Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Очень надо жить изо всех сил

Channel

Очень надо жить изо всех сил

@madwomen

On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

8,066subscribers

-25 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001058605663
TypeChannel
Username@madwomen
Created29 July 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/madwomen

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “Очень надо! — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Growth

8,0668,0918,078.55 August 2026 — 8,091 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,091 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,087 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,078 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,072 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,066 subscribers5 August 202616 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 10 days, net -25. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,062–8,095 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 08:488,066-6
12 Aug 2026, 18:078,072-6
9 Aug 2026, 17:218,078-9
6 Aug 2026, 22:538,087-4
6 Aug 2026, 03:048,091no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:208,091first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 8 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.7%
avg views ÷ 8,066 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,670
1 post measured
Reaction rate
4.73%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held12 (8 March 20263 August 2026)
Views total1,670
Reactions total79
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 16:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,408 reactions across 12 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,03373.4%
🎉26018.5%
😢845.97%
🤔312.20%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,408reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 8 March 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 12 we hold a reading for · 67%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @madwomen. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 March 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 05:14 UTC≈1,670 views79 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Не так давно знакомый пожаловался на то что, он раньше писал жене фанфики чтоб она на них дрочила. А теперь, она секститься с твитерским Grok и не притрагивается к творчеству муженька. Спустя пару недель решила протестировать Грока, так ли он хорош. И вот, спустя пол часа и пару оргазмов, дрожащими руками оплатила подписку на два месяца… Кароч, если вы любите сальные корявенько написаные рассказы в качестве контент

🎉52🤔17😢73

15 Jul 2026, 09:50 UTC≈3,240 views112 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Когда я работала в офисе большой веселой порно-корпы, меня иногда сдавали в аренду в другие продукты под крылом бренда. И вот однажды меня сдали в штуку, которой пользуются чтобы без палева смотреть всякое в интернете. На мне была задача: написать серию рассылок для юзеров чтобы (я не помню что). И я тогда написала ДИКО угарные рассылки, которые конечно-же никто не апрувнул и я их переписала на скучный и сдержанный л

90🎉22

1 Jul 2026, 11:23 UTC≈3,590 views126 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Представляете, спустя три веселых года существования на рынке у нас появился сайт)))))))) https://elfie.agency/ балансировали между моим неудержимым желанием ебанутого дизайна и прикладными нуждами. Вышло нарядно, все хвалят. Вы тоже похвалите пожалуйста.

91🎉29🤔6

20 May 2026, 19:25 UTC≈4,760 views205 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Проводила сезон срезанных цветов закатными пионами 🥀

200🎉5

12 May 2026, 06:37 UTC≈10,400 views169 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Это было великое приключение. За 5 месяцев без банкинга я пообщалась и проходила бесконечные KYC наверное с 30 людьми из условной "серой зоны". Знаете, вот эти все, Мальтийские банки, приватный фемили офис в Лихтенштейне, офис на Кипре но iban будет немного ебаный, да мы сейчас в Дубае одобрили вам банк за какие то смешные 8% от годового оборота и открытие счета будет стоить сущие гроши 10-20 тысяч долларов. Нет, о

🎉10069

28 Apr 2026, 07:27 UTC≈4,240 views64 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026

Но в то же время, адалт это мой панк-рок и я горяче люблю эту индустрию и всех в ней. Но я влетала в нее не из нужды, а очень осознано с желанием делать лютый угар. Но из того что я увидела за это время, это скорее исключение, к сожалению.

55😢6🤔3

28 Apr 2026, 07:20 UTC≈4,300 views52 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Как человек который работает в адалте уже 9 год, абсолютно согласна с каждым словом. https://t.me/dolegovna/13007

35😢16🤔1

30 Mar 2026, 11:46 UTC≈5,180 views132 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Самое тупое и бесящее осознание последнего времени это то что нельзя совсем все делегировать. Есть ряд неприятных жизненных штук которые будут ну очень "платные" если забить, посыпать деньгами и оставить без присмотра. Например: психотерапию можно делегировать до определенного момента, пока ты сама не научилась себя урегулировать и закрывать все протечки крыши. Современные методы психотерапии это 1-2 года усиленой

106😢21🎉5

25 Mar 2026, 08:33 UTC≈7,020 views74 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ну шо, с днем когда наше предприятие открывает двери для свежей крови. Это уникальная возможность поработать в порно не снимая штанишек. Вакансия: Менеджер по холодным продажам в Elfie Agency. Она подойдет для тех кто хочет попробовать стартануть в новой для себя нише. Либо для опытного аутричера которому хочется новых угарных свершений. Работа зачастую монотонная, но благлдаря сфере не скучная :) Кто нахуй: Elfie

53😢21

10 Mar 2026, 15:51 UTC≈4,540 views79 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Если что, рекламу на порнхабе не запретили 😎 А вы знаете, кто ей командует 😜

60🎉13🤔4😢2

10 Mar 2026, 15:50 UTC≈4,360 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @influencealive

Подъехало официальное заявление ФАС. Официально запрещается реклама в Телеграм, на Ютубе, в Вотсаппе, в Инстаграме (по поправкам к закону о рекламе от 1 сентября 2025 года). Полная цитата ниже. Я думаю, рынок будет переходить на новые форматы рекламы: нативную, скрытую и так далее. Без еридов, без меток. Сейчас такое активно происходит в инстаграме. Рандомные штрафы станут нормальной практикой для рекламодателей и б

13😢5

8 Mar 2026, 06:25 UTC≈3,900 views298 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

8 марта для меня самый важный праздник в году, исключая личные. Очень трепетно люблю и вдохновляюсь всеми девами, которые меня окружают. Дамы, мы сила и мощь, которая возрождает этот мир, пока безумные дядьки тащат его во мрак. Желаю вам простого женского счастья: мирного неба, свободы политических заключённых и чтобы этатистская машина перестала мешать вашему бизнесу и повседневной жизни. С днём солидарности женщ

258🎉34😢6

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @madwomen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 918,685 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Очень надо жить изо всех сил” (@madwomen), 8,066 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/madwomen.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.