Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Малой Фоткает

Channel

Малой Фоткает

@maloyfotkaet

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

448subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002119270957
TypeChannel
Username@maloyfotkaet
DescriptionФотографирую 📸 футбол ⚽️ в Подольске Для сотрудничества писать в личку @maksgrach23
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/maloyfotkaet

Growth

4487 Aug 2026, 13:45 — 448 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 05:02 — 448 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 13:458 Aug 2026, 05:02
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 447–449 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 05:02448no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:45448first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 17 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
95.9%
avg views ÷ 448 subscribers
Avg views / post
430
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026
Posts held10 (17 July 202629 July 2026)
Views total4,298
Reactions total87
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 05:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,050
Videos
29
Links
199

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
16s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

87 reactions across 9 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2225.3%
🔥1618.4%
👍1517.2%
🤣1112.6%
👏78.05%
🤝78.05%
😁33.45%
❤‍🔥22.30%
👌22.30%
👨‍💻11.15%
💘11.15%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 87reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 17:59 UTC212 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Парни, окажите пожалуйста помощь, подпишитесь на моего знакомого из Волгограда, Тёма открыл свой тг-канал где рассказывает про Ротор и о российском футболе, да и в целом делится частичкой своей жизни 😉 https://t.me/Artem_Shevchuk Поддержим молодого блогера в развитии своего канала🥰

🤝75👏5

26 Jul 2026, 18:02 UTC338 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ладно, это все хорошо, но про фотографии я не забываю и оперативненько пост со всеми ссылочками)))📸😉 Мечта 2 - ФД Технология (https://vk.ru/album-221172343_314089677) Подольск Сити - Метеор (https://vk.ru/album-226370137_310386906) Юнайтед Парк - Мирэком (https://vk.ru/album-225568523_314089651) Дружина - Мечта (https://vk.ru/album-221172343_314089679)

4👍1🔥1

26 Jul 2026, 15:02 UTC476 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Все согласно Регламента. Впредь, огромная просьба, давайте соблюдать элементарную корректность в общении и новостях. Поэтому моя фотография сверху все еще остается актуальной. А доказательства на видео приведены, озвучены и показаны

🤣3👍2🔥1

25 Jul 2026, 20:54 UTC465 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Кто пропустил сегодняшний день на планете, я вам соболезную, тут намечается интересный момент, подсказка на фото 🧐 Кому интересно могу написать в комментариях

🤣8👨‍💻1😁1

24 Jul 2026, 21:15 UTC351 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Два дня без перерыва, в районе 4000+ деталей, угадаете кто?

5👍2🔥2

21 Jul 2026, 16:51 UTC960 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

А вот и ссылочки на все фотографии с выходных, а их много: ⚽Русь-ФД Технология ⚽Монолит - Мечта 2 ⚽Мечта - Адреналин ⚽Мирэком - Феникс ⚽Подольск Сити- Возвращение ⚽Сфера 6х6 - ЛФК Русь

👍51👏1

19 Jul 2026, 22:15 UTC353 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Често очень рад за Испанию, красавцы, полностью заслуженная победа, Аргентина полностью провалила матч…. За 90 минут ни одного удара, это не объяснимо никак, абсолютно, доп. время все расставило по своим местам. А так подводя итоги ЧМ получился крутой. Это конечно хорошо, но фотографии завтра, всем хорошей ночи и рабочей недели 😉

7🔥3❤‍🔥2💘1

19 Jul 2026, 19:03 UTC279 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

За кого в финале ЧМ

  1. Аргентина31%
  2. Испания48%
  3. За хороший футбол22%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

18 Jul 2026, 12:53 UTC330 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Уже на планете, кайфую жду матчи и кушаю мороженку)

🔥7👌2😁2

17 Jul 2026, 20:47 UTC534 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Наконец-то после стольких выходных я поеду на Планету, поэтому делюсь с вами расписанием матчей которые я фоткаю 📸: Суббота 16:00 Русь-ФД Технология 17:00 Монолит - Мечта 2 19:00 Мечта - Адреналин Воскресенье 14:00 Мирэком - Феникс 18:30 Подольск Сити- Возвращение 19:30 Сфера 6х6 - ЛФК Русь

👍5🔥2👏1

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @maloyfotkaet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Jul 2026, 19:03 UTCAnonymous Poll67 voters

За кого в финале ЧМ

  1. Аргентина31%
  2. Испания48%
  3. За хороший футбол22%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 29 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 623,164 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Малой Фоткает” (@maloyfotkaet), 448 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/maloyfotkaet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.