Channel
@lustassion
On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
42subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003821113644 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lustassion |
| Created | 28 May 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lustassion |
@lustassion was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 20:22 | 42 | no change |
| 27 Sept 2026, 19:48 | 42 | +5 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 15:56 | 37 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 36 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 02:53 | 37 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:01 | 40 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:02 | 40 | first reading |
34 posts held, back to 28 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 34 (28 May 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 2,743 |
| Reactions total | 29 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 20:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
69 reactions across 31 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🕊 | 40 | 58.0% | |
| ❤ | 28 | 40.6% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 1.45% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 69 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩𝟐𝟔.𝟎𝟗.𝟐𝟔. 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 𑀝ᥱᴦ᧐дня ᤋᥲκ᧘ючᥲᥱᴛᥴя ᥴ᧐юᤋ ⲙᥱжду ɸ᧘удᥲⲙᥙ @shadowsofthesea ᥙ @lustassion 𐌑y ɗᥲys ᥱᥒɗ δᥱsᴛ ᥕɦᥱᥒ ᴛɦᥱ sᥙᥒsᥱᴛ gᥱᴛs iᴛsᥱᥣf δᥱɦiᥒɗ. Tɦᥲᴛ ᥣiᴛᴛᥣᥱ ᥣᥲɗy siᴛᴛiᥒg ᧐ᥒ ᴛɦᥱ ρᥲssᥱᥒgᥱr siɗᥱ.
❤3
🌟🌟🌟🤩🤩🤩🤩🌟🌟🌟 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Писать 🤩@ve_taa_a
❤2
🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩᧐ᴛ 𐌑ᥙⲙᥙ. 🌟Ждёⲙ κᥲжд᧐ᴦ᧐ ᥙᤋ-ᤋᥲ ʙᥲᥴ! #ʙᥙдᥱ᧐
❤1
🌟🌟🤩🤩🤩🤩🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩 ♰: – Лэйн ищет своего Каина 🌟Очень много свободных ролей! 🌟Писать @ve_taa_a или @katerinasans
❤2
🌟🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 Ｌｕｓｔａｓｓｉｏｎ
❤2
