Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

❌ مجعولات

@majeolat

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

12subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003822743247
TypeChannel
Username@majeolat
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/majeolat

Growth

111211.57 August 2026 — 11 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11–12 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 05:3012no change
8 Aug 2026, 08:5612+1
7 Aug 2026, 19:2811first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 3 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
126.8%
avg views ÷ 12 subscribers
Avg views / post
15.2
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
15.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held20 (3 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total213
Reactions total11
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 05:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
22
Videos
4
Links
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 33s
Average length
47s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

12 reactions across 7 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍975.0%
👏325.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 07:56 UTC6 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

رد ادعای سونامی تجرد در ایران؛ آمار واقعی چه می‌گوید؟ در فضای مجازی ادعای عجیبی منتشر شده بود که ۴۲ میلیون نفر در ایران تجرد قطعی دارند و ۱۸ میلیون نفر از افراد بالای ۴۵ سال هرگز ازدواج نکرده‌اند! در بررسی این ادعا، امیرحسین بانکی‌پور، رئیس کمیته جمعیت و خانواده مجلس، اعلام کرده است خبر وجود ۱۸ میلیون نفر دارای تجرد قطعی، کاملاً ساختگی و کذب محض است. او همچنین تأکید کرده آمار منتشرشده درباره ۲۴ میلیون نفر که به دلی

👍2

11 Aug 2026, 07:07 UTC6 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

توییت ایدی کوهن جدید نیست توییت منتسب به ایدی کوهن، که چند روزی است مجدد در حال بازنشر است، جدید نیست و به تاریخ ۲۶ مهر ۱۴۰۴ مربوط است. @majeolat | @Ballaagh

👍1

31 Jul 2026, 07:57 UTC15 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

پاسخ به شایعات درباره حمله به بندر گازی مصر؛ قاهره و تهران روایت‌های رسانه‌ای را رد کردند پس از انتشار گزارش‌هایی درباره نقش ایران در حمله پهپادی به بندر دمیاط، وزیر اطلاع‌رسانی مصر اعلام کرد قاهره چنین ادعایی را تأیید نمی‌کند و تحقیقات ادامه دارد. هم‌زمان، وزارت خارجه ایران نیز هرگونه دخالت را رد و بر احترام به حاکمیت مصر تأکید کرد. @majeolat | @Ballaagh

👍3

28 Jul 2026, 10:48 UTC17 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

انتقاد شدید حجت‌الاسلام دانشمند از رواج شایعات درباره ۱۳ صفر @majeolat | @Ballaagh

👏3

28 Jul 2026, 10:12 UTC14 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

تکذیب شایعه کشته شدن یک زن همزمان با اجرای احکام اعدام قاتلان شهدا در اصفهان همزمان با انتشار اخبار اجرای احکام پرونده قتل شهدا در اصفهان، برخی کانال‌ها مدعی کشته‌شدن آناهیتا آذرشب در میدان علیخانی شدند. این ادعا از سوی فرماندهی انتظامی استان اصفهان تکذیب شد و آناهیتا آذرشب نیز با انتشار ویدئویی اعلام کرد زنده است، از منتشرکنندگان این شایعه شکایت خواهد کرد و پلیس از پیگیری قضایی عاملان انتشار اخبار کذب خبر داد. @maj

👍1

27 Jul 2026, 06:41 UTC13 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

توییت منتسب به ترامپ درباره قالیباف ساختگی است تصویر منتسب به توییت ترامپ درباره دیدار با قالیباف، با استفاده از ابزارهای هوش مصنوعی تولید و در شبکه‌های اجتماعی منتشر شده است. افزون بر این، خود توییت نیز جعلی بوده و تاریخ درج‌شده برای آن به سال ۲۰۲۵ تعلق دارد. @majeolat | @Ballaagh

26 Jul 2026, 12:05 UTC10 viewsread 12 August 2026

صداوسیما: ادعای بی‌توجهی به مصاحبه‌های عراقچی با آمار و مستندات همخوانی ندارد سازمان صداوسیما در واکنش به اظهارات عراقچی تأکید کرد طی ماه‌های اخیر همه فعالیت‌ها، دیدارها و مصاحبه‌های خارجی وزیر امور خارجه پوشش داده شده و آمار منتشرشده نشان می‌دهد اخبار و مواضع وزارت امور خارجه بیشترین سهم را در میان وزارتخانه‌ها داشته است. @majeolat | @Ballaagh

26 Jul 2026, 10:39 UTC9 viewsread 12 August 2026

سپاه به برداشت‌های نادرست از بیانیه اخیر پاسخ داد سردار محبی، سخنگوی سپاه، تأکید کرد منظور از عبارت «آتش‌بس‌های فریبنده» در بیانیه سپاه، هشدار به آمریکا درباره سابقه فریبکاری این کشور است، نه اینکه ایران یا سپاه در روند تفاهم فریب خورده باشند. آمریکا از این فرصت آنطور که گفته می‌شود استفاده نکرد اما ما از این فرصت استفاده کردیم، توان خودمان را افزایش دادیم @majeolat | @Ballaagh

22 Jul 2026, 11:44 UTC42 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

ویدئوی زاویه باز، نشانه دیگری از ساختگی بودن تصویر منتشرشده ارائه می کند. باد شدید هم در فیلم مشخص است که، جعل هوش مصنوعی را آشکارتر کرد! جهت باد شدید >> جهت حرکت مه پاش های جعلی << @majeolat | @Ballaagh

22 Jul 2026, 10:57 UTC13 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

تصویر منتسب به «پشت صحنه بازدید از جنوب» جعلی از آب درآمد تصویری که برخی رسانه‌ها با عنوان «پشت صحنه بازدید نمایشی حامیان جنگ از جنوب» منتشر کرده‌اند و در آن امکانات خنک‌کننده و پذیرایی مفصل دیده می‌شود، جعلی است و با هوش مصنوعی از بخشی از تصویر واقعی حضور کارشناسان تلویزیونی در منطقه ساخته شده است. @majeolat | @Ballaagh

👍1

21 Jul 2026, 13:21 UTC14 viewsread 12 August 2026

پشت‌پرده فیلتر فوتبال ۳۶۰؛ ادعای ارتباط با انتقاد از قلعه‌نویی رد شد پس از جنجال‌های فراوان، روایت‌های منتشرشده حاکی از آن است که توقف فعالیت فوتبال ۳۶۰ ارتباطی با انتقادهای فنی از تیم ملی نداشته و شکایت‌های حقوقی و حواشی برنامه در گفتگو با علیرضا فغانی، علت اصلی این اقدام بوده است. @majeolat | @Ballaagh

17 Jul 2026, 19:16 UTC17 viewsread 12 August 2026

ادعای عملیات تیپ ۶۵ نوهد در اقلیم کردستان تأیید رسمی ندارد در ساعات گذشته برخی کانال‌ها و رسانه‌های غیررسمی با انتشار خبری منتسب به بیانیه ارتش، مدعی اجرای عملیات تیپ ۶۵ نوهد در اقلیم کردستان عراق شدند. با این حال، تا زمان انتشار گزارش هیچ تأیید رسمی از سوی ارتش جمهوری اسلامی ایران یا دیگر منابع معتبر درباره این ادعا منتشر نشده است. @majeolat | @Ballaagh

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @majeolat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 454,772 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“❌ مجعولات” (@majeolat), 12 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/majeolat.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.