2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 865–867 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Aug 2026, 05:15
866
no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:16
866
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 20 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
34.7%
avg views ÷ 866 subscribers
Avg views / post
301
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
19 (20 June 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
1,503
Reactions total
9
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 00:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
36 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
12
33.3%
🔥
10
27.8%
👍
7
19.4%
😁
6
16.7%
✍
1
2.78%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
50
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
50
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @macsecurity. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Show HN: Run an 80B Qwen in 4.3 GB of RAM on a Mac, and a 35B on an iPhone (Score: 151+ in 15 hours)
Link: https://readhacker.news/s/6ZVvp
Comments: https://readhacker.news/c/6ZVvp
With Virtual Mac, iPad finally breaks free from iPadOS, enabling pro apps like Xcode and Terminal to run directly on device. Но нужен джейл(
https://github.com/nfzerox/VirtualMacOniPad
Официальный GUI для Frida
Вы знали что у Frida появился официальный графический интерфейс - Luma?
Что умеет:
• работа с сессиями: запоминает где вы остановились даже если приложение скрашилось или вы решили вернуться к проекту через неделю
• frida-trace со встроенным редактором
• возможность сохранять запуски и пошагово воспроизводить их с CFG view
• доступ к js-объектам через правый клик: hex dump, disassembly view…
HTTPPocket - Wi-Fi File Server
📚 Раздел: #Файлообмен
📄 Описание:
Приложение превращающий ваш iPhone/iPad в файловый сервер.
Функционал:
- Предоставьте общий доступ к любой папке через локальную сеть Wi-Fi.
- Доступ к файлам из любого веб-браузера
- QR-код для мгновенного подключения
- Ход перевода, скорость и предполагаемое время прибытия в режиме реального времени.
- Просмотр подключенных устройств
- Встроенный ча…
Apple убивает 🏴☠️ на iOS 😭
-
Рано или поздно это должно было случиться.
Что произошло?
• Apple изменила механизм защиты приложений в iOS/iPadOS 26.
Что под ударом?
• Новые приложения, предназначенные только для iOS/iPadOS 26.
Что это значит?
• В будущем это может стать серьёзной проблемой, если не появится новое решение.
-
Отмотаем время назад.
Многие, скорее всего, не следили за этим, но нормального декриптера …
Энтузиаст под ником AlexZorzi запустил эмулятор устройств Apple Silicon прямо на Android-смартфоне — по сути, заставил iOS-виртуалку крутиться на телефоне. В основе лежит форк проекта ChefKiss Inferno (сам производный от QEMU), который автор, по его же признанию, «собрал на скорую руку», лишь бы завелось. Тестовым стендом стал Samsung S26 Ultra на Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 под Android 17. Стабильности и скорости здесь…
В принципе, заголовок и так понятен, но важно, что полного disclosure все еще нет, потому что Apple не спешит чинить проблему
https://cybersecuritynews.com/apple-hide-my-email-vulnerability/
🇷🇺 Сделал кряк на macOS для данной версии IDA Pro! В скором времени он появится здесь, а также будет опубликован на appstorrent.ru.
🇺🇸 I have created a macOS crack for this version of IDA Pro! It will be available here shortly and will also be published on appstorrent.ru.
💻 Перед вами утекший в сеть краш-тест iPhone 18 Pro
Крутые хацкеры взломали индийского подрядчика Apple (и не только) Tata Electronics и слили около 680 ГБ данных, в том числе и касающихся будущего айфона.
Однако Apple оперативно заставила инсайдеров удалить информацию, а индусы заявили, что «бизнес не пострадал» и они уже ведут расследование с независимыми экспертами 🥵
🛍️ Technodeus | Подписаться
😁6✍1
Signed Хозяйн
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @macsecurity. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“iPhone:~ root#” (@macsecurity), 866 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/macsecurity.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.