2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 180–182 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 12:47
181
no change
8 Aug 2026, 07:16
181
first reading
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 24 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
10
Videos
4
Links
6
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1m 48s
Average length
27s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
139 reactions across 10 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
84
60.4%
👍
42
30.2%
⚡
4
2.88%
✍
2
1.44%
❤🔥
2
1.44%
😱
2
1.44%
🆒
1
0.719%
👏
1
0.719%
🤝
1
0.719%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 139reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 24 April 2025 to 28 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
WBCE 2026: автоматизация шагнула вперёд
📍Вот и прошли два насыщенных дня — 23 и 24 апреля в отеле «Виноградово» в Москве состоялась юбилейная, пятая по счёту конференция и выставка WBCE 2026, посвящённая "умному дому" и промышленной автоматизации.
💡СКАУТ принимает участие уже во второй раз в этой выставке и каждый раз собирает большое число в целевых запросов, а также живой интерес посетителей. Кроме того, мы разви…
📣Уважаемые партнёры!
Приглашаем вас на WBCE 2026
Мы участвуем в ежегодной конференции и выставке по автоматизации — WBCE 2026, которая пройдёт 23–24 апреля в Москве.
Мероприятие будет интересно всем, кто проектирует и внедряет автоматизацию зданий и инженерных систем.
💡На нашем стенде расскажем и покажем оборудование и ПО СКАУТ серии Luxnet, предназначенное для автоматизации бизнес-процессов.
🚍 Вы также сможете …
Уважаемые партнёры!
✔️В эту пятницу 10 октября в 10:00 МСК приглашаем вас принять участие в вебинаре, посвящённом возможностям систем мониторинга складской техники и персонала без использования GPS.
В программе вебинара:
🔸Мониторинг складской техники:
• Решение по контролю техники без GPS.
• Видеоконтроль, управление доступом и контроль скоростных ограничений как на складе, так и за его пределами.
• Выявление недо…
Автоматическая система управления наружным освещением на железнодорожных путях. Свет переключается из дежурного режима (20% яркости) в рабочий режим работы (100% яркости) только при наличии обслуживающего вагоны персонала, детекция присутствия человека осуществляется камерами с видеоаналитикой при помощи нейросети.
Для управления светильниками используются контроллеры Luxnet в NEMA корпусе.
Проект реализован нашим па…
А вот и результат работы Luxnet на складе Заказчика
Итог:
- Экономия до 90% электроэнергии даже во время присутствия персонала
- Работа с несколькими метками одновременно
- Управление в сложных условиях переотражения сигнала от полностью металлических стен, крыши и балок
Продуктивно выступили на WBCE 2025 https://wbce.wirenboard.com, кроме беспроводного управления большой интерес вызвала геолокация и все что связано с беспроводными метками.
Интеграция с Rightech позволила реализовать сложные сценарии взаимодействия пользователей включая удаленный доступ https://rightech.io/ru
В этом году участие приняли 42 компании, полный текст статьи https://habr.com/ru/companies/wirenboard/artic…
Что такое Luxnet? Это наше российское решение для удаленного управления оборудованием и геолокации в помещении. Там где раньше были провода теперь работает беспроводка. Разработано нашими инженерами из Санкт-Петербурга.
Контрастные отличия и важные детали:
- Все данные передаются по меш-сети
- Все устройства выступают в качестве узлов сети
- Максимальное внедрение на данный момент 2000 устройств в сети в условиях пр…
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @luxnet_pro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 91,710 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Declared links
One URL this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association— we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Luxnet” (@luxnet_pro), 181 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/luxnet_pro.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
