Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ملکه شعرهایم هستم!

Channel

ملکه شعرهایم هستم!

@malake_afsoon

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

575subscribers

-13 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001612311196
TypeChannel
Username@malake_afsoon
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/malake_afsoon

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

575588581.57 August 2026 — 588 subscribers8 August 2026 — 588 subscribers16 August 2026 — 583 subscribers1 September 2026 — 581 subscribers9 September 2026 — 575 subscribers7 August 20269 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 33 days, net -13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 573–590 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 21:40575-6
1 Sept 2026, 01:18581-2
16 Aug 2026, 01:58583-5
8 Aug 2026, 03:18588no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:08588first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

187 reactions across 20 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💔5831.0%
🕊3217.1%
2412.8%
👍179.09%
👌136.95%
😢136.95%
🐳73.74%
😭63.21%
💯52.67%
🥰42.14%
🫡21.07%
10.535%
🆒10.535%
🌚10.535%
🔥10.535%
🙏10.535%
🤝10.535%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 187 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 21:00 UTC189 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ما دوام می آوریم همیشه دوام آورده ایم اما می‌خواستیم معنی زندگیمان فراتر از دوام آوردن باشد :)

👍1🫡1

6 Aug 2026, 20:27 UTC311 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

من او را فراموش کرده ام «او» لبخند :)

💔6

6 Aug 2026, 19:26 UTC320 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

بعد از ده سال از آخرین هم صحبتیشان در دفتر یادداشتش نوشت : من او را ترک کردم.

💔6🐳1🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 07:24 UTC329 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

اگر هنر نبود حقیقت، هلاکمان میکرد :)

💔4👍3💯21

5 Aug 2026, 05:57 UTC297 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

اما عزیزم گرچه عشق برای ما سرانجامی نداشت، اما از تو ممنونم… بابت روزهایی که عمیقاً حس کردم زنده‌ام.

5🕊4🐳1😢1

5 Aug 2026, 05:46 UTC306 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

میگفت دیگر به او فکر نمیکنم؛ ‏ این را وقتی میگفت که ‏مشغول گوش دادن به حرفهای او در ذهنش بود :)

🕊4💔3🌚1

3 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC360 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

مرا رد میکنی از خودچو موهایت به پیشانی به جایم خیره شو بر خود،نگاهی گرم وطولانی در این دنیای بیچاره که جای جنگ و آشوبست هنوز هم شعر میگویم نمیدانم تو میخوانی؟ گلی خامم درون کارگاه عاشقی هایت مگر روزی رسد چرخ نگاهت را بگردانی هزاران قول تکراری میان عاشق و معشوق تو هم قولی بده حتی اگر پایش نمی مانی همین لبخند مصنوعی به لبهایم به جا مانده فقط تو میتوانستی مرا در غم بخندانی من از جنس بهارانم درونت ریشه خواهم زد اگر

3🕊3👌2🐳1💔1

2 Aug 2026, 20:45 UTC98 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

به او می‌گفت تو با غمهایت هم زیبایی و غم هایش فراموشش میشد :)

🕊4💔3🆒1

1 Aug 2026, 16:46 UTC371 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

هانیبال لکتر تو فیلم «سکوت بره‌ها» می‌گه: «می‌دونی مشکلِ بره‌ها چیه، کلاریس؟ اونا فکر می‌کنن اگه گرگ لبخند بزنه، دیگه گرگ نیست!»

4👌4👍2💔2🐳1

1 Aug 2026, 08:12 UTC141 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

«هیچوقت » «هیشکی» اینو بهمون نگفته بود: مهم نیست چقدر خوب باشی هرچقدر هم که خوب باشی اما جای اشتباهی قرار بگیری خوب بودنت به چشم نمیاد !

👍6👌2🐳1🤝1

30 Jul 2026, 20:27 UTC139 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

از ما هیچ‌چیز باقی نمی‌ماند. جز خاطراتی که در آن دلیلِ حالِ خوبِ آدمی بوده‌ایم...

👍5💯3

28 Jul 2026, 20:28 UTC155 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

از اینکه حوصله به خرج میدید و با تمام شرایط خوب و بد در این صفحه از نگارش من حضور دارید صمیمانه سپاسگزارم 🙏❤️

9💔3🥰2🐳1🙏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @malake_afsoon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

پِ مثلِ پاییز 🍁
@Pe_mesle_paeiz0 · 25,262
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 14 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ملکه شعرهایم هستم!” (@malake_afsoon), 575 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/malake_afsoon.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.