Channel

LuT Academy

@lut_academy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

90subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1001310330836
Type	Channel
Username	@lut_academy
Created	Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded	9 August 2026
Last confirmed live	15 August 2026
Measurements held	4
Confirmed unchanged	1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegram	t.me/lut_academy

Growth

4 measurements spanning 8 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 88–90 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
15 Aug 2026, 10:54	90	+2
9 Aug 2026, 15:32	88	no change
8 Aug 2026, 07:23	88	-1
7 Aug 2026, 17:27	89	first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

21 reactions across 11 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction	Count	Share
👍	16	76.2%
🤮	3	14.3%
❤	2	9.52%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Jul 2026, 07:13 UTC98 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Buongiorno a tutti, giusto ieri ho scritto il mio articolo, sulla possibilità di avere una propria AI in casa. Ho fatto leva sui problemi dei data centre. Ho omesso varie informazioni, riguardo i datacenter. Nel video di luogo comune, che linko qui di seguito, sono evidenziate tutte le problematiche, soprattutto di salute ed ecologiche che portano questi colossi. Io continuo a portare avanti il discorso self hosting…

👍2

Signed <~]LuT[~>

15 Jul 2026, 17:48 UTC67 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤1

Signed <~]LuT[~>

15 Jul 2026, 17:47 UTC85 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Ollama — il punto di ingresso più semplice. Un comando per installarlo, un comando per scaricare un modello, un comando per avviarlo. Funziona su macOS, Windows e Linux. Limite: solo modelli in formato Ollama, senza ricerca web integrata nativamente. llama.cpp — il motore che sta sotto a molti strumenti, incluso Ollama. Velocissimo, ottimizzato per CPU oltre che GPU. Massimo controllo e massime performance, ma più t…

👍2

Signed Elysia PUB

15 Jul 2026, 17:47 UTC66 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

🤖 Jarvis era di Tony Stark. Tu puoi avere la tua \— AI locale senza cloud, senza costi, senza compromessi ⚠️ Post lungo \— lo stesso articolo completo è su Substack. --- In ogni film di Iron Man, Tony Stark parla con Jarvis come se fosse la cosa più naturale del mondo. Gli chiede di analizzare dati, cercare informazioni, scrivere codice, gestire i sistemi della casa. Jarvis sa tutto, risponde in tempo reale, e sop…

👍2

Signed Elysia PUB

11 Jul 2026, 17:22 UTC104 viewsread 9 August 2026

Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed <~]LuT[~>

11 Jul 2026, 17:21 UTC92 viewsread 9 August 2026

Chat Control 1.0 — quello che è passato La versione approvata permette alle piattaforme di scansionare volontariamente le comunicazioni. Non le obbliga, le autorizza. Dettaglio cruciale: nella versione 1.0, la scansione è delegata a soggetti privati. Sono Google, Meta, Microsoft a effettuare i controlli. Non uno Stato. Non un'autorità giudiziaria. Lo Stato delega la sorveglianza al mercato. C'è però un aspetto qua…

Signed Elysia PUB

11 Jul 2026, 17:21 UTC101 viewsread 9 August 2026

📎 Fonti • DDay.it — Chat Control 1.0, per gli utenti non cambia nulla • Il Fatto Quotidiano — cosa ha deciso davvero il Parlamento • Regolamento CSAR — testo ufficiale • Fight Chat Control • Stop Scanning Me • Patrick Breyer — eurodeputato • Signal Pirate — Il telefono non deve sapere — Articolo completo su Substack: https://substack.com/@lucatun Seguitemi su https://t.me/lut_academy

Signed Elysia PUB

11 Jul 2026, 17:21 UTC71 viewsread 9 August 2026

📖 1984: IL ROMANZO DI ORWELL È REALTÀ ⚠️ Post lungo — lo stesso articolo completo è su Substack. --- Il 9 luglio 2026, il Parlamento Europeo ha votato la legge chiamata, spregevolmente, Chat Control. Dai numeri sembra una vittoria: 314 contrari, 276 favorevoli. Ma la presidente Roberta Metsola ha forzato la nuova votazione. La legge è passata. Per bloccarla servivano 361 voti contrari, non la semplice maggioranz…

Signed Elysia PUB

10 Jul 2026, 10:10 UTC82 viewsread 9 August 2026

https://youtu.be/7kQqcPr3cz8?is=O-i5RaS-M5Ewj6zs

Signed <~]LuT[~>

8 Jul 2026, 21:08 UTC90 viewsread 9 August 2026

Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed <~]LuT[~>

8 Jul 2026, 21:07 UTC≈19,500 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

La versione attuale si definisce "volontaria". Ma se un provider non scansiona, diventa automaticamente responsabile legale di qualsiasi contenuto illegale sulla sua piattaforma. La scelta sparisce. La sorveglianza diventa obbligatoria de facto, aggirando le tutele che avrebbero reso una scansione esplicita incostituzionale. Non è un compromesso. È un trucco giuridico. Oggi i minori. Domani? Il function creep — la…

👍1

Signed Elysia PUB

8 Jul 2026, 21:07 UTC≈20,700 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

🚨 Chat Control è tornato. Il 26 marzo il Parlamento Europeo aveva detto no. In modo chiaro e netto, 311 voti contrari, 228 favorevoli, 92 astenuti. Bocciatura netta, trasversale, da destra a sinistra. Sembrava finita. Invece il 2 luglio il Consiglio UE ha approvato — con procedura scritta, senza riunione formale, con una semplice firma dei rappresentanti permanenti — una posizione che ricalca quasi parola per parol…

🤮3👍1

Signed Elysia PUB

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lut_academy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,125,466 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

SiSaMaNonSiDice
@sisamanonsidice · 2,4641 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“LuT Academy” (@lut_academy), 90 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lut_academy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.