melon

Channel
强势猎手
@maliaofortune
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
112subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002620299750 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @maliaofortune |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/maliaofortune |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:13 | 112 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 15:33 | 113 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 114 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 114 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 9 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
4 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 3 | 75.0% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 25.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 January 2026 to 15 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
本轮最看好的
memes will continue
memes will continue
市场上每个币要仔细分析,都有它的可圈可点之处,热度很高,大佬站台。车头买了。但是在市场里这么多币,现在有一眼看上去觉得好玩的币有吗 其实很少,因为大家都是为了赚钱而玩mene的,最开始玩mems的一部分人。当然可能也有赚钱的因素在,但好玩也是一个很重要的乐趣
👍1
山野万里是我觉得2026年有机会产生最有趣的meme 确实是有趣好玩的事情
到后面同质化越来越严重,很多币就失去了好玩的元素,只是一味的模仿,看浏览量、看热度 看大佬站台 老外喜欢玩屎尿屁 因为这些东西不能登大雅之堂。那也就有它的好玩之处。把这些看似荒诞的东西,推到一个很高的市值就更加讽刺了。讽刺币也是一种很大的类型
最开始的狗狗币就是一种好玩的东西,大家觉得这个币没有意义,拿来打赏。就觉得很好玩。现在大家觉得狗狗币没什么意思,但在很早之前,狗狗币是很好玩的概念
玩meme最开始的初心是有趣好玩 买一些荒诞无厘头的东西好玩的东西
有时候想想真操蛋 那么多机会都没把握住 但是没办法 只能向前看 我写了一个word文档对于未来的行情的判断 希望能符合我的判断 让我过个肥年
👍1
好多回忆特朗普的文章 有的人拿了底部筹码,浮盈超过1,000万美金,最后落袋也没多少,有的人因为各种事情莫名其妙的错过,看到别人已经赚了几百万刀,心中充满懊悔,无法冷静下来去仔细分析。也有的人赚了非常多的钱,但在后续的市场上又还回去。这起起伏伏跌宕的人生,不正是人生K线的真实写照吗?当我们为错过太阳懊悔时,我们将错过繁星,向前看,要知道我们的人生就像K线一样起起伏伏,这就是K线人生。
👍1
错过特朗普当然很痛苦,但也没有什么必要多么懊悔。向前看,当你为错过太阳而懊悔时,你也将错过繁星
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @maliaofortune. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 548,847 of 1,629,372entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“强势猎手” (@maliaofortune), 112 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/maliaofortune.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.