Отдыхаю от MW (плюс лимит исчерпан, сброс 8 августа), поэтому собрал второй колокольчик (заодно оттер кровь со стола ^_^), и сделат часть коммутации у Project Diva контроллера. Также достал с полки две Тошки Текры: они уже больше года ждут своего часа. Надо обе разобрать до основания, и собрать из двух одну, в корпусе поприличнее. Увы, экран рабочий только один, да и повреждения на одном корпусе слишком серьезные. Вт…

Channel
MadCat's Retro Channel
@madcatse
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
147subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001682835544 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @madcatse |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 20 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 20 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/madcatse |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:43 | 147 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:16 | 148 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:22 | 148 | first reading |
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 62.8%
- avg views ÷ 147 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 92.3
- 8 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 4.91%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 8
- of 8 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (30 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 738 |
| Reactions total | 33 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 20:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 14m 43s
- Average length
- 4m 54s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
33 reactions across 7 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 12 | 36.4% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 27.3% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 12.1% | |
| 💊 | 2 | 6.06% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 6.06% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 3.03% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 3.03% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 3.03% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 3.03% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Ну что, весьма и весьма большой прогресс по МВ. -полностью реализован сюжет. Прямо до финального боя (увы, дальше пока не могу, потому что надо пройти финальный бой в оригинале, и посмотреть что там дальше происходит). Все развилки на месте, все сообщения по новостной ленте приходят как и полагается. -реализованы биомы планет. Теперь каждая планета имеет свой биом, причем это видно в главном меню и в баре; -игра начи…
🔥2👍1
Обещанный обзор :) немного тяп-ляп, но ничего лучше встроенного в ноутбук микрофона нет.
👍2🔥1
Обзора не получилось, зато треть сюжета уже в игре! С обилием развилок и тупиков тестирование сюжета становится все сложнее и дольше, но конец уже виден :) Мы вскрыли алгоритм и общий ход сюжета, так что дальше работа чисто по механической отладке. Увы, сейвов пока нет, так что чем дальше в сюжет, тем дольше каждый цикл :)
🔥1
Медленно вскрываю сюжетку Mechwarrior 1989. Работу с контрактами закончил, вместо вывода в 3д-бой пока экран-заглушка, которая имитирует исход боя. По сути сюжет это единственная оставшаяся большая часть 2д-игры. Сюжет, и сохранения. Доделаю сюжет, его статусы и флаги, и скорее всего весь сейв будет полностью раскрыт, и реализовать его в игре можно будет парой промптов. Останется самое жуткое - как-то начать писать 3…
🔥4
Минутка юмора, поднять настроение :) - А чем винамп плох? - Тем, что винамп старше слушателя. Молодое поколение не любит слушать старших.
😁4👍3❤1🔥1🤣1🥰1
Второй колокольчик в строю. А я из строя выбыл, сейчас в травмпункте. По совершено идиотской причине: пытался подточить его крышку пластиковую, чтобы можно было сигнальный кабель нормально воткнуть ( коннектор дб15, шире чем его родной), делал это канцелярским ножом; нож соскочил и срезал кусок кожи с безымянного пальца. Сейчас наложили повязку, впереди пара недель боли и без особого использования левой руки. Какой ж…
💊2😢2🤯1
Занялся вторым колокольчиком. Больше часа потратил чтобы отцепить пластиковую рамку от трубки, охххх! Но все получилось, более-менее. Заодно ткнулся в плату, и очень и очень возможно что нашел причину -14в вместо -40в. И это довольно удивительная причина (см. видео) :)
👍3🔥3
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @madcatse. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 212,406 of 1,584,733entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MadCat's Retro Channel” (@madcatse), 147 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/madcatse.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.