Channel
@maklimenkova
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
364subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001394750406 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @maklimenkova |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/maklimenkova |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 22:39 | 364 | -3 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:52 | 367 | +2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:47 | 365 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:20 | 369 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:00 | 369 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
28 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 18 | 64.3% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 25.0% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 10.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Отношения — это не история двух людей. В них встречаются целые поколения. И чем больше я работаю с людьми, тем меньше верю, что в отношениях действительно только двое. Когда женщина приходит к осознанию, что: «Я боюсь, что меня бросят», а мужчина говорит: «Мне трудно подпустить человека близко» — невидимо рядом с ними стоят фигуры: мамы, которая любила через контроль, и отца, которого эмоционально не было рядом. …
🔥5❤3
Недавно разбирала отзывы от клиентов — и вижу интересную закономерность... Мне очень важно слышать, как человек оценивает свой результат и результат нашего взаимодействия. Потому что в терапевтических отношениях для изменений клиента очень большое значение имеет сам этот контакт, альянс сотрудничества. А мы живем в эпоху, когда по-настоящему бережный поддерживающий контакт стал ценностью. Если раньше здоровый стре…
❤3🔥2
Один недавний собеседник-психолог сказал мне, что психологов можно разделить на две категории. Фрейдисты и юнгианцы. Внимание вопрос: к какой категории он за 2 минуты знакомства приписал меня? Мнения?
А вы как думаете: если бы можно было разделить людей на две категории, то на какие две категории делятся люди? 🤓😏
❤3😁3
Иногда я поражаюсь людям, которые вокруг меня. И я действительно не знаю — я благословлена прекрасными людьми в жизни или к этому привели целенаправленные шаги и мое намерение? Я радуюсь и восхищаюсь каждым из них. И я недавно размышляла: а что их может объединять? Можно счесть это моей проекцией, и при этом я вижу в них важное стремление и решение: быть честным с собой. Не врать себе. Даже если это неприятно. Г…
❤6
500 дней или Непопулярная тема про дисциплину, которую многие воспринимают как ограничение свободы. Залезла недавно в приложение «Здоровья» на айфоне и обнаружила неожиданную статистику. См. график в 2023, 2024, и последний год с апреля 2025 В прошлом году в марте я решила, что буду каждый день медитировать хотя бы раз в день 15 минут. Конечно, я говорю не про аудио-медитации, а про самостоятельную практику осозн…
❤3
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @maklimenkova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Психолог Мария Клименкова” (@maklimenkova), 364 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/maklimenkova.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.