Channel
@mama_psycho
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
519subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 27 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001783704951 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mama_psycho |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 27 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mama_psycho |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 03:18 | 519 | -4 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 14:58 | 523 | +2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:52 | 521 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:30 | 522 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 11 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (11 August 2026 – 27 August 2026) |
| Views total | 149 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Aug 2026, 21:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
34 reactions across 10 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 29 | 85.3% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 14.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Как принимать решения со 100% уверенностью, когда логика бессильна? ⏱️Бывало так: всё просчитали, а внутри странное чувство? В итоге оказывается, что нужно было слушать тот самый тихий голос. Логика работает только с прошлым опытом. А интуиция и чуйка — это ваш внутренний навигатор, который видит скрытые и лучшие пути. Этот навык можно и нужно тренировать. В честь скорого старта моего нового курса, который начнетс…
День метафорических предсказаний!🔮Вытаскиваю карты для каждого из вас. Пишите в комментариях свою актуальную тему: работа, отношения, дети, здоровье и так далее. В ответ я пришлю вашу карту. Поехали! 👇
Интуиция: наука или мистика? Интересен тот факт, что интуиция есть у 100% людей❗ Каждый из нас чувствует, куда повернуть в жизни, и подсознательно знает, ждет ли его впереди успех или провал. Но нас настолько приучили «думать только головой», что шестое чувство просто отключилось 🤷♀️. Более того, фразы «я так чувствую» или «по моим ощущениям» чаще вызывают у окружающих скепсис и сарказм 🙄. В итоге наши базовые н…
❤1
Просто работа, или работа мечты? Сегодня я хочу вам рассказать историю о том, как благодаря интуиции я в 2012 году нашла место работы своей мечты. В 2011 году я выпустилась из ВУЗа и впервые пошла в работу — в найм, в офис на улице Гоголя. Проработала на этом месте несколько месяцев и вдруг почувствовала острое желание оттуда уволиться. Мне вдруг стало там все просто невыносимо. Мне говорили: 🔥 «Не торопись» 🔥 «…
🔥5❤1
File, posted without a caption
❤1
Приглашаю вас на свою новую авторскую программу 💥 Для тех, кто устал / больше не может думать только разумом, будем учиться слышать голос своей интуиции, принимать внутренние решения опираясь на себя 💫 Детали и программа 👇 http://psy-anna.ru/intuiciya
❤2
🔗 Запись встречи можно посмотреть по ссылке: https://a.teleboss.ru/play/075d2c43-2135-4395-8e37-6cd3ede1d389 Сегодня говорили про: 🎯 подавленную агрессию 🎯 быть хорошей для других, а не для себя 🎯 принятие себя разной 🎯 разрешение БРАТЬ (деньги, подарки и пр.) 🎯 тему базовой безопасности 🎯 разрешение себе быть живой и проявлять свои чувства Спасибо всем участникам, кто вызвался на разборы!
Сегодня будет прямой эфир с разборами по Психосоматике. Начинаем через 20 минут 🤩
❤2
File, posted without a caption
🔐 Сегодня предлагаю вам сделать короткую авторскую практику по работе с Обидой. Это эмоция - одна из троицы (вина, обида, стыд), которые максимально негативно влияют на нашу жизнь. Аудиозапись ниже⬇️
Где искать ответы, когда запутался? 🤔 На днях работала с клиенткой, и в очередной раз заметила одну важную вещь. ✨Многие из нас годами ищут себя. Пытаются подобрать «ключи» к своей жизни, найти правильные ответы и понять, какое решение принять. И в этом поиске мы привыкли безоговорочно верить только одному инструменту — нашему разуму. 📈Логика, графики, взвешенные аргументы «за» и «против» кажутся нам единственной …
❤3
File, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @mama_psycho. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Анна Андрющенко 🌘 Психолог” (@mama_psycho), 519 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mama_psycho.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.