Channel
@maisiedelight
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
47subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001554988978 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @maisiedelight |
| Description | since : 15. 03. 2022 for collab or anything : @maisiedelightbot instagram.com/maisiedelight |
| Created | 11 March 2022 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/maisiedelight |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:18 | 47 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:03 | 47 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 11 March 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 February 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
♡ ❍ ⌲ •• ⎙ present by: @offcolmar ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ Spe¢ial tag:: @inipengkudeta @glorexofc @untoldrpw @theberriescotch @OFCCIRCLEGZ @ofcsedjooli @pansoer @weareclarivie @OFCBARLAGA @TheWooknka @portaceopici @LIONSTARTGANK @ofclefgirl @ofckarmasutra @remanofc @pandhewi @sencaz @widrags @WTMOFC @OFFICIALCREW71 @merakjat @bracoxboys @sampoerna6mild @blazbor @ofcmoncler @us…
happy independence day🫶🏻
buat yang ke kick pas pembersihan tadi, tolong lepas atb maisie ya. makasiii
nama sephora tetep kita locked sebagai identitas sq ya.
Photo, posted without a caption
maisie open collab ya. untuk contact nya bisa hubungin ke @maisiedelightbot
mampus telat kita udah klos😘
‼️Maisie on locked‼️ 1. lady gaga ( 1-10-2022) 2. tangled (15-03-2022) 3. margot robbie (31-03-2023) 4. scarlett johansson (31-03-2023) 5. maisie peters (10-02-2023) 6. regal academy (17-07-2023) Pihak kami melarang keras untuk tidak mengcopy locked an yg sudah di buat oleh sephora. So, gunakan ide kalian sendiri untuk mencari konsep lain selain konsep yg sudah kami locked‼️ Thanks 💌🫶🏻
⌕ Information about maisie ݈݇- ✮ Official : @maisiedelight ✮ Archive : @inimaisiecantik ✮ Collab : @maisiecollab ✮ Contact / collab : @maisiedelightbot ✮ Instagram : instagram.com/maisiedelight
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
︎︎ ★ MAISIEDELIGHT ★ ︎︎ hey siisst! we're maisiedelight a modern squad looking forra cutie ladies to join us. using MAISIE as theme. founded by all crew and officially born on march 15th 2022. we have locked "153 & ꩇׁׅ ɑï꯱ïꫀ" as identity. and we also have Slogan too that reads " MAISIE'S PRETTY JOURNEY ﹆𓂅ഒ𓍼ഒ⋆ " don't accept copy cat ‼️
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @maisiedelight. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 840,296 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 30 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@maisiedelight named 16 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MAISIEDELIGHT” (@maisiedelight), 47 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/maisiedelight.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.