Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Мадаминов

Channel

Мадаминов

@madaminov391

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

19subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002695989750
TypeChannel
Username@madaminov391
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 24 April 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/madaminov391

Growth

182320.57 August 2026 — 18 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18 subscribers24 August 2026 — 21 subscribers31 August 2026 — 23 subscribers10 September 2026 — 20 subscribers17 September 2026 — 19 subscribers197 August 202617 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 41 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17–24 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 22:1619-1
10 Sept 2026, 09:0020-3
31 Aug 2026, 09:0423+2
24 Aug 2026, 13:4921+3
11 Aug 2026, 18:4618no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:3818first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 24 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
25s
Average length
6s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

670 reactions across 16 posts, in 53 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 9.55% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥649.55%
😁517.61%
👍507.46%
🕊284.18%
💔274.03%
custom 5330497650665998885243.58%
custom 5323383900628599715233.43%
🔥233.43%
custom 5323811666486379562223.28%
custom 5323278888678210739213.13%
🍓213.13%
🤷‍♂213.13%
custom 5381933380138975753162.39%
🌚162.39%
🗿162.39%
😈152.24%
🤝152.24%
🖕142.09%
custom 5395818232017872233131.94%
custom 5424832166326462528131.94%
33 further kinds17726.4%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 670 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 April 2025 to 26 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
131
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 19 we hold a reading for · 58%
Most on one post
62
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @madaminov391. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 April 2025 to 26 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Mar 2026, 17:36 UTC≈1,490 views0 reactions62 Starsread 11 August 2026

Eplasang ajaldan sal oldinro kel Kaftimni kaftinga bir bora qoʻyay Men abad kurashdm sensizlik blan Hech yoʻq soʻngimda iforing tuyay..!

23 Sept 2025, 06:43 UTC≈2,380 views56 reactions20 Starsread 11 August 2026

Любовь — это не владение человеком, а умение быть рядом, оставаясь свободными

custom 532338390062859971523custom 53232788886782107398custom 53819333801389757537🍓6custom 53955023930078277175custom 53305466261780643353custom 53503903844029181633custom 53955240654128033481

19 Aug 2025, 16:24 UTC≈2,130 views57 reactions4 Starsread 11 August 2026
Voice message

Как говорят: Жахонгир Отажонов

custom 532381166648637956222custom 538431616786525561812custom 533049765066599888510custom 53232788886782107396🍓2custom 52449302885381160182custom 53821722833998478972custom 52198519186622043871

Signed исмоилова𓍼ֶָ֢

19 Aug 2025, 09:58 UTCviews —9 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 53503903844029181639

19 Aug 2025, 09:04 UTC≈1,720 views49 reactions6 Starsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😈15custom 53819333801389757539custom 53304976506659988858custom 53957596787287260696custom 53232788886782107394custom 52403474854188369273🍓2custom 52449426666338657972

12 Jul 2025, 20:02 UTC≈1,570 views39 reactions3 Starsread 11 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

💔12custom 53955117818063377239custom 53304976506659988856custom 53233409939053125484🍓2custom 52110511870752920032custom 53955240654128033482custom 53958182320178722332

5 Jul 2025, 14:56 UTC≈1,710 views49 reactions3 Starsread 11 August 2026

Men endi o'tmish bilan yashamaslikka qaror qildim, agar qarzim bo'lsa, kechirasz

❤‍🔥20custom 54248321663264625289🕊6👍4custom 52403474854188369274👌2🥱2😁2

13 Jun 2025, 19:02 UTC≈1,750 views44 reactions3 Starsread 11 August 2026

ман ештган бахонани ештсанг санам куларднг 😅

🤝15🗿9custom 53821722833998478977custom 53232788886782107393custom 53954007826715375353custom 539551178180633772332custom 52110511870752920032

7 Jun 2025, 16:43 UTC≈1,690 views47 reactions3 Starsread 11 August 2026

Жафони битта кўрган Вафони итдан ўрган Жонин бершга таййор булшни синий китдан ўрган

😁22custom 53958182320178722337🤓5custom 54248321663264625284👍3❤‍🔥2👀2👨‍💻2

5 Jun 2025, 16:02 UTC≈1,870 views54 reactions25 Starsread 11 August 2026

Мени севгм сенга дорийди 🩹 Сен уни свича дб ойладнг шеклли...😂

😁27🗿7🕊6🥴4custom 52403474854188369274❤‍🔥2🎄2👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @madaminov391. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мадаминов” (@madaminov391), 19 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/madaminov391.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.