Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ˊ ᥣᥡrᥲ ỉᥒ𝖿᥆ . 𓏵

@lyrainfoo

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

23subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002408693710
TypeChannel
Username@lyrainfoo
Descriptionага
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 1 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/lyrainfoo

Growth

2311 Aug 2026, 16:17 — 23 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 16:30 — 23 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 16:1711 Aug 2026, 16:30
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22–24 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 16:3023no change
11 Aug 2026, 16:1723first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 March 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
223.1%
avg views ÷ 23 subscribers
Avg views / post
51.3
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
50.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held20 (1 March 20253 August 2026)
Views total975
Reactions total240
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
9
Links
5

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

410 reactions across 10 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52219380358174830666716.3%
custom 54430403537603566326515.9%
custom 52694231512923864676215.1%
custom 54431264893294782234611.2%
🤓4511.0%
🍓225.37%
215.12%
💘204.88%
😡174.15%
🍌153.66%
custom 5368318303745882763112.68%
🕊61.46%
🍾51.22%
👻40.976%
💋40.976%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 410reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 March 2025 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 23:33 UTC55 views27 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @tupaiusPhoto

⸝⸝ ТУПА Я — ГВЕН ( #totaldrama )

custom 52219380358174830669custom 54430403537603566328custom 52694231512923864677custom 54431264893294782233

3 Aug 2026, 23:18 UTC65 views30 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Poll

🐾🦢 🎀𝒚𝒓𝒂 𝒊𝒔 . . . ⁉️ 🖤🖤🖤

  1. 𝗶𝗻𝗻𝗼𝗰𝗲𝗻𝘁 🤩82%
  2. 𝗴𝘂𝗶𝗹𝘁𝘆🖤18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

custom 526942315129238646710custom 52219380358174830669custom 54430403537603566328custom 54431264893294782233

3 Aug 2026, 23:18 UTC54 views32 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🤩 🗒🎀ᴏᴠᴇ ➖𝓛ɪsᴛ❗🥹 🫶 🍰🍰🍰 🖤(𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑑𝑜𝑒𝑠𝑛'𝑡 𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑒𝑟 !! ) ──────── 𝟬𝟭. @ᥴⲉⲏⲇⲃυɥ , 𝟬𝟮. @ⲃ᥈ᥲⲇя 𝟬𝟯. @ᥲɥ𐔖ⲃᥴⲙыᥴ᥈ᥱ , 𝟬𝟰. @ⲕᥴюⲙυⲕ𐔤 , 𝟬𝟱. @ⲕρⲕρ , 𝟬𝟲. @ρ𐔖ⲙᥲ , 𝟬𝟳. @ᥴᥱρᥲⲫυⲙ , 𝟬𝟴. @ⲧᥲⳝ𐔤ρᥱⲧⲕᥲ , 𝟬𝟵. @ᥴⲕᥲύ , 𝟭𝟬. @ᥴᥲяⲕᥲ , 𝟭𝟭. @ᥲ᥈υⲏⲕᥲ , 𝟭𝟮. @ρυⲏᥲ , 𝟭𝟯. @ⲙᥲⲏⲇᥲρυⲏ , 𝟭𝟰. @ⲕᥱⲕ , 𝟭𝟱. @ⲃυ᥈υⲕᥴ , 𝟭𝟲. @᥈υ᥈υ , 𝟭𝟳. @ᥒ𐔖᥈яя , 𝟭𝟴. @ᥲ᥈юⲙυⲏυύ , 𝟭𝟵. @ⲇⲿ𐔤ⲏ𐔖 𝟮𝟬. @ⳝ𐔖ⲧᥲⲏⳝ𐔖ⲧ 🖤🖤 𝑣𝑙𝑎𝑑𝑦𝑎, 𝑣𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑥, 𝑙𝑖𝑙𝑦, 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑦𝑎 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑚𝑦 𝑖𝑟𝑙 𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑏𝑟𝑜𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟, 𝑜𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟 𝑚𝑦 𝑜𝑛𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑒 /

custom 522193803581748306612custom 52694231512923864678custom 54430403537603566328custom 54431264893294782234

3 Aug 2026, 23:18 UTC54 views30 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🥹✉️inn list 🤩 🖤🖤 🕷 (gwen, lute, lapis, Ivan&sua, princess luna, stan marsh, marceline — higher kinns) , 🖤 🍰🍰🍰🍰🍰 🤩🤩𝘩𝘢𝘵'𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 all . . 🎀

custom 544304035376035663210custom 52219380358174830669custom 52694231512923864679custom 54431264893294782232

3 Aug 2026, 23:17 UTC50 views29 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🎀 ’ ☺️вен нашла своего главного бестфана !😻 😻. — ‹. td_you.t.me 😻 :: выигрывает @LIRAAA, набрав 5 голосов !!😻💞

custom 544304035376035663210custom 54431264893294782239custom 52219380358174830668custom 52694231512923864672

3 Aug 2026, 23:17 UTC48 views23 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🎀🎀🤩epost if... 💕 🕷 :: — если вы любите Гвен^_^ 😻 !! td_you.t.me :: #repostif

custom 54430403537603566328custom 54431264893294782237custom 52694231512923864676custom 52219380358174830662

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lyrainfoo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Aug 2026, 23:18 UTCAnonymous Poll17 voters

🐾🦢 🎀𝒚𝒓𝒂 𝒊𝒔 . . . ⁉️ 🖤🖤🖤

  1. 𝗶𝗻𝗻𝗼𝗰𝗲𝗻𝘁 🤩82%
  2. 𝗴𝘂𝗶𝗹𝘁𝘆🖤18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 March 2025 to 3 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,305,326 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ˊ ᥣᥡrᥲ ỉᥒ𝖿᥆ . 𓏵” (@lyrainfoo), 23 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lyrainfoo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.