Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Mahsa Arts

Channel

Mahsa Arts

@mahsaa_arts

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

198subscribers

+51 since we began measuring on 3 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002012073923
TypeChannel
Username@mahsaa_arts
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded3 September 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mahsaa_arts

Growth

147198172.53 September 2026 — 147 subscribers3 September 2026 — 147 subscribers3 September 2026 — 148 subscribers11 September 2026 — 198 subscribers3 September 202611 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 9 days, net +51. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 139–206 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 22:01198+50
3 Sept 2026, 09:42148+1
3 Sept 2026, 01:15147no change
3 Sept 2026, 01:00147first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 23 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
31.1%
avg views ÷ 198 subscribers
Avg views / post
61.5
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.85%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held14 (23 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total861
Reactions total59
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 01:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 03s
Average length
32s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

59 reactions across 14 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52873651022935190521627.1%
custom 5260276777917387792813.6%
custom 532589101477318549358.47%
custom 542030004811626004258.47%
custom 598351508262407919458.47%
👏46.78%
👌35.08%
👍35.08%
custom 541559477400453648323.39%
custom 542035473163986876623.39%
custom 542236987016558489823.39%
🥰23.39%
custom 544064495601009036511.69%
❤‍🔥11.69%

Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 23 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 16:50 UTC20 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026

⭐ هُنر چیزی نیست که فقط دیده شود، باید در تو اتفاق بیوفتد. گاهی یک نُت، یک رَنگ، یک نِگاه ... و ناگهان چیزی درونت برای همیشه تغییر می‌کند. ⭐@mahsaa_arts

👏1custom 52873651022935190521

1 Sept 2026, 17:09 UTC36 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🦇 برای کسی که قلبتون رو خرد کرده، هیچ انتقامی بهتر از این نیست که رهاش کنید و در رو برای اتفاق‌های تازه‌ای که قراره تو زندگیتون در زمان درستش قدم بزارن، باز کنید. ⭐@mahsaa_arts

👍2

31 Aug 2026, 19:14 UTC50 views7 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🖼️ 5 راز عجیبِ تابلو Las Meninas اثر دیه‌گو ولاسکز (تابلویی که انگار به ما نگاه می‌کند!) 👀 اثر معروف دیه‌گو ولاسکز در نگاه اول یک صحنه‌ی معمولی از زندگی دربار اسپانیاست. اما اگر کمی دقیق‌تر نگاه کنیم، اتفاق‌های جالبی در آن می‌بینیم... 🫨 1. چه کسی دارد به چه کسی نگاه می‌کند؟ چند نفر از شخصیت‌های تابلو مستقیماً به بیرون نگاه می‌کنند. دقیقاً به جایی که ما، تماشاگرها، ایستاده‌ایم. انگار مرز بین نقاشی و دنیای واقعی برای

custom 53258910147731854934👍1custom 52873651022935190521custom 54155947740045364831

31 Aug 2026, 18:59 UTC47 views4 reactionsread 3 September 2026

درود دوستان بخش جدیدی رو میخوام به چنل اضافه کنم که راجبه داستان و رازهای پشت آثار : امیدوارم دوستش داشته باشین (خودم که این بخش رو خیلی دوست دارم 🥹) این پستا کمک میکنن هم اثر ها (اسم تابلو ها) و هم هنرمنداشونو یاد بگیرین ☺️💛 میتونین با هشتگ #داستان_پشت_آثار و #Art_Stories دنبالشون کنید ❤

👌3custom 59835150826240791941

30 Aug 2026, 08:41 UTC54 views4 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

- چی خوشحالت میکنه؟ + من: ⭐ @mahsaa_arts

🥰2❤‍🔥1custom 54223698701655848981

29 Aug 2026, 09:29 UTC62 views4 reactionsread 3 September 2026
File

📚 کتاب : شور زندگی ✍️ اثر : ایروینگ استون ✅ ترجمه فارسی 💕 از کانال هنری : ⭐ @mahsaa_arts

