Channel

madrobot

@madrobottalks

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

127subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1001859558026
Type	Channel
Username	@madrobottalks
Description	Personal channel of so called madrobot about engineering, management, leadership and pasta cooking
Created	Between 1 October 2022 and 2 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded	9 August 2026
Last confirmed live	9 August 2026
Measurements held	2
On Telegram	t.me/madrobottalks

Growth

2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 126–128 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
9 Aug 2026, 02:01	127	no change
7 Aug 2026, 22:22	127	first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 2 September 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos: 6
Videos: 1
Links: 8

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime: 30s
Average length: 30s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

140 reactions across 18 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction	Count	Share
🔥	65	46.4%
❤	46	32.9%
👍	21	15.0%
🎉	4	2.86%
🤔	2	1.43%
👾	1	0.714%
🙏	1	0.714%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 140reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 2 September 2023 to 22 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Mar 2026, 09:53 UTC109 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Forwarded from @levinsonai

Многие пишут что в ближайшие несколько лет профессия программиста будет полностью заменена АИ. Скептики такой идеи говорят что если позволить АИ создавать большие проекты то нагенерированные сотни тысяч строк кода быстро превращаются в огромную бессмысленную мешанину из странного кода и багов. В марте вышла статья ( https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.03823 ) из Алибабы, которая анонсирует новый бенчмарк (SWE-CI), цель бенчм…

❤8

19 Jan 2026, 10:17 UTC160 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Video

Beautiful visualization of next token prediction by LLMs created by Santiago Ortiz - https://moebio.com/mind/. Recently I've been exploring a lot how some complicated data structures can be visualized in intuitive ways to give more intuition about the structure and the insights the data carries. In my case I'm researching how we can visualize what we know about a certain domain when we study it and how our knowledge…

🔥3

13 Jan 2026, 10:32 UTC194 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

How to prepare for EM interviews being an individual contributor? Had a coffee chat with my wife on this topic in the morning. She is interviewing potential EMs and there is quite a difference between interviewing existing EMs vs ICs who want to become EMs. In the EM interviews we have 3 main pillars: People, Technology and Processes. As an IC you don't manage people, you might not fully drive tech objectives and y…

🔥7❤2

7 Dec 2025, 14:39 UTC179 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

How much information goes to waste? There are moments when I try to recall a book I read long ago to realize that almost nothing remains. No facts, no details. But then I notice something else: if some idea stayed with me — a pattern, a way of reasoning — the whole reading was still worthwhile. If nothing stayed, then whatever I learned was temporary and just vanished. This made me wonder how often this happens in…

❤3

27 Nov 2025, 16:30 UTC181 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026

#мысливслух Сходил в тренажерный зал и понял, что не был там почти месяц. Такая же ситуация с бильярдом и с парой других занятий. А пару дней назад, меня затянула интересная задача и я над ней работал до 2х ночи. С одной стороны здорово, что работа сейчас настолько интересная, что я теряю счет времени. С другой, практика (и менеджерский опыт) показывает, что это прямая дорога в перегорание. Мы привыкли слышать про п…

🔥9❤2

23 Nov 2025, 16:36 UTC271 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Photo

Почему мы упорно учимся одним вещам, но бросаем другие? Почему одному ученику нравится математика или физика, а другой их ненавидит? Меня давно волнуют эти вопросы — особенно аспект, который, как мне кажется, объясняет очень многое: мотивация. В образовательной теории существует множество подходов к объяснению мотивации учащихся. Но когда речь идёт о цифровых образовательных средах, я считаю, что особенно выделяются…

❤9🔥2🙏1

26 Oct 2025, 09:02 UTC294 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Photo

Это медоед. В корпоративном мире и в BigTech в частности - не плохая стратегия быть медоедом. Дело в том, что они очень тупые и часто вступают схватку с группой гиен, львов, слонов и вообще лакомятся ядовитыми кобрами. Чему нас учат медоеды? Тупым быть легче! Шучу) Они нас учат тому, что не надо бояться рисковать. Я видел много людей (включая себя), которые не брались за крутые проекты, просто потому что считали, чт…

🔥16❤1

16 Mar 2025, 05:12 UTC307 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Кофе 3в1 Приехали в Японию. Взял латте в банке в 7 eleven. Сделал глоток, и перенесся в 2011 год. Иду после учебы на подработку к отцу в офис. Завариваю кофе 3в1 с молоком и сахаром и пытаюсь стать программистом пока не закончил университет на финансиста. Мучаю Hibernate (фреймворк для бд), хотя не хватает знаний по самим базам данных. Разбираюсь с hibernate, но в итоге где-то memory leak и так далее. Не оставляет ч…

❤10

23 Jan 2025, 13:24 UTC306 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Came around an interesting topic while reading educational theory - threshold concepts. Those concepts are core ideas within a discipline that, once understood, transform the learner's perspective and give them a fundamentally new way of thinking about that subject. Formal definition of limits or completeness is an example from analysis and is foundational for theorems that follow. Examples from computer science coul…

👍6🤔2👾1

23 Oct 2024, 11:58 UTC287 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Forwarded from @cpfed

🎬 nFactorial Originals және AstanaHub спорттық бағдарламалау туралы деректі фильмді ұсынады! «Задача D. Как спортивное программирование меняет мир?» фильмі бізді Астанада өткен ICPC Worls Finals 2024 Халықаралық бағдарламалау олимпиадасының оқиғаларын еске салады. Фильмде ICPC қатысу қатысушылардың өмірін, олардың мансап жолдарын қалай өзгерткенін және біздің болашағымызды қалыптастыратын инновацияларға қалай шабыт …

❤2

15 Sept 2024, 12:19 UTC233 viewsread 9 August 2026

Very packed week ahead of us - ICPC World Finals, various events and Strategic sessions for 2025. Stay tuned and see you in Astana!

15 Sept 2024, 12:15 UTC208 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Forwarded from @cpfedPhoto

Finally, what we've been waiting for! The 2024 ICPC World Finals in Astana starts tomorrow 🎉 Teams from all over the world will gather together at the EXPO IEC to take on a series of challenges and find out who is the best 🏆 ➖ Көптен күткен сәт келді! Ертең Астанада 2024 ICPC World Finals бәсекесі басталады 🎉 Әлемнің барлық түкпірінен қатысушылар ЕХРО кешенінде жиналып, түрлі сынақтар арқылы үздіктерді анықтайды🏆…

🔥5👍2❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @madrobottalks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 822,229 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Kazakhstan CP Federation
@cpfed · 3,1223 posts ML.Engineering.AI
@levinsonai · 1181 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Anuar SERIKOV
@aserikov · 1,3571 post

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

Anuar SERIKOV
@aserikov · 1,3571 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“madrobot” (@madrobottalks), 127 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/madrobottalks.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.