Video, posted without a caption
💘5💋4😘2custom 49679013631880092181custom 53866883813820524881custom 54653298295722741621

Channel
@maeszxqq
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
48subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001801799012 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @maeszxqq |
| Description | тт- lisvisqq |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/maeszxqq |
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:32 | 48 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 17 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
147 reactions across 8 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 34 | 23.1% | |
| 💘 | 30 | 20.4% | |
| 🔥 | 17 | 11.6% | |
| 💋 | 14 | 9.52% | |
| custom 5193174403612951189 | 10 | 6.80% | |
| custom 5224731658640443468 | 8 | 5.44% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 3.40% | |
| 🤗 | 5 | 3.40% | |
| custom 4967901363188009218 | 4 | 2.72% | |
| 🍓 | 4 | 2.72% | |
| custom 5386688381382052488 | 3 | 2.04% | |
| custom 5465329829572274162 | 3 | 2.04% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 2.04% | |
| custom 5314283397504319932 | 2 | 1.36% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.36% | |
| 😘 | 2 | 1.36% | |
| 🙉 | 1 | 0.68% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 147reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 17 December 2025 to 10 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Video, posted without a caption
💘5💋4😘2custom 49679013631880092181custom 53866883813820524881custom 54653298295722741621
лпшка
❤🔥5❤4🍓3💘2custom 49679013631880092182💋1🤗1🙉1
чтоооооо
🔥7💘6❤3👏2🍓1custom 49679013631880092181custom 54653298295722741621
🙀🙀
💘7❤4🤗3💋1custom 53866883813820524881custom 54653298295722741621
😍
custom 51931744036129511895💘3custom 52247316586404434683❤2💋2custom 53142833975043199321
🎁
💘7❤4custom 51931744036129511894custom 52247316586404434684custom 53142833975043199321
🫢🫢
❤8🔥6💋3😍2🤗1custom 51931744036129511891custom 52247316586404434681
🫂🫦
❤9🔥4💋3😍1
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @maeszxqq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,478,641 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“машуляя” (@maeszxqq), 48 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/maeszxqq.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.