یک زندگی تازه؛ برای دیگری تجرب

30 Aug 2026, 14:29 UTC73 viewsread 8 September 2026
Photo

ویدئوی خوانش فروید از متن اصلی _ ادامه ی کتاب تعبیر رویا مشاهده در یوتیوب

24 Aug 2026, 20:52 UTC449 views3 reactionsread 8 September 2026

تاریخچه ی گروه درمانی تحلیلی _ وقتی گروه درمانی وجود نداشت اگر بخواهیم تاریخ گروه‌درمانی تحلیلی را از جایی شروع کنیم که هنوز «گروه‌درمانی تحلیلی» وجود نداشت، ناچاریم کمی عقب‌تر برویم؛ به زمانی که اساساً این تصور هنوز بدیهی نشده بود که چند انسان را می‌توان هم‌زمان در یک فضای درمانی نشاند و خودِ این جمع‌شدن چیزی به فرایند درمان اضافه می‌کند. گروه، پیش از آن‌که «ماتریس» باشد، «کلاس» بود. پیش از آن‌که «انتقال متقابل»

👏3

21 Aug 2026, 04:38 UTC190 views4 reactionsread 8 September 2026

چه سراسر تهی و غم من در آیینه چه آسان و سبک میشکنم و سراسیمگی لحظه ی بی تابی پروانه ی شب گرگ سرما ز پس شاخه بجا می ماند و ترنم به شفق تن داده گل شبنم ز نفس می افتد آه! در حین عزاداری سرخ چه گناهی خوابیده؟ غنچه های لاله خورد و له زیر غباری نمناک خواب آشفته ی باد چه سکونی جاریست و تبسم به خلاء می گرید شاید این ره به شکار ققنوس انجامد شاید این شب به سحرگاه جلایی یابد و در آن سوی گذرگاه تلاطم پر پرواز کبوتر به صدا در آید

4

20 Aug 2026, 06:19 UTC449 views5 reactionsread 8 September 2026

از بیون تا لکان؛ چرا «روانکاوی» یک نظریه واحد نیست؟ وقتی می‌گوییم «روانکاوی»، در واقع درباره‌ی یک سنت نظری واحد صحبت نمی‌کنیم؛ بلکه با مجموعه‌ای از دستگاه‌های نظری مواجهیم که گاهی مسئله‌ی روان را از اساس به شکل متفاوتی تعریف می‌کنند. مثلاً اگر از یک روانکاو بیونین بپرسیم «مسئله‌ی بیمار چیست؟» ممکن است بحث خیلی زود به ظرفیت فکرکردن، تبدیل تجربه‌ی خام هیجانی به تجربه‌ی قابل‌فکر و نقش کانتینر/کانتینید برسد. در رویکرد

👏41

19 Aug 2026, 06:06 UTC108 viewsread 8 September 2026

پذیرش مراجع جدید برای جلسات تحلیل فردی گاهی آنچه ما را به جست‌وجوی کمک روانی می‌رساند فقط یک بحران یا یک نشانه مشخص نیست؛ گاهی احساس تکرار شدن یک الگوست. تکرار رابطه‌هایی که به رنج ختم می‌شوند، احساس گیر افتادن در چرخه‌هایی که تغییرشان دشوار است، فاصله‌ای که میان تصویری که از خود داریم و آنچه تجربه می‌کنیم شکل گرفته، یا بخش‌هایی از زندگی روانی که هنوز فرصت شنیده‌شدن پیدا نکرده‌اند. تحلیل فردی فضایی است برای مکث کر

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @mana_psychoanalysis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Sept 2026, 06:29 UTCAnonymous Poll9 voters

آیا با اینکه گروه تاپیک داره موافقید یا بنظرتون بهتره تاپیک ها برداشته بشه و پیام ها یکجا دیده بشن؟

  1. موافقم33%
  2. تاپیک برداشته بشه22%
  3. نمیدانم شاید حق با تو باشد(دیدن نتایج سابق)44%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

اسرار روانشناسی دکتر انوشه
@arameshzehne · 29,510
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 September 2026
روانشناسی آرامش ذهن
@Arameshzehn44 · 49,303
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“روانکاوی psychoanalysis” (@mana_psychoanalysis), 608 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mana_psychoanalysis.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.