Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for LUBRICA

Channel

LUBRICA

@machinerylubrication

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

436subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001941085071
TypeChannel
Username@machinerylubrication
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/machinerylubrication

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

436439437.57 August 2026 — 439 subscribers8 August 2026 — 439 subscribers14 August 2026 — 437 subscribers4 September 2026 — 436 subscribers7 August 20264 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 28 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 436–439 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 07:00436-1
14 Aug 2026, 19:14437-2
8 Aug 2026, 05:15439no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:58439first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 00s
Average length
1m 20s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

45 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1226.7%
👍1124.4%
🙏817.8%
511.1%
❤‍🔥48.89%
👌36.67%
🆒12.22%
👏12.22%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 November 2025 to 29 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jan 2026, 20:26 UTC215 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

#اطلاع_رسانی انتشار مقاله جدید در وبلاگ دانش روغنکاری با عنوان "نسل جدید ادتیوهای EP/AW: عبور از روانکاری مرسوم در استخراج معادن مس". این مقاله که با استناد به 18 منبع در 9 صفحه تدوین شده و دارای چهار جدول و یک شکل می باشد که از طریق لینک زیر در دسترس علاقمندان است: https://lubrica.blogsky.com/1404/10/25/post-120/ @machinerylubrication

👍3

Signed A.R. Aminian

8 Jan 2026, 12:41 UTC271 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

پیرو ایراد وارده از طرف نماینده مجلسی بنام خضریان در خصوص خرید عینک های محافظ برای پرسنل زحمتکش و مظلوم پتروشیمی خلیج فارس، شعری از جناب آقای دکتر رمضانی در وصف دست اندرکاران تعمیر و نگهداری را که به درخواست ایشان اندک تصحیحی روی آن انجام داده بودم را تقدیم می دارم...امیدوارم این شعر برای چند لحظه هم که شده تسلای خاطری برای قشر زحمتکش نگهداری و تعمیرات بویژه در صنایع نفت، گاز، و پتروشیمی باشد: هرکجا چرخ زمان بی نفس

👌2👍1

Signed A.R. Aminian

8 Jan 2026, 12:27 UTC233 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🔧 نگهداری بهینه از یاتاقان شروع می‌شود: روانکاری قابل اعتماد عامل تعیین کننده برای عمر مفید هر محلول چرخشی است. اما گریسی که استفاده می‌کنید چقدر مؤثر است و آیا یاتاقان شما از قبل علائم اولیه سایش یا آلودگی را نشان می‌دهد؟ به عنوان یک ارائه دهنده راه حل سیستمی، آنالیز گریس می‌تواند از نظر فنی تصویری پیشرفته از میزان آماده به کاری تجهیز ارائه دهد که امکان ارزیابی دقیق سیستم تریبولوژیکی یاتاقان-روانکار-محیط را به سرع

2

Signed A.R. Aminian

8 Jan 2026, 12:24 UTC146 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

در این اوضاع پرآشوب و در ششمین سالگرد سرنگونی هواپیمای اوکراینی که منجر به داغدار شدن خانواده های بسیار، از جمله دوست عزیزم جناب آقای دکتر قندچی، شد...بپردازیم به آنالیز گریس که در نگهداری و تعمیرات صنایع ایران کنتر بدان توجه شده است👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 @machinerylubrication

❤‍🔥2

Signed A.R. Aminian

6 Jan 2026, 20:53 UTC181 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

علاقمندان به آزمون RPVOT جهت اطلاعات بیشتر و مطالعه یک موردکاوی می توانند به مقاله زیر مراجعه کنند: https://lubrica.blogsky.com/1397/06/03/post-85/ @machinerylubrication

🙏4

Signed A.R. Aminian

6 Jan 2026, 20:50 UTC175 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

هدف اصلی استاندارد ASTM D2272 ارائه یک پارامتر کمی استاندارد است: اندازه‌گیری پایداری اکسیداتیو روغن‌های نو و در حال کار. این آزمایش نمونه را در شرایط شدید دما و فشار، در حضور آب و کاتالیزور مس، قرار می‌دهد تا پیری تسریع‌شده را شبیه‌سازی کند. نتیجه رسمی صرفاً زمان القا است: تعداد دقایقی که لازم است فشار از حداکثر اوج خود 175kPa کاهش یابد. محدودیت رویکرد استاندارد این است که در زمان‌سنج متوقف می‌شود. دو روغن با نتیجه

2👌1

Signed A.R. Aminian

6 Jan 2026, 20:48 UTC154 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

زوایای پنهان آزمون RPVOT براساس ASTM D2272: در حوزه روانکاری، آزمونRPVOT سنگ بنای ارزیابی عمر باقیمانده روغن‌های توربینی است. با این حال، تفاوت عمیقی بین انجام آزمایش «طبق استاندارد» و تفسیر آن «طبق دانش روانکاری» وجود دارد. این مبحثی است که شخصا در سطح پیشرفته آنالیز روغن سالهاست که مشغول آموزش آن هستم. عکس مربوط به آزمایش تایید کیفیت روغن معادل مینرال از طریق RPVOT در آزمایشگاه همکار در ایتالیا @machinerylubricati

3👏1

Signed A.R. Aminian

22 Dec 2025, 12:57 UTC≈2,040 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

تبریک فرارسیدن سال نو میلادی از طرف گروه پژوهشی-آموزشی i-Tribomat @machinerylubrication

Signed A.R. Aminian

29 Nov 2025, 16:26 UTC351 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

راهنمای انتخاب گرید ویسکوزیته روغن موتور براساس استاندارد SAE J300 @machinerylubrication

👍3

Signed A.R. Aminian

25 Nov 2025, 09:40 UTC362 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

👆👆👆 در توضیح این روش کار، البته که برای بازاریابی خوب و پسندیده است! منتها، این روش تست استاندارد نیست. هرچند مراکزی چون دانشگاه کایزرسلاترن، موسسه FZG آلمان، یا دانشگاه ماگدبورگ یا Chalmers اقدام به توسعه روش های تستی برای ارزیابی نحوه عملکرد گریس بین دو یا چند چرخدنده کرده اند، اما این روش ها هیچکدام استاندارد نیستند. برای مقایسه نحوه عملکرد سه گریس فوق، مجموعه تست های زیر باید مدنظر قرار گیرد: - آزمون های پایداری

1

Signed A.R. Aminian

25 Nov 2025, 09:28 UTC314 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

صحنه ایی از نمایش نحوه عملکرد سه نوع گریس تولیدی شرکت "آذر شیمی شریف" که در غرفه این شرکت در یک نمایشگاه با نصب جعبه های شیشه ایی و دو چرخدنده که حرکت تناسبی آنها با توسل به سه نوع گریس پایه آسفالتی، پایه آلومینیوم کمپلکس، و پایه پلیمر روانکاری شده بود. @machinerylubrication

🆒1

Signed A.R. Aminian

19 Nov 2025, 15:31 UTC284 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

هفدهمین کنفرانس ملی مهندسی نگهداشت و مدیریت دارایی های فیزیکی در روزهای سه شنبه و چهارشنبه بیست و هفتم و بیست و هشتم آبان 1404 در پژوهشکده مهندسی خودرو دانشگاه علم و صنعت برگزار شد. @machinerylubrication

Signed A.R. Aminian

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @machinerylubrication. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“LUBRICA” (@machinerylubrication), 436 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/machinerylubrication.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.