Channel
@mamauchit
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
827subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 21 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001667959011 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mamauchit |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 21 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mamauchit |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 13:41 | 827 | +4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 16:13 | 823 | -2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:57 | 825 | +1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 824 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 19 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
94 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 69 | 73.4% | |
| 👍 | 13 | 13.8% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 10.6% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.06% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 1.06% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 94 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2Vtzqx3ViUb | 1 | 12 August 2026 | 12 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2026 to 13 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Летом, кажется, хочется только отдыхать. Но я заметила, что именно летом у детей есть отличная возможность спокойно прокачать то, на что в учебном году часто не хватает времени. Мой сын Жан, перешёл в 9 класс, сейчас занимается на курсе олимпиадной физики. И, честно говоря, уровень занятий довольно высокий — это уже совсем не просто «школьная физика». Здесь нужно думать, искать нестандартные решения, разбираться, по…
👍4❤1
Video, posted without a caption
🔔 ДЗЫ-Ы-Ы-ЫНЬ! Уведомление для родителей, которые выбрали семейное образование Если вы: ✅ Хотите, чтобы ребенок учился самостоятельно, а не только под вашим контролем ✅ Замечаете, что мотивация то появляется, то исчезает, и приходится постоянно вовлекать его в учебу ✅ Ищете способы сохранить интерес к обучению, не превращаясь в учителя, который бесконечно напоминает, проверяет и заставляет ✅ Если хотите, чтобы ре…
Photo, posted without a caption
Запись эфира про математику и олимпиадную математику с Юлией Самсоновой создателем Академии математического мышления «ЛОМ» https://t.me/LOM_maths
❤3
Начинаем прямой эфир через 10 минут. Ссылка в сообщении 👆🏻
Завтра в 12:00 МСК приглашаем на прямой эфир с Юлией Самсоновой — руководителем Академии математического мышления «ЛОМ». Обсудим: — как перестать бояться сложных задач; — что дают олимпиады помимо дипломов; — как математика меняет мышление. И многое другое. Вопросы можно задавать прямо во время эфира. Ссылка для входа: Ссылка на подключение к ЗУМ-конференции https://us02web.zoom.us/j/7664371594?pwd=RHB0RWZDREJQcU…
👍2🔥1
🧮 Родители школьников! Уже скоро проведем прямой эфир с педагогом по математике и олимпиадной математике. Разберем ваши реальные ситуации: • ребенок не любит математику; • делает глупые ошибки; • стоит ли идти в олимпиады; • как заинтересовать предметом. ✍️ Оставьте свой вопрос в комментариях — и мы их разберем в эфире.
❤2
Ссылка на телеграмм Академии Математического Мышления Лом https://t.me/LOM_maths
❤9
Мы с головой окунулись в поступление старшего сына Марка. И, если честно, именно этот процесс заставил меня посмотреть на образование немного иначе. Когда видишь всё изнутри, понимаешь, что хороших оценок уже недостаточно. Мы столкнулись с тем, что одних пятерок мало. Если речь идет о поступлении на грант или получении скидки на обучение — практически везде нужны личные достижения, подтвержденные сертификатами, дип…
❤12
Photo, posted without a caption
Вот в инстаграм поступил вопрос про цвет аттестата. Ответ на фото.
❤10
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @mamauchit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“mama.uchit Семейное обучение” (@mamauchit), 827 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mamauchit.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.