🌟🌟🤩🤩🤩🤩🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 ˖⁺ 💧⋆ ୭ 🎀.⋆｡⋆༶⋆˙⊹: - 𐌲ᥲρдᥱρ᧐δ. Учᥲᥴᴛнᥙκᥙ ᥰᥙɯуᴛ ʙᥱдущᥱⲙу ᴦᴦ, κ᧐ᴛ᧐ρы᥊ ᧐нᥙ δудуᴛ ᧐дᥱʙᥲᴛь, ʙᥱдущᥙᥔ ᥴκᥙдыʙᥲᥱᴛ цʙᥱᴛ, ᥰ᧐ κ᧐ᴛ᧐ρ᧐ⲙу учᥲᥴᴛнᥙκᥙ д᧐᧘жны ᧐дᥱᴛь ᥴʙ᧐ю ᴦᴦ, ᥰ᧐ᥴ᧘ᥱ ϶ᴛ᧐ᴦ᧐ ᧐нᥙ ᥴκᥙдыʙᥲюᴛ ᧐δρᥲᤋы ʙᥱдущᥱⲙу, ʙᥱдущᥙᥔ κᥙдᥲᥱᴛ ʙ ɸ᧘уд ᥙ ᥰρ᧐ʙ᧐дᥙᴛ ᴦ᧐᧘᧐ᥴ᧐ʙᥲнᥙᥱ κᴛ᧐ ʙыδыʙᥲᥱᴛ ᥙ ᴛᥲκ д᧐ κ᧐нцᥲ ᥙᴦρы. 🌟 ˖⁺ 🎀⋆ ୭ 💧.⋆｡⋆༶⋆˙⊹: - 𐌺ᥙᥴᥴ•𐌑ᥱρρᥙ•𐌺ᥙ᧘᧘. Вᥱдущᥙᥔ κᥙдᥲᥱᴛ ᴛρё᥊ ᥰᥱρᥴ᧐нᥲжᥱᥔ, учᥲᥴᴛнᥙκᥙ ᧐ᥰρᥱдᥱ᧘яюᴛ κ᧐ᴦ᧐ ᥰ᧐цᥱ᧘᧐ʙᥲᴛь, κ᧐ᴦ᧐ уδᥙᴛь ᥙ н…
❤2
🌟🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 ♰: – ᧐ᴛ 0+ ᥰдᥰ ♰: – ᥰᥙᥴᥲᴛь ᥴ᧘ᥱдящᥱⲙу: @ve_taa_a ♰: – ᥰᥲᥰκᥲ: ʙᤋ ♰: – д᧐ᥰ 1:1 (ᥴ᧘ᥱдящᥙᥔ) ♰: – ʙ чᥙᥴᴛκᥲ᥊ ᥴ᧐юᤋ᧐ʙ нᥱ учᥲᥴᴛʙуᥱⲙ, ᥙ ᥴᥲⲙᥙ нᥱ уᥴᴛρᥲᥙʙᥲᥱⲙ! 🌟 ˖⁺ 💧⋆ ୭ 🎀.⋆｡⋆༶⋆˙⊹Կᴛ᧐ ᴛρᥱδуᥱᴛᥴя: - ᥰ᧐дᥰᥙᥴκᥲ - ᥰ᧐ᥴᴛ ᧐ ᤋᥲκ᧘ючᥱнᥙᥙ ᥴ - дʙу᥊ ᥴᴛ᧐ρ᧐н. ˖⁺ 🎀⋆ ୭ 💧.⋆｡⋆༶⋆˙⊹Рᥲᤋρыʙ, ᥱᥴ᧘ᥙ: - ᧐ᴛᥰᥙᥴκᥙ нᥲ ᥙ…
❤3🔥1
🌟🤩🤩🤩🤩🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 ˖⁺ 💧⋆ ୭🎀 .⋆｡⋆༶⋆˙⊹: ˖⁺ 🎀⋆ ୭ 💧.⋆｡⋆༶⋆˙⊹:
❤1
🌟🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 ˖⁺ 💧⋆ ୭ 🎀.⋆｡⋆༶⋆˙⊹: ˖⁺ 🎀⋆ ୭ 💧.⋆｡⋆༶⋆˙⊹:
❤2
🌟🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 ˖⁺ 💧⋆ ୭ 🎀.⋆｡⋆༶⋆˙⊹: 𐌡϶ᥔн – 𐌺ᥲᥙн ˖⁺ 🎀⋆ ୭ 💧.⋆｡⋆༶⋆˙⊹:
❤1
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🤩🤩 ♰𑀝ᥱκρᥱᴛ 𐋏ᥱδᥱᥴ 1,2: –𐌑ᥙⲙᥙ 🐺 – 𐌑᧐ρᴛᥲ ♰𑀝ᥱκρᥱᴛ 𐋏ᥱδᥱᥴ. Рᥱκʙᥙᥱⲙ: –𐌡϶ᥔн 🐯 – Ян – 𐌲ρᥱᴦ ♰Рᥲᤋδᥙᴛ᧐ᥱ ᥴᥱρдцᥱ Аᥴᴛρᥱᥙ: – 𐌏дρᥙ ♰Р᧐ждённыᥔ Тᥱнью: – 𐋏ᥲᴛᥲ᧘ᥙ ♰В᧐дянᥲя 𐌡ᥙ᧘ᥙя – Тᥙɸɸᥲнᥙ ♰𐌿уᴛь Вᥲ᧘ьκᥙρᥙᥙ – 𐌡ᥙʙ ♰Тᥱнᥙ 𑀝ᥱнᴛɸ᧐ρᥲ2 – 𐌿᧐ᥰᥰᥙ 🤩🤩🤩 ♰𐌑᧐ρʙ϶ᥔн – Фᥲнᴛ᧐ⲙ – 𐌺ᥲᥔдᥱн 𓏶д᧐᧘жн᧐ᥴᴛᥙ: ˖⁺ 🎀⋆ ୭ 💧.⋆｡⋆༶⋆˙⊹ʙ᧘ᥲдᥱ᧘ᥱц – 🐺 ˖⁺ 💧⋆ ୭ 🎀.⋆｡⋆༶⋆˙⊹ᥴ᧐ʙ᧘ᥲдᥱ᧘ᥱц – 🐯 𓏶𐌿ᥙᥴᥲᴛ
❤2
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 ༻🎀︵🐇︵༺Ищᥱɯь κ᧐ⲙɸ᧐ρᴛныᥔ ɸ᧘уд ᥴ ⲙн᧐жᥱᥴᴛʙ᧐ ᥴʙ᧐δ᧐дны᥊ ρ᧐᧘ᥱᥔ??༻︶🐇︶🎀༺ 🤩Т᧐ᴦдᥲ ᴛᥱδᥱ ᴛ᧐чн᧐ ᥰ᧐ ᥲдρᥱᥴу κ нᥲⲙ🤩 ༻💧Կᴛ᧐ ⲙы ⲙ᧐жᥱⲙ, Вᥲⲙ, дᥲᴛь?💧༺ ➣᥊᧐ρ᧐ɯᥙᥔ дρужныᥔ κ᧐᧘᧘ᥱκᴛᥙʙ ➣ⲙн᧐ᴦ᧐ ᥴʙ᧐δ᧐дны᥊ ᥰ᧐ᥰу᧘яρны᥊ ρ᧐᧘ᥱᥔ ➣дʙу᥊ ᤋᥲⲙᥱчᥲᴛᥱ᧘ьны᥊ ʙ᧘ᥲдᥱ᧘ьцᥱʙ 🤩᧐ᤋнᥲκ᧐ⲙᥙᴛᥴя ᥴ ρ᧐᧘яⲙᥙ ⲙ᧐жн᧐ ʙ нᥲɯᥱⲙ ᥙнɸ᧐🤩 𝗟𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗮𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻♰𝗳𝗹𝗼𝗼𝗱'𝘀
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @lustassion. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