Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Мама Рабьо

Channel

Мама Рабьо

@mama_rabiot

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

140subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001831519767
TypeChannel
Username@mama_rabiot
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mama_rabiot

Growth

139140139.57 August 2026 — 139 subscribers8 August 2026 — 139 subscribers16 August 2026 — 140 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 139–140 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 02:54140+1
8 Aug 2026, 22:45139no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:59139first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 10 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10m 41s
Average length
2m 08s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

115 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4135.7%
🔥2622.6%
🏆1311.3%
👍1311.3%
🤣97.83%
😁86.96%
🫡54.35%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 115reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 10 October 2025 to 11 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Jun 2026, 16:35 UTC294 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

На кого ставим на этом мундиале? Мое абсолютно необъективное горячее сердце хочет увидеть как CR7 наконец-таки поднимет этот заветный кубок🏆 Кроме того традиционно за пента-кампеоне, почему-то кажется, что этот тренд со странными заявками папы Карло и Тухеля провалится и в финале будут условные Нидерланды (с довольно мощной обороной) и та же заряженная Португалия За кого болеем? Кюрасао?🇨🇼 😏

30 May 2026, 17:02 UTC342 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

P.S. Вадим Лукомский подписался на мой канал😱 Теперь я обязан пилить посты почаще🔥🔥🔥

👍5🔥32

30 May 2026, 16:59 UTC283 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Всю жизнь мы думали, что Артета ученик Гвардиолы, но видим, что его истинный кумир это Диего Симеоне😁 Арсенал заставил ПСЖ играть в неудобном сценарии после забитого мяча Выделяется U-образное владение парижан и топовое закрытие всех опасных зон от канониров. Дембеле и реже Хвича пробуют креативить, но этого мало. Первый реальный Big Chance французов случился лишь на 43 минуте Что думаете, во втором тайме Луис Энри

2

28 Apr 2026, 18:59 UTC463 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Мужики, быстро, кто?!

  1. ПСЖ61%
  2. Мюнхен39%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Apr 2026, 07:05 UTC516 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

POV: любой тренер Реала, кроме Алонсо

🔥31

7 Apr 2026, 16:49 UTC449 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Реал Мадрид сегодня такой типа:

2

17 Mar 2026, 12:29 UTC470 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Небольшая нарезка с последней тренировки Armenian United🇦🇲🧠⚽️

9🏆3👍3

14 Mar 2026, 20:51 UTC427 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Кого вы больше любите, Вальверде или вашу маму?🤪

4 Mar 2026, 19:26 UTC473 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Хотел написать, что ЦСКА и Краснодар две единственные жемчужины российского футбола, но судья затмил обе эти команды Цирк…

😁3

2 Mar 2026, 08:45 UTC457 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Недавно журналист задал вопрос Хосепу Гвардиоле о тактике горожан — и Пеп искренне удивился самому вопросу🧠 Ответ ушёл не в схему и цифры, а в идеи, принципы и нюансы игры. И я вспомнил, как когда-то задал похожий вопрос бывшему главному тренеру Амкара⚽️ Тоже разговор о футболе. Тоже про тактику. Но абсолютно другое настроение ответа😄

😁51

26 Nov 2025, 03:37 UTC974 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Немного свежего контента от Armenian United🇦🇲 Собрали небольшие кадры с последней тренировки и игры. Ничего особенного — просто наш рабочий процесс и моменты с поля💪🏻🔥

14🔥8🫡3👍1

12 Nov 2025, 19:09 UTC879 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @arakelyan_arsenVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

🏆10

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @mama_rabiot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Apr 2026, 18:59 UTCAnonymous Poll49 voters

Мужики, быстро, кто?!

  1. ПСЖ61%
  2. Мюнхен39%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 10 October 2025 to 11 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мама Рабьо” (@mama_rabiot), 140 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mama_rabiot.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.