Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 50 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 88–95 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 06:17
90
+1
13 Sept 2026, 19:18
89
-1
6 Sept 2026, 16:57
90
-1
28 Aug 2026, 22:03
91
-1
21 Aug 2026, 06:54
92
-1
13 Aug 2026, 07:34
93
-1
9 Aug 2026, 13:02
94
no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:18
94
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 3 October 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 October 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 44s
Average length
1m 44s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
24 reactions across 11 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
18
75.0%
😢
5
20.8%
🔥
1
4.17%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 3 October 2023 to 13 October 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Dear Subscribers we are shutting down all our channels. We expected a bigger Subscribers and views when we reopened the channel but that didn't happen. We would like to thank all our members for supporting us. Here are some website that will help you get all the contents we used to post.
Whoscored.com
Hoofoot.com
Fullmatchsreplay.com
We wish you all the best and goodbye 👋
@Man_city_news_official
🏴 English Premier League GW8 🏴
⌚FT
🔫 Arsenal 1⃣-0⃣ 🏆 Manchester City
⚽️ Martinelli 86'
🅰 Havertz
🎙 We are currently 3rd in the PL table with 18 points. Tottenham Hotspurs is first and Arsenal second both having 20 points.
@MAN_CITY_NEWS_OFFICIAL
🏴 FA Women's Super League GW2 🏴
⌚ FT
🩵 Man City 1⃣-1⃣ 🔵 Chelsea
⚽️ Chloe Kelly 7' ⚽️ Guro Reiten 90+6'
🅰 None 🅰 Melanie Leupoiz
📕(📒📒) Alex Greenwood 38'
📕(📒📒) Lauren Hemp 81'
🌟 MOTM was Keating
Man City XI | Keating, Aleixandri, Greenwood (C), Fowler, Kelly, Hemp, Angeldahl, Morgan, Roord, Hasegawa, Kennedy
SUBS | MacIver, Houghton, Coombs, Castellanos, Park, Casparij, Shaw, M…
Press Conference ahead of Sunday's match 🗣
💬 PEP: (On Stones availability) "No. He's not ready to play. Maybe for the national team but not us."
💬 PEP: "We are not going to cry or complain [about replacing Rodrigo in the team]. We have to find a solution. We will have 11 players there to try and win in London."
💬 PEP: (On De Bruyne) "I see him every day and he's getting better and his mood is good. Hopefully soone…
➡ Next Match
🏴 English Premier League GW8 🏴
🔫 Arsenal 🆚 🏆 Manchester City
🗓 Sunday, October 08
⏰ 18:30 EAT
🏟 Emirates Stadium
PL Table 📊
1⃣ Man City 18 points 12 Goal difference
3⃣ Arsenal 17 points 9 Goal difference
You can predict the match result using our bot @man_city_news_bot
@man_city_news_official
The Match's extended highlights and full match replay have been posted in our partner channel Man City G⚽als
@man_city_news_goals
@man_city_news_goals
@man_city_news_goals
🇪🇺 UEFA CHAMPIONS #UCL 🇪🇺
⌚ HT
🇩🇪 RB Leipzig 0⃣-1⃣ 🏴 Man City
⚽️ Foden 25'
🅰 Lewis
@Man_city_news_official
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @man_city_news_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@man_city_news_official named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@man_city_news_goals named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Man City News 🄼🄲🄽” (@man_city_news_official), 90 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/man_city_news_official.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.