Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Miguel Alejandro Hayes

Channel

Miguel Alejandro Hayes

@mahayescuba

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

305subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001366474439
TypeChannel
Username@mahayescuba
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mahayescuba

Growth

305310307.56 August 2026 — 310 subscribers6 August 2026 — 310 subscribers14 August 2026 — 306 subscribers20 August 2026 — 305 subscribers6 August 202620 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 14 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 304–311 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
20 Aug 2026, 21:02305-1
14 Aug 2026, 00:13306-4
6 Aug 2026, 22:18310no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:24310first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 May 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

157 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9057.3%
👍4931.2%
🔥74.46%
👏63.82%
👎31.91%
😢10.637%
😱10.637%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 157reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 May 2024 to 13 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2025, 22:56 UTC390 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

https://open.substack.com/pub/miguelalejandrohayes/p/las-cifras-de-gaesa-y-el-enfoque?r=62yc5j&utm_medium=ios

3

13 Aug 2025, 00:35 UTC388 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Cada vez hay que trabajar más y cada vez hay más contenido para consumir. Qué mundo más loco!

3

7 Oct 2024, 02:59 UTC863 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026

El daño antropológico no es adorar a un artista repartero (ni que en los roqueros no hubiese casos de drogas y violencia también). El daño antropológico es querer decirle a esos que adoran al Taiger a quién tienen que adorar y a quién no. Además, casi despreciarlos por no ser instrumentos de una lucha política y porque hayan preferido movilizarse por su artista. No se engañen, la mayoría de los que dicen eso no está

👍125👎2👏1

1 Oct 2024, 11:48 UTC621 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

El filósofo Daniel Dennett propuso 4 herramientas para la buena argumentación: (1) reflejar la posición del interlocutor de la mejor forma posible, de modo que el interlocutor pueda decir “Gracias, yo no podría haberlo dicho mejor”; (2) expresar los puntos de acuerdo, no sólo generales, sino también específicos; (3) reconocer lo que se aprendió del interlocutor; (4) sólo entonces, argumentar las críticas y objeciones

8👍1

29 Sept 2024, 15:50 UTC347 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Ayer se dio un buen debate sobre una reforma en Cuba lo Vietnam, incluso, una salida a la rusa. Ahí puse par de comentarios regados, cacofónicos y hasta con un cambio de “exportadora” por “importadora” 🫣, pero el objetivo era exponer brevemente algunas ideas. Tomé esos comentarios, les cambié par de comas y demás para que queden más presentables. Aclaro que no son artículos ni nada parecido; tampoco verdades en piedr

3

29 Sept 2024, 15:50 UTC443 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Por otro lado, cabe preguntarse si, al caer políticamente el sistema, se puede jaquear la legalidad para quitarle las empresas privadas a los militares. Posibilidad que se complica porque estos militares no han hecho los negocios solos, sino que junto con grandes capitales no cubanos. Mero ejemplo: el hotel X, propiedad de Gaesa explotado por la compañía Y (del primer mundo) está en un terreno de Gaesa. Tumbar el neg

5

28 Sept 2024, 16:26 UTC237 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Me acabo de dar cuenta que hay quien cree que desaparecí (metafóricamente hablando) porque acá no sale mucho. Eso, en realidad, no me molesta particularmente, sino que, al contrario, me dice que hay gente que sigue este canal todavía. Por tanto, tengo una buena razón para seguir poniendo acá todas las publicaciones, artículos, entrevistas en radio y TV en las que participo. Y así será.

👍1211

28 Sept 2024, 16:16 UTC251 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Hasta el otro día, como quien dice, la carrera de Filosofía en Cuba se llamaba Filosofía Marxista-Leninista. Básicamente, eso dijo el título de esa carrera durante décadas. Durante sus inicios, por supuesto, era un programa cargado de dogmas. Más que dogmas políticos, eran dogmas metodológicos (que son peores, aunque gente no tenga ni remota idea de lo que hablo). Con el paso del tiempo, el marxismo-leninismo se fue

6👍4

23 Sept 2024, 13:21 UTC313 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

“Notas sobre el financiamiento de las pymes en Cuba y su relación con los bancos del país” Función de un banco: canalizar recursos financieros de los que los tienen a los que lo podrían necesitar. Es la fuente de financiamiento por excelencia. Desde tiempos inmemoriales, los grandes proyectos se llevan con dinero que adelanta alguien. (Obvio) Además, el crédito no solo costea la inversión, sino que la condiciona en

👍6🔥3👏1

18 Sept 2024, 07:27 UTC291 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/L2FryAhChdfrAEUf/?mibextid=WdyKie

👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mahayescuba. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 633,349 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Miguel Alejandro Hayes” (@mahayescuba), 305 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mahayescuba.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.