Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 54 days, net -5,101. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 115,442–122,976 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
29 Sept 2026, 19:38
117,006
-686
18 Sept 2026, 00:39
117,692
+246
15 Sept 2026, 19:22
117,446
+354
14 Sept 2026, 00:38
117,092
+781
12 Sept 2026, 09:40
116,311
-254
10 Sept 2026, 08:19
116,565
-332
7 Sept 2026, 03:37
116,897
-325
4 Sept 2026, 09:38
117,222
-166
2 Sept 2026, 23:59
117,388
-135
1 Sept 2026, 22:54
117,523
+12
1 Sept 2026, 01:38
117,511
-124
30 Aug 2026, 22:06
117,635
-60
29 Aug 2026, 21:54
117,695
-209
28 Aug 2026, 19:03
117,904
-229
27 Aug 2026, 17:26
118,133
-64
26 Aug 2026, 15:12
118,197
-84
25 Aug 2026, 12:24
118,281
-12
24 Aug 2026, 11:44
118,293
-255
22 Aug 2026, 22:05
118,548
-317
21 Aug 2026, 13:56
118,865
first reading
Engagement
2,207 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 118 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.32%
avg views ÷ 117,006 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,060
1,136 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.97%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1,136
of 2,207 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1,105 of 1,136 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 October 2026
Posts held
2,207 (6 August 2026 – 2 October 2026)
Views total
5,743,986
Reactions total
167,965
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Oct 2026, 10:54 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈20,800
Videos
≈15,100
Links
≈1,650
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
8h 30m
Average length
2m 34s
Measured directly from 199 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
147,502 reactions across 963 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤣
47,518
32.2%
❤
23,971
16.3%
👍
16,547
11.2%
💔
15,099
10.2%
🔥
11,939
8.09%
🤬
10,819
7.33%
👏
7,057
4.78%
😁
4,456
3.02%
😡
1,651
1.12%
😭
1,418
0.961%
👎
1,279
0.867%
😢
893
0.605%
❤🔥
846
0.574%
🫡
829
0.562%
👌
634
0.43%
🕊
490
0.332%
🥰
485
0.329%
😍
390
0.264%
🎉
370
0.251%
😱
282
0.191%
7 further kinds
529
0.359%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 972 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 147,502 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 5 September 2026 to 2 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
55
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 0.4%
Most on one post
51
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mameleekat. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 5 September 2026 to 2 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
طبق گزارش سامانه اطلاعرسانی تصویری ارتش آمریکا، نیروهای خنثیسازی هستهای همراه با رنجرهای هنگ ۷۵، تمرین تصرف و پاکسازی یک تأسیسات هستهای زیرزمینی رو در شرایط شبیهسازیشده درگیری و تیراندازی برگزار کردن.
این تمرین در حالی انجام شده که گزارشهایی از بررسی احتمال اعزام نیروهای ویژه آمریکا به ایران و آمادهسازی برای سناریوهای عملیات زمینی منتشر شده، اما هنوز تصمیم قطعی برای چنین عملیاتی اعلام نشده.
❤️@mameleekat
🔺️حاملگی ناخواسته یکی از مسئولین سابق پارس جنوبی(ایشون آقا هستند)
شنیده ها حاکی از آن است که آقای حسنوند رییس کمیسیون نفت مجلس شورای اسلامی در سخنرانی دو روز گذشته خود گفته که در وزارت نفت فاجعه رخ داده است،از اختلاس های چند هزار میلیاردی تا مدارک جعلی مدیران و سرقت های علمی ایشان.
شرح خبر:
یکی از مدیران عامل سابق پارس جنوبی که پس از بازنشستگی و بر خلاف قانون منع بکارگیری بازنشستگان و با رانت به سمت مدیر عاملی یکی…
حتی روزهای آخر عمر و حکومتتون هم نتونستین تصویری باشکوه از خودتون بسازید
هرچی دارید روایتهای نخ نما و تکراریست
از صدها متر زیر زمین بیانیه پیروزی میدهید و منتظر مرگ هستید
این سرزمین نامهای بزرگی در تاریخ خود ثبت و ضبط کرده
ولی شما انقدر حقیر بودید که حتی نامی از شما نخواهد ماند
حق با شما بود آریامهر بزرگ تاریخ قضاوت میکند
حتی نسلی که شما را ندید عاشق شما شد
شکوه و عظمت را به کشورمون بازمیگردانیم حتی اگر بهایش جا…
🔴 دیروز کدام خودورسازها تحریم شدن؟
🔴وزارت خزانهداری آمریکا علاوه بر تحریم شرکتهای خودروسازی داخل ایران، تقریباً تمام شرکتهای خارجی مرتبط با تأمین قطعات صنعت خودرو ایران را نیز تحریم کرد که باعث افزایش شدید قیمت قطعات یدکی و ماشینهای بازار خواهد شد
❤️@mameleekat
سفیر آمریکا در سازمان ملل: ایران قوانین را نقض کرده و هرگز حاضر نیست از جاهطلبیهای هستهای خود دست بکشد
❤️@mameleekat
👍100❤2👏2🤣1
Showing the 12 most recent of 2,207 posts we hold for @mameleekat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 27 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 23 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
7
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
7
vacant every time we have ever looked
@mameleekat named 7 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@tahlil_one named in 1 post, 26 September 2026 – 26 September 2026
@english named in 1 post, 24 September 2026 – 24 September 2026
@telegram_vip named in 1 post, 18 September 2026 – 18 September 2026
@bit_dolar named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
@linkrayan named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
@dolar_online named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@ad_admin named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
گروه کامپیوتر دانشگاه صنعتی قوچان @QIETcomputer · 513#71
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
گوساله @gusaleh · 27,275 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 10 September 2026
DrLinux Mtprotoپروکسی @tweetdr · 31,892 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 5 September 2026
کافه خنده ジ @Kafeh_khande · 36,397 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 1 September 2026
[ آمپول بازی ] @Ampool_Bazii · 47,913 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 25 August 2026
بدنسازی اصولی @Badan_Ssazi · 59,633 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“خبرگزاری[مملکت]” (@mameleekat), 117,006 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mameleekat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.