Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 情书先生的fake account

Channel

情书先生的fake account

@luvletterviews

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

409subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001499370511
TypeChannel
Username@luvletterviews
CreatedBetween 1 July 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/luvletterviews

Growth

409410409.57 August 2026 — 410 subscribers8 August 2026 — 410 subscribers16 August 2026 — 409 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 409–410 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 04:12409-1
8 Aug 2026, 05:35410no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:20410first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 7 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

385 reactions across 19 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣12532.5%
🤡9223.9%
😭4411.4%
😁348.83%
🤮277.01%
👎205.19%
🍾184.68%
🍓123.12%
👍51.30%
💩51.30%
10.26%
👏10.26%
💯10.26%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 385reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 7 April 2025 to 15 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Jul 2025, 10:19 UTC≈2,110 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @SUPERNANDPhoto

luv这个傻逼的智商还不足以支撑它使用U2 SSD

🤣19🤡4

21 May 2025, 02:44 UTC≈1,740 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

还是看看远方的大拇指按到左上角吧家人们

🤣10👎2

21 May 2025, 02:44 UTC≈1,590 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Luv老师这也太幽默了,且不谈 OriginOS 和 小米澎湃OS 都可以切换瀑布流和平铺样式 单是这个“因为你做得和苹果不一样所以你不好”的逻辑就让人忍俊不禁。。。🤣🤣🤣 source

🤣16👎3

19 May 2025, 11:09 UTC≈1,140 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

请看情书老师针对玄戒O1发表观点。 我觉得确实有一种可能,目前都是小米放的假情报,实际是3nm+8E级别性能,其它的嘛,这毕竟是情书老师,权且当乐子看吧 source

😁10👎1

2 May 2025, 11:46 UTC≈1,070 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

圣地巡礼,撸老师的心灵控制起作用了😭

🤡15🤣3💩2😭1

28 Apr 2025, 16:25 UTC997 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @SUPERNANDPhoto

你这种脑子不好使,自媒体混成这个鸟样,Apple都看不上的蠢猪 的确玩不来Dell EMC #存储笑话 #畜生合集

🤣17😭3👍1👎1

28 Apr 2025, 16:25 UTC867 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @SUPERNANDPhoto

luv,你妈是不是死了? 企业级用户不用Dell EMC和HPE、Lenovo、IBM、Net APP等厂商的存储集群,不做321方案,用你妈的傻卵单机nas,你全家骨灰盒都需要存在一块傻卵HDD上是吧? 群晖在SNIA、FMS说得上话吗?路边一条还叫唤上了? 我严重怀疑luv对企业的认知就是他们这群傻卵自媒体。你爹Apple都要买Dell的服务器,听懂了吗,畜生? #存储笑话 #畜生合集

🤡21👎1

17 Apr 2025, 22:48 UTC905 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

LuvLetter的动态 @LuvLetter: 再说个的观察, 就是看到看两天不少串子用爱猫tv梗来攻击, 甚至这两天看玩机器也在玩哈基米应激梗. 这些梗说实话挺low的, 因为猫作为动物, 确实是有兽性, 因此不同品种的智商和亲人程度有所不同. 但把所有的猫都打成容易应激的低能生物属实有点让人难绷. 就从最基本的点来说, 你对猫好, 给他投喂, 不去强迫它做它不喜欢的事情, 那它自然也亲近你; 如果强迫去做它不喜欢的事情, 特别是在没有熟悉建立信任的情况下, 那确实就会攻击甚至是应激. 而这点对人来说也一样, 特别是建立亲密关系, incel 和 troll 可以说是高度相关的, 或者说在家里开串基本都是出生. 所以很简单, 碰到这样没有边界感的人拉黑就得了, 串子到处乱串, 最终的受害者只会是自己. 这些人在精神上宣布胜利的时候已经是身处下水道.

🤡9👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @luvletterviews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“情书先生的fake account” (@luvletterviews), 409 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/luvletterviews.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.