custom 52873651022935190524

29 Aug 2026, 09:28 UTC65 views5 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

💕 ونسان ون‌گوگ برای بعضی‌ها فقط یک نقاش دیوانه بود. اما پشت هر ضربه‌ی قلم‌مو، آدمی بود که با تمام وجود می‌خواست زندگی کند، دوست بدارد و خلق کند. کتاب Lust for Life روایت همین زندگی پرآشوب و رابطه عمیق او با برادرش، تئو است. از روزهای تاریک و شکست‌ها تا لحظه‌هایی که رنگ و نور، تنها راه ون‌گوگ برای حرف زدن با جهان بودند. 🤩 📚 کتاب : شور زندگی ✍️ اثر : ایروینگ استون #معرفی_کتاب #شور_زندگی ⭐ @mahsaa_arts

custom 52873651022935190524custom 52602767779173877921

28 Aug 2026, 12:26 UTC84 views4 reactionsread 3 September 2026

درود دوستان 💖 برای دسترسی راحت‌تر به فیلم، کتاب، زندگینامه‌ها و تاریخ‌ هنر داخل چنل میتونید از هشتگ های زیر استفاده کنید. #معرفی_کتاب #پیشنهاد_فیلم #زندگینامه #تاریخ_هنر #داستان_پشت_آثار #Art_Stories #Biography #Art_History #Music 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ ⭐ @mahsaa_arts

custom 52602767779173877921custom 52873651022935190521custom 54203000481162600421custom 59835150826240791941

27 Aug 2026, 07:30 UTC88 views7 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

❔اما چرا این نقاشی‌ها را می‌کشیدند؟ هنوز پاسخ قطعی نداریم. احتمالاً این آثار با مناسک، آیین‌ها و باورهای انسان‌های آن زمان، روایت و انتقال اطلاعات، یا نوعی ارتباط با دنیای اطرافشان بوده است. ❗️نکته‌ی جالب اینجاست که این نقاشی‌ها فقط «تصویر کشیدن ساده» نبودند. هنرمندان آن دوره از خطوط طبیعی غار، حجم دیواره، سایه‌روشن و حتی حالت بدن حیوانات استفاده می‌کردند تا حس حرکت و زندگی ایجاد کنند. حتی در بعضی غارها، اثر دست

👏2custom 52873651022935190522custom 52602767779173877921custom 54203000481162600421custom 59835150826240791941

27 Aug 2026, 07:28 UTC79 views5 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🌱 وقتی انسان شروع به خلق کردن کرد... اگر بخواهیم تاریخ هنر را از ابتدا شروع کنیم، باید به دوران پیشاتاریخ برگردیم. زمانی که هنوز خط، شهر و تمدن‌های بزرگ به وجود نیامده بودند. 🟡انسان‌های آن دوره، روی دیواره‌ی غارها تصاویری از اسب، گاو وحشی، گوزن، شیر و دیگر حیوانات می‌کشیدند. بعضی از این آثار حدود 40 هزار سال قدمت دارند. 🟣یکی از شگفت‌انگیزترین نمونه‌ها در غار لاسکو (Lascaux) و شووه (Chauvet) در فرانسه دیده می‌شود.

custom 52602767779173877921custom 52873651022935190521custom 54203000481162600421custom 54203547316398687661custom 54223698701655848981

26 Aug 2026, 17:27 UTC65 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026

💥میخوام شروع کنم و تاریخ هنر رو به چنل اضافه کنم، پس اگه دوست دارین تاریخ هنر رو یاد بگیرین پستای چنلو با #تاریخ_هنر یا #Art_History دنبال کنین 🥰 و میتونین برای ارتباط با ادمین به دایرکت چنل پیام بدین 🌷

custom 52602767779173877922custom 54203000481162600421

26 Aug 2026, 10:13 UTC66 views6 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

این خیلی زیبا بود 🤩 براتون گذاشتمش چون شاید نیاز داشته باشین این حرف‌هارو بشنوید ... پس استمرار داشته باش و ادامه بده ⭐️ ⭐ @mahsaa_arts

custom 52873651022935190522👏1custom 52602767779173877921custom 53258910147731854931custom 54155947740045364831

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @mahsaa_arts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mahsa Arts” (@mahsaa_arts), 198 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mahsaa_arts.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.