Channel
@lyney_veil
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
10subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003460469534 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lyney_veil |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 21 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lyney_veil |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:57 | 10 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:46 | 10 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 21 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
64 reactions across 5 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 22 | 34.4% | |
| 💯 | 15 | 23.4% | |
| ❤ | 11 | 17.2% | |
| 🎉 | 9 | 14.1% | |
| 💋 | 4 | 6.25% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 4.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 64reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 21 November 2025 to 30 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⬛:: морозного утра, кружок юных иллюзионистов! фух, я скажу честно — я в своём Фонтейне малость зажрался и стал тропической птахой, уж совершенно забыл, что такое снежневские студни. как и хотел, сходил сегодня на Рождественскую ярмарку в центре города… и неожиданно встретил там одного из Предвестников. мне предложили сыграть в тир на игрушку — ну а я то что? не отказываться же в лицо Одиннадцатому, верно?) постреля…
❤🔥5🎉5💯5❤1
⬛:: спите? а лучше бы спали. ладно-ладно, я тихонечко побубню тут о делах насущных… тащемта я наконец разобрался с чемоданами и выкроил время на поездку в Дом Очага. развлёк сегодня Очаговских малышей парочкой фокусов. всё-таки знаете, дети — самые верные и искренние зрители. мне доводилось выступать перед бесчисленным количеством взрослых, но ни одни аплодисменты для меня не значат столь же много, сколько отдача от…
❤🔥4🎉4💋4❤1
⬛:: ах, как было хорошо быть мелким шкетом в Доме Очага, когда ещё не приходилось платить со своих кровных за аренду жилья! но увы, я могу оборачивать время вспять только на сцене, в реальности же таким навыком, увы, не обладаю. но цены на аренду в Снежной… оплату картами принимаете? у меня только игральные, правда- заселился в близлежащих апартаментах, благо старые связи помогли найти хорошую локацию неподалёку от …
❤🔥4💯3🔥3
⬛:: небольшое обновление! я добавил публичную почту, так что теперь смогу общаться с вами и в live формате
❤🔥5❤4💯3
⬛:: добрый-добрый вечер всем читателям этого блога, и добро пожаловать за кулисы большой сцены. я очень рад наконец завести блог — стоило это сделать долгое время назад, на самом деле, ахахах. в любом случае, безумно рад видеть здесь всех и каждого. что же касается новостей, то я решил заглянуть на родину в Снежную — давече закончили серию выступлений в Фонтейне, о чём я вам непременно поведаю, как только разгребу ч…
❤5❤🔥4💯4
🤩🤩🤩 🔤 𝐑𝐂𝐇𝐈𝐕𝐄 🤩🤩🤩 здесь ведётся учёт прошлых выступлений, фотографии воспоминаний и хранится памятный реквизит. ⬛ ⬛ ⬛ ⬛
𝕳𝐎𝐔𝐒𝐄 𝐎𝐅 𝕮𝐀𝐑𝐃𝐒 || 𝕷𝐘𝐍𝐄𝐘 pinned a photo
🤩🤩🤩 🎀𝐀𝐕𝐈𝐆𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 🤩🤩🤩 добро пожаловать, дорогие зрители! хватайте игристое, попкорн, занимайте свои места — шоу вот-вот начнется. и мой вам совет: не стоит слепо верить своим глазам, они имеют склонность подводить. :) ⬛😀😀 ⭐⭐⭐⭐ 😀😀⬛ 🎀𝐇𝐎 𝐀𝐌 𝐈? хо-хо, вам выпала уникальная возможность поглазеть на закулисье одного из самых известных иллюзионистов Фонтейна, я даже завидую! ладно-ладно. имя мне Лини — выходец из Дома Очаг…
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @lyney_veil. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 270,391 of 1,628,524entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@lyney_veil named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝕳𝐎𝐔𝐒𝐄 𝐎𝐅 𝕮𝐀𝐑𝐃𝐒 || 𝕷𝐘𝐍𝐄𝐘” (@lyney_veil), 10 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lyney_veil.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.