Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Mad Movie 🎬

@mad_movie_xxx

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

139,070subscribers

-261 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001149042405
TypeChannel
Username@mad_movie_xxx
DescriptionАвторский канал про кино для фанатов кино По всем вопросам сотрудничества @Rocketxx РКН заявка № 6651753811 Ресурс включен в перечень Роскомнадзора https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/6970e0f522ea9869005f49a3 #DXRDJ
Created24 January 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mad_movie_xxx

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

139,070139,331139,200.56 August 2026 — 139,331 subscribers6 August 2026 — 139,327 subscribers7 August 2026 — 139,285 subscribers8 August 2026 — 139,250 subscribers9 August 2026 — 139,194 subscribers10 August 2026 — 139,150 subscribers11 August 2026 — 139,108 subscribers12 August 2026 — 139,070 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -261. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 139,031–139,370 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 09:52139,070-38
11 Aug 2026, 12:02139,108-42
10 Aug 2026, 10:50139,150-44
9 Aug 2026, 07:54139,194-56
8 Aug 2026, 05:02139,250-35
7 Aug 2026, 04:55139,285-42
6 Aug 2026, 05:40139,327-4
6 Aug 2026, 04:22139,331first reading

Engagement

134 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.05%
avg views ÷ 139,070 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,850
134 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.86%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
134
of 134 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held134 (5 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total381,926
Reactions total10,937
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 18:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
73,900
Videos
27,000
Links
35,200

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 11m
Average length
1m 51s

Measured directly from 39 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

10,085 reactions across 125 posts, in 36 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3,37133.4%
1,93319.2%
🔥1,13411.2%
🤣8078.00%
🍌4694.65%
🙈4334.29%
🤪4174.13%
😁3173.14%
👏2332.31%
😢1921.90%
🤡1731.72%
💩1601.59%
🎉1161.15%
😱1111.10%
🤮510.506%
🥰290.288%
👎270.268%
💯180.178%
👀120.119%
🥱120.119%
16 further kinds700.694%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 134 of the 134 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,937reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 134 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 134 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mad_movie_xxx. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 134 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTC≈1,900 views36 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Второй сезон «Гангстерлэнд» — новый трейлер продолжения криминального сериала Гая Ричи. Посмотреть на Тома Харди дадут 18 сентября.

👍27🔥4💩2🤡2🙈1

12 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC≈2,840 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Один день из жизни темщика 8:00 Все едут на работу. Он спит. 10:30 Проснулся, потянулся, зашел в Телеграм. Получил сигналы. Открыл БК. Сделал 3 ставки по схеме. Пошёл отдыхать дальше. Через час — +32.400₽ за ставки. Пока завтракал. И это весь его рабочий день. И получает он больше всех, кто пашет на найме Рискует ли он? Нет. Ведь работает только по проверенным схемам из канала TONY BET Схема очень проста и провер

💩122

12 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC≈2,660 views43 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Мы в МАХ 🇷🇺

🤣32😁7🥰21👍1

12 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC≈2,950 views40 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Мы в МАХ 🇷🇺

😁25🤣9👍4👏1🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 14:22 UTC≈3,060 views33 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Марк Уолберг и Ахья Абдул-Матин II в финальном трейлере криминального экшн-триллера Любой ценой (By Any Means). Сюжет: Миссисипи, 60-е годы XX века, опытный киллер и новичок-агент ФБР - вынуждены работать вместе чтобы поймать виновных в гибели гражданских активистов. Премьера - 4 сентября Мы в МАХ 🇷🇺

👍26👏3🥱3🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC≈3,100 views74 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

В суточном опросе Лучший фильм про самолеты победила военно-музыкальная картина Леонида Быкова В бой идут одни "старики" (1973). Фильм рассказывает о "поющей" лётной эскадрильи во времена ВОВ. Интересные факты: -Многие летчики в фильмы имели реальных прототипов. -Существовала в реальности и "поющая эскадрилья". Говорят, 2 самолета для нее "выбил" лично Леонид Утёсов. -Чтобы получить для фильма настоящие самолеты -

👍5214👏4🥰3🙏1

12 Aug 2026, 13:40 UTC≈3,190 views165 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Айла Фишер Красотуля ❤️ Норм 👍 Страшилка 🤪 Мы в МАХ 🇷🇺

👍8454🤪26🗿1

12 Aug 2026, 13:23 UTC≈3,350 views163 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

После успеха "Человека-паука" и "Одиссеи" легендарный актер Том Холланд вошел в TOP-6 самых кассовых актеров. Валовые кассовые сборы актеров: 1. Зои Салдана - $15.47 млрд ​2. Скарлетт Йоханссон - $15.4 млрд ​3. Крис Пратт - $15.16 млрд ​4. Сэмюэл Л.Джексон - $14.61 млрд ​5. Роберт Дауни-мл - $14.32 млрд ​6. Том Холланд - $13.66 млрд Заслужил 👍 НЕ заслужил 🙈 Мы в МАХ 🇷🇺

