Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for marya ✧︎

Channel

marya ✧︎

@m_mmarya

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

209subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 5 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002084789817
TypeChannel
Username@m_mmarya
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded5 September 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/m_mmarya

Growth

207210208.55 September 2026 — 207 subscribers5 September 2026 — 207 subscribers6 September 2026 — 210 subscribers15 September 2026 — 209 subscribers2095 September 202615 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 10 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 207–210 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 02:57209-1
6 Sept 2026, 21:57210+3
5 Sept 2026, 06:22207no change
5 Sept 2026, 05:47207first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
52.9%
avg views ÷ 209 subscribers
Avg views / post
111
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.99%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held15 (7 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total442
Reactions total4
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Sept 2026, 06:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

71 reactions across 10 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😢1115.5%
custom 54156480444838869391014.1%
💘1014.1%
912.7%
💋912.7%
😭79.86%
custom 541574394251367792245.63%
😁45.63%
❤‍🔥22.82%
👍22.82%
custom 541568591321053495611.41%
custom 542912079425072494711.41%
😱11.41%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 71 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 15 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @m_mmarya. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 19:21 UTC54 viewsread 5 September 2026

очень много событий и очень много хочется рассказать и показать но на данный момент я слишком морально загружена. поэтому как только приду в себя, сразу всё выложу !!

28 Aug 2026, 16:51 UTC126 viewsread 5 September 2026

почему проблемы фундаментально никогда никуда не деваются

27 Aug 2026, 16:19 UTC134 views4 reactionsread 5 September 2026

эпик фэил номер 2: в тесте поставила все ответы наугад, но поступила в лингвистический…

😁4

27 Aug 2026, 15:41 UTC128 viewsread 5 September 2026

в мире есть только два лучших места: моя комната и Переславль-Залесский

22 Aug 2026, 20:28 UTC154 views6 reactionsread 5 September 2026

я наверное за всю свою жизнь не ела столько сладкого как сегодня

custom 54157439425136779224custom 54156480444838869391custom 54156859132105349561

22 Aug 2026, 16:13 UTC135 views5 reactionsread 5 September 2026
Photo

сегодня весь день ужасное настроение, а к вечеру еще и дождь пошел.. • из плохих новостей: не поступила в лингвистический класс 💔 • из хороших: я снова в Переславлеее!! 🥹🌆

😭5

21 Aug 2026, 20:51 UTC122 viewsread 5 September 2026

я сегодня ахереваю от жизни вновь и вновь

21 Aug 2026, 19:29 UTC118 views14 reactionsread 5 September 2026
Photo

прощай Вектор 😭💚 обо всём позже 💔

😢11😭2😱1

18 Aug 2026, 22:25 UTC128 views13 reactionsread 5 September 2026
Photo

пару дней назад побывали в супер вайбовом месте с видом на весь город 🏙️✨ люблю Переславль и тебя, Ксюнь 🫶🏻🤍

💋6💘4custom 54156480444838869392❤‍🔥1

18 Aug 2026, 21:27 UTC109 views9 reactions1 Starread 5 September 2026
Photo

сегодня сидели на набережной и кушали додо 🤍 вайб имеется

💘6💋2custom 54291207942507249471

10 Aug 2026, 16:33 UTC164 views9 reactionsread 5 September 2026

итоги учебного года 🥺 ❤️‍🩹 некоторые события в моей жизни подтолкнули меня всё-таки написать итоги учебного года, так вот… …если кратко: ну вайбовый учебный год! не самый лучший, но один из!! много интересного: школа мюзикла, много мероприятий, репетиций, не сильно сложная учеба, ну круто же! я много делала подарков, заморачивалась над открытками учителям и педагогам, делала классные подарки друзьям , вобщем, это т

7❤‍🔥1💋1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @m_mmarya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ЛОКТЕВА ЕЛИЗАВЕТА
@LizochkaEl · 32,267
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 5 September 2026
Merenkov family
@merenkov_family · 23,658
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 18 September 2026
СОЛНЦЕ
@suntvru · 25,421
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 14 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“marya ✧︎” (@m_mmarya), 209 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/m_mmarya.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.