Channel
@lxstry
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
423subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001780987239 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lxstry |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lxstry |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 16:48 | 423 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:30 | 424 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:00 | 424 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (8 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,516 |
| Reactions total | 317 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 19:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
342 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5366309693570428364 | 185 | 54.1% | |
| custom 5368421975666483657 | 61 | 17.8% | |
| custom 5251705371814287405 | 60 | 17.5% | |
| custom 5368598816649928848 | 36 | 10.5% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 342reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Сегодня мне исполнилось 24 годика, это столько же, сколько Джею…никогда не думала что стану ровесницей своего перса 😳 Вообщем буду рада репостикам, а ещё хочу напомнить что бью татули 🤩✨
custom 536630969357042836410custom 52517053718142874053custom 53685988166499288482
Всем доброго вечера! У меня еще возник вопросик, но уже не по вчерашнему посту Я тут много чем занимаюсь (типа работаю постоянно…) и хочу посоветоваться с вами хд Мне интересно, какие платформы соцсетки сейчас более популярны по теме, касательно продвижения всяких хэндмэйд штук (домашняя кондитерка, например), стоит ли заводить тг канал вообще для разных видов творчества и тд Я знаю что инста вроде как всегда паха…
custom 536842197566648365719custom 52517053718142874056custom 53685988166499288483
Несколько худов забанили меня в тви за то что я нарисовала Клову О БОЖЕ с феминным телосложением (я запостила картинку, которую рисовала для зина. и плевать, что райот геймс ОФИЦИАЛЬНО РАЗРЕШИЛИ в странах снг обращение к этому персонажу - она и называть в женском роде, так как они в курсе наших с вами законов и уважают интересы разных пользователей) В комментариях открылся портал в ад, меня назвали тфобкой и пр, ка…
custom 536630969357042836445custom 525170537181428740514custom 536859881664992884810custom 53684219756664836571
Сегодня мой День Рождения⭐⭐ ✨✨✨✨✨✨ 🍰 И это самый хороший повод поблагодарить вас за то, что продолжаете смотреть и поддерживать моё творчество!!! Я безумно сильно это ценю и готова снова и снова брать карандаш в руки!!!! 🥹!🎀 🎀Буду очень рада репостам и приятностям в комментариях 🎀 Спасибо вам всем большое!!! <3
custom 536630969357042836415custom 52517053718142874053custom 53684219756664836573custom 53685988166499288482
Емое… я, конечно, понимаю, что традишка у меня не самая ахуенная, но почему постоянно отписки то((( хотела отфоткать покрасивше, но теперь вообще не хочется 😔
custom 536630969357042836424custom 52517053718142874056custom 53685988166499288485custom 53684219756664836571
Хочу немного оформление поменять (мне оно никогда не давалось, но тем не менее) Если кто захочет - можете кинуть голоса на канал 🐾 https://t.me/boost/lxstry https://t.me/boost/lxstry https://t.me/boost/lxstry p.s. новая кнопка для привлечения внимания, ее зовут Кася 👅
custom 536630969357042836431custom 53684219756664836579custom 53685988166499288486custom 52517053718142874055
🤩Я почти вернулась домой)) Без интернета и норм связи рисовала традишку… На неделе сажусь за долги, как только доеду до дома! 🤩🤩🤩Чота меня 🤩🤩🤩потянуло на 🤩 своих славян…
custom 536630969357042836460custom 525170537181428740523custom 53685988166499288488custom 53684219756664836573
Первая атака для @lxstry Картинка в хорошем качестве в комментариях ^^
custom 536842197566648365725
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @lxstry. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 69,381 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Люстра✨” (@lxstry), 423 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lxstry.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.