Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for МамаХак 2:0 | Родителям о детях

Channel

МамаХак 2:0 | Родителям о детях

@mamahak_new

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

528subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001618197127
TypeChannel
Username@mamahak_new
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mamahak_new

Growth

528529528.57 August 2026 — 529 subscribers8 August 2026 — 529 subscribers15 August 2026 — 528 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 528–529 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 02:05528-1
8 Aug 2026, 04:00529no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:32529first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
59s
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

403 reactions across 16 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
13433.3%
🔥11729.0%
👍286.95%
😁245.96%
❤‍🔥143.47%
💘143.47%
💯133.23%
👏112.73%
🎉71.74%
👌61.49%
🥰51.24%
😭40.993%
😱40.993%
🤪40.993%
30.744%
🙊30.744%
💩20.496%
🤡20.496%
🤮20.496%
🌚10.248%
5 further kinds51.24%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 403reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2026 to 10 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mamahak_new. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 May 2026 to 10 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

10 Jul 2026, 09:57 UTC304 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Моё новое приобретение

🔥183❤‍🔥32🐳1

7 Jul 2026, 12:17 UTC353 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Кстааааати. Я тут между делом сдала экзамен на дефектолога. Та-дам 🎉

🔥22💘5👏3🤝1

7 Jul 2026, 11:31 UTC344 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Ещё немного о культурном досуге на выпускном. Из плей-листа филолога 🤣

🔥14😁96👍2💘2❤‍🔥1

7 Jul 2026, 11:27 UTC258 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Всмотритесь в эти лица. Гордость школы, города, области. Опора страны 🫂

18🔥5🤡2❤‍🔥1

7 Jul 2026, 11:27 UTC244 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Разумное, доброе, вечное посеяла. Теперь можно и расслабиться. От души ❤️

12🔥11👍6😁3

7 Jul 2026, 08:47 UTC220 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Долгожданные каникулы у училки литературы 🤣 Я не фанат романтического фэнтези про попаданок. Для меня, привыкшей к тяжелому люксу: русской хтони, английской драме и мрачному скандинавскому нуару, всё это просто. Слишком легкий язык, слишком предсказуемый сюжет. Я закатываю глаза всякий раз, когда читаю про какое-нибудь «её лоно», в которое условный «принц Севера с черными глазами и мускулистыми руками» вошёл, изда

6🔥5💘3😁2❤‍🔥1😱1

4 Jul 2026, 08:44 UTC265 views33 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вот вы думаете, что мы работаем за деньги 💔 Но на самом деле, мы работаем, чтобы однажды услышать: «Мы вас любим»

26💘4🔥3

17 Jun 2026, 11:48 UTC450 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Русский сдали ВСЕ 🎉 💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜

🔥19🎉7🥰5

12 Jun 2026, 09:29 UTC562 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Как обещала: почему изложение нужно убрать из ОГЭ? Частное мнение рядового учителя: Изложение - самый сложный вид работы, потому что самый стрессовый. Большинство людей - вызуалы (более 80%). Это значит, что на слух эти 80% воспринимают информацию заведомо хуже, чем глазами. Ребенку во время изложения нужно ОДНОВРЕМЕННО совершать несколько сложных операций: ✅ Внимательно слушать; ✅ Отделять главную информацию от в

💯98😭4😱3🌚1🤔1

11 Jun 2026, 06:58 UTC356 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Первый день проверки ОГЭ. Нуууууу….такое 🤦‍♀️ По моим наблюдениям, примерно 1/5 часть детей не приступала к сочинению вообще. Это плохо. Ещё часть как будто не знает, что мы больше не приводим пример из жизненного опыта. Или знает, но таким образом добирает количество слов, чтобы не сняли баллы. А ещё я настаиваю, чтобы изложение как вид работы из ОГЭ убрали совсем. Надо объяснить, почему?

9👏4💯2

10 Jun 2026, 07:07 UTC350 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Мысль дня: Если ко всем людям относиться так, будто у них легкая степень ЗПР, можно, в целом, нормально общаться Простите 🤣

😁10🤪4👍3🙊3💯2

9 Jun 2026, 11:28 UTC310 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Я всё ещё учусь на дефектолога. Знаете, сколько ошибок я сегодня допустила? Кучу! Страшные ли они? Нет, это первое практическое занятие: разбор методов и способов по классификациям разных специалистов, которые я ещё не выучила. Неловко ли мне? Нет. Потому что я знаю, что с первого раза все не выучить - это нормально. Ошибаться - нормально. Задавать вопросы - нормально. Как я себя чувствую, когда после разбора ч

17👍8🔥6

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mamahak_new. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Jun 2026, 08:37 UTCFinal Results375 voters

Как часто вы проводите досуг с детьми на природе или на культурных мероприятиях (фестивали, мастер-классы)?

  1. Раз в неделю и чаще13%
  2. 2–3 раза в месяц17%
  3. Раз в месяц14%
  4. Несколько раз в год28%
  5. Практически не бываем28%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Jun 2026, 08:37 UTCFinal Results316 voters

На какие праздники вы обязательно проводите досуг с детьми на природе или на культурных мероприятиях (несколько вариантов ответа)?

  1. Новый год69%
  2. День тигра7%
  3. День знаний28%
  4. Международный день защиты детей38%
  5. День рождения Деда Мороза6%
  6. День семьи, любви и верности31%
  7. Религиозные праздники16%
  8. Другое (в комментариях)11%

The shares total 206%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

5 Jun 2026, 08:37 UTCFinal Results543 voters

Как вы считаете, нужен ли Приамурью свой сказочный персонаж – хранитель традиций, похожий на Деда Мороза, но с местным колоритом?

  1. Да, это поднимет интерес детей и взрослых к изучению культуры и истории малой родины36%
  2. Скорее да, чем нет12%
  3. Не вижу смысла, достаточно обычного Деда Мороза43%
  4. Затрудняюсь ответить9%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2026 to 10 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“МамаХак 2:0 | Родителям о детях” (@mamahak_new), 528 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mamahak_new.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.