Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Записки мирянина

Channel

Записки мирянина

@m_nevolin

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

162subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001515989134
TypeChannel
Username@m_nevolin
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/m_nevolin

Growth

162163162.58 August 2026 — 163 subscribers8 August 2026 — 163 subscribers16 August 2026 — 162 subscribers8 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 162–163 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 06:55162-1
8 Aug 2026, 16:32163no change
8 Aug 2026, 01:00163first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
46.7%
avg views ÷ 162 subscribers
Avg views / post
75.6
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.74%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held20 (25 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total1,512
Reactions total128
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3s
Average length
3s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

128 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4434.4%
3930.5%
🔥1410.9%
😁1310.2%
💯86.25%
🎉53.91%
😎21.56%
🤣21.56%
🤔10.781%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 128reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 05:47 UTC32 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

"Поклонение «в духе и истине» требует непрерывных духовных творческих усилий, в то время как гораздо легче идти по пути рутинного повторения одного и того же: «Отцы наши спасались так, и нам отступать от этого негоже». При этом сознание погружается в самодовольную уверенность, что сделал все, «что положено». Это естественное стремление тварного существа остановиться в замкнутом цикле, им же созданном. Однако стремлен

3👍2🤔1

7 Aug 2026, 06:22 UTC41 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

В одной из заповедей, прозвучавшей в так называемой Нагорной проповеди, Иисус призывает не судить других людей (Мф. 7:1-2). Это касается не только каких-то внешних проявлений, но и внутреннего состояния, которое другие могут и не замечать. Но всё-таки, как правило, так или иначе оно проявляется – осуждающие слова, уничижение, сплетня и т.д. Разумеется, христиане, знакомы и с текстом Нагорной проповеди, и с образным в

👍1

6 Aug 2026, 08:36 UTC47 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

В 3-й главе Екклесиаста говорится о времени молчать и времени говорить. Если задуматься и оглянуться назад, то каких случаев в вашей жизни было больше и о чем чаще сожалеете?

  1. Промолчал, когда надо было сказать14%
  2. Высказался, а потом сожалел, что не смог промолчать24%
  3. Примерно 50/50 - одинаково часто бывало и то, и другое62%
  4. Не припомню таких ситуаций - всегда молчу и говорю, когда надо0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Aug 2026, 08:21 UTC53 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Я знаю, как надо читать тексты Священного Писания. Знаю о важности понимания контекста. Осознаю, что не стоит выдёргивать один стих и делать на его основании какие-то выводы. Но иногда бывает, что какая-то вроде бы второстепенная фраза из повествования почему-то буквально врезается в память. Помню как-то много лет назад, читая 24-ю главу Бытия, мне особенно запомнился один стих. Глава посвящена истории о том, как Авр

5👍3

3 Aug 2026, 19:21 UTC64 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

«Есть у меня дурацкая привычка: работать при шумовом фоне — вечно радио включено или ТВ. Это я на кораблях от тишины отвык, тишина на нервы действует — в морях или главный двигатель молотит, или какая-нибудь динамка, или голоса за переборкой. Вот и не могу в тиши.» (В. Конецкий)

👍1

31 Jul 2026, 04:58 UTC101 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

"Человека делают счастливым три вещи: любовь, интересная работа и возможность путешествовать" (Иван Бунин)

💯8👍1

30 Jul 2026, 13:57 UTC91 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Подбираю шапку на осень

🔥5👍4🤣2

30 Jul 2026, 08:02 UTC86 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

👍3😁1

29 Jul 2026, 15:02 UTC83 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ноги сами привели к храму

7

29 Jul 2026, 07:09 UTC75 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

👍4

28 Jul 2026, 16:11 UTC77 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Привлекло название отеля. Заглянул, но выяснилось, что за получение номера всё-таки надо платить :)

😁10😎2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @m_nevolin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Aug 2026, 08:36 UTCAnonymous Poll21 voters

В 3-й главе Екклесиаста говорится о времени молчать и времени говорить. Если задуматься и оглянуться назад, то каких случаев в вашей жизни было больше и о чем чаще сожалеете?

  1. Промолчал, когда надо было сказать14%
  2. Высказался, а потом сожалел, что не смог промолчать24%
  3. Примерно 50/50 - одинаково часто бывало и то, и другое62%
  4. Не припомню таких ситуаций - всегда молчу и говорю, когда надо0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 786,246 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Записки мирянина” (@m_nevolin), 162 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/m_nevolin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.