Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

[РЕСТ] ʰᵒᵐᵉ˚₊ 𝖬✶𝖫𝖠𝖭𝖢𝖧𝖮𝖫𝖸

@m1holylf

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

25subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002052324199
TypeChannel
Username@m1holylf
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/m1holylf

Growth

2511 Aug 2026, 15:16 — 25 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 19:11 — 25 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 15:1611 Aug 2026, 19:11
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24–26 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 19:1125no change
11 Aug 2026, 15:1625first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 18 August 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

6 reactions across 1 post, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5312458358526058606350.0%
custom 5228715391131341640233.3%
custom 5213399271465832634116.7%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 August 2024 to 31 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Aug 2024, 18:16 UTC446 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

☆ ︶┄ ⏝┄︶ ✧ ✨ ✧ ︶┄⏝ ︶ ☆ 、、 ❤️“𝑮𝑨𝑴𝑬”❤️ 、、 💫──Чья ϶ᴛᴏ чᴀᴄᴛь?──✨☆ ИТОГИ! На самом последнем месте у нас уместился Цзяоцю со счётом 0,5 балла! Благодарю тебя за участие (хоть и не долгое)❤ А мы переходим к нашему топу 3! На третем месте у нас оказался Бутхилл! Его счёт: 2 балла.❤ Второе место с отрывом в 6,5 баллов занимает Келус со счётом 8,5 баллов! Ты показал хороший результат, друг!😚 И ПЕРВОЕ МЕСТО у

custom 53124583585260586063custom 52287153911313416402custom 52133992714658326341

18 Aug 2024, 17:56 UTC325 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

☆ ︶┄ ⏝┄︶ ✧ ✨ ✧ ︶┄⏝ ︶ ☆ 、、 ❤️“𝑮𝑨𝑴𝑬”❤️ 、、 💫──Чья ϶ᴛᴏ чᴀᴄᴛь?──✨☆ А вот и финал! Ждём ваши ответы в комментариях! Отгадавший: @antaine2003 +1 балл! А наша замечательная ведущая удаляется на пару минут для подсчёта баллов…

18 Aug 2024, 17:52 UTC238 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

☆ ︶┄ ⏝┄︶ ✧ ✨ ✧ ︶┄⏝ ︶ ☆ 、、 ❤️“𝑮𝑨𝑴𝑬”❤️ 、、 💫──Чья ϶ᴛᴏ чᴀᴄᴛь?──✨☆ — А это не слишком? — Так в этом же весь азарт игры! В игре появились небольшие нарушения! В игре всё правильно! За комплимент ведущей будет +0,5 баллов;) Ждём ваши ответы в комментариях! Отгадавший: @ozerovodi +1 балл! Один игрок слишком любил льстить… За приятные слова для меня @antaine2003 не получает дополнительные баллы! Но мы всё ра

18 Aug 2024, 17:49 UTC167 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

☆ ︶┄ ⏝┄︶ ✧ ✨ ✧ ︶┄⏝ ︶ ☆ 、、 ❤️“𝑮𝑨𝑴𝑬”❤️ 、、 💫──Чья ϶ᴛᴏ чᴀᴄᴛь?──✨☆ Ждём ваши ответы в комментариях! Отгадавший: @antaine2003 +1 балл!

18 Aug 2024, 17:44 UTC138 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

☆ ︶┄ ⏝┄︶ ✧ ✨ ✧ ︶┄⏝ ︶ ☆ 、、 ❤️“𝑮𝑨𝑴𝑬”❤️ 、、 💫──Чья ϶ᴛᴏ чᴀᴄᴛь?──✨☆ Ждём ваши ответы в комментариях! Отгадавший: @ozerovodi +1 балл!

18 Aug 2024, 17:40 UTC121 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

☆ ︶┄ ⏝┄︶ ✧ ✨ ✧ ︶┄⏝ ︶ ☆ 、、 ❤️“𝑮𝑨𝑴𝑬”❤️ 、、 💫──Чья ϶ᴛᴏ чᴀᴄᴛь?──✨☆ Ждём ваши ответы в комментариях! Отгадавший: @antaine2003 +1 балл!

18 Aug 2024, 17:38 UTC119 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

☆ ︶┄ ⏝┄︶ ✧ ✨ ✧ ︶┄⏝ ︶ ☆ 、、 ❤️“𝑮𝑨𝑴𝑬”❤️ 、、 💫──Чья ϶ᴛᴏ чᴀᴄᴛь?──✨☆ Ждём ваши ответы в комментариях! Отгадавший: @antaine2003 +1 балл!

18 Aug 2024, 17:32 UTC117 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

☆ ︶┄ ⏝┄︶ ✧ ✨ ✧ ︶┄⏝ ︶ ☆ 、、 ❤️“𝑮𝑨𝑴𝑬”❤️ 、、 💫──Чья ϶ᴛᴏ чᴀᴄᴛь?──✨☆ — Это издёвка? Ты серьёзно? — Это листик… В игре появились небольшие нарушения! Ждём ваши ответы в комментариях! Отгадавший: @ozerovodi +1 балл! Утешительные +0,5 баллов получают @skara_linda и @antaine2003 за то, что назвали половинки его полного названия

18 Aug 2024, 17:29 UTC98 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

☆ ︶┄ ⏝┄︶ ✧ ✨ ✧ ︶┄⏝ ︶ ☆ 、、 ❤️“𝑮𝑨𝑴𝑬”❤️ 、、 💫──Чья ϶ᴛᴏ чᴀᴄᴛь?──✨☆ Ждём ваши ответы в комментариях! Отгадавший: @antaine2003 + 1 балл!

18 Aug 2024, 17:27 UTC92 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

☆ ︶┄ ⏝┄︶ ✧ ✨ ✧ ︶┄⏝ ︶ ☆ 、、 ❤️“𝑮𝑨𝑴𝑬”❤️ 、、 💫──Чья ϶ᴛᴏ чᴀᴄᴛь?──✨☆ Ждём ваши ответы в комментариях! Отгадавший: @ozerovodi +1 балл!

18 Aug 2024, 17:24 UTC87 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

☆ ︶┄ ⏝┄︶ ✧ ✨ ✧ ︶┄⏝ ︶ ☆ 、、 ❤️“𝑮𝑨𝑴𝑬”❤️ 、、 💫──Чья ϶ᴛᴏ чᴀᴄᴛь?──✨☆ Первая десятки персонажей позади! Осталось ещё 10 и наконец-то Яоши пойдёт нормально поест. Ждём ваши ответы в комментариях! Отгадавший: @ozerovodi +1 балл! Видимо кому-то ОЧЕНЬ нужен приз…

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @m1holylf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,001,446 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“[РЕСТ] ʰᵒᵐᵉ˚₊ 𝖬✶𝖫𝖠𝖭𝖢𝖧𝖮𝖫𝖸” (@m1holylf), 25 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/m1holylf.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.