👍80🙈67🤣65😁5

12 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC≈3,440 views37 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Режиссер Януэль Меркадо рассказал о возможном продолжении мультфильма Кот в сапогах (Puss in Boots). Меркадо: "Я уверен, что в разработке есть много интересного". Пока про Кота в сапогах вышла три полнометражных мультфильма. Ждем 👍 НЕ ждем 🙈 Мы в МАХ 🇷🇺

👍24🙈101🤡1🥱1

12 Aug 2026, 12:40 UTC≈3,600 views140 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Брюс Кэмпбелл рассказал, что ему однажды предложили рассмотреть вариант фильма Фредди против Джейсона против Эша" после успеха фильма "Фредди против Джейсона" (2003). В конце концов, ему не понравилась эта идея. Позже эта концепция была воплощена в серии комиксов. Кто круче? Фредди 🔥 Джейсон 👍 Эш ❤️ Мы в МАХ 🇷🇺

85🔥40👍13🤡2

12 Aug 2026, 12:19 UTC≈3,820 views38 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Антонио Бандерас на кадрах со съемок приключенческого экшн-триллера Во власти страха (Above and Below). Группа друзей отправлятся на море понаблюдать за акулами и позаниматься дайвингом. Но их планы нарушает коварный контрабандист. Премьера в России - завтра Мы в МАХ 🇷🇺

👍28🔥6😱21👏1

12 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC97 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Pitbull ft. Kesha - Timber (remix) (х/ф "Форсаж 8") #КиноПесня Мы в МАХ 🇷🇺

👍2👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 134 posts we hold for @mad_movie_xxx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@mad_movie_xxx edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 August 2026

Polls

The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Aug 2026, 04:00 UTCAnonymous Poll530 voters

Лучший фильм Кейси Аффлека

  1. 11-13 друзей Оушена40%
  2. Как трусливый Роберт Форд убил Джесси Джеймса4%
  3. Как украсть небоскреб4%
  4. Интерстеллар28%
  5. Манчестер у моря10%
  6. И грянул шторм6%
  7. Три девятки5%
  8. Зачинщики2%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Aug 2026, 04:00 UTCAnonymous Poll1,010 voters approx.

Лучший фильм Антонио Бандераса

  1. Интервью с вампиром6%
  2. Отчаянный 1-240%
  3. Наемные убийцы8%
  4. Маска Зорро 1-221%
  5. 13-й воин17%
  6. Дети шпионов 1-33%
  7. Неудержимые 32%
  8. Анчартед: На картах не значится1%
  9. Индиана Джонс и колесо судьбы2%
  10. Приключения Паддингтона 30%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTCAnonymous Poll869 voters

Лучший фильм Билла Скарсгарда

  1. Хемлок Гроув (сериал)2%
  2. ОНО 1-257%
  3. Касл-Рок (сериал)4%
  4. Варвар (2022)1%
  5. Джон Уик 417%
  6. Пацан против всех4%
  7. Ворон (2024)7%
  8. Носферату (2024)3%
  9. Западня (2025)2%
  10. ОНО: Добро пожаловать в Дерри (сериал)4%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Aug 2026, 04:01 UTCAnonymous Poll708 voters

Лучший фильм Эрика Бана

  1. Черный ястреб9%
  2. Халк15%
  3. Троя48%
  4. Мюнхен4%
  5. Звездный путь (СтарТрек, 2009)6%
  6. Жена путешественника во времени5%
  7. Ханна. Совершенное оружие4%
  8. Избави нас от лукавого4%
  9. Меч короля Артура3%
  10. Вершина1%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTCAnonymous Poll180 voters

Лучший фильм Джона Тертлтауба

  1. Три ниндзя3%
  2. Пока ты спал5%
  3. Феномен (1996)2%
  4. Инстинкт (1999)3%
  5. Малыш (2000)3%
  6. Сокровище нации 1-261%
  7. Остров Харпера (сериал)1%
  8. Ученик чародея9%
  9. StarПерцы2%
  10. Мег: Монстр глубины12%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Aug 2026, 04:00 UTCAnonymous Poll631 voters

Лучший фильм Дастина Хоффмана

  1. Соломенные псы (1971)2%
  2. Мотылек (1973)3%
  3. Крамер против Крамер4%
  4. Тутси20%
  5. Человек дождя51%
  6. Капитан Крюк2%
  7. Эпидемия5%
  8. Плутовство1%
  9. Вердикт за деньги0%
  10. Парфюмер: История одного убийцы12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 134 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 442,818 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mad Movie 🎬” (@mad_movie_xxx), 139,070 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mad_movie_xxx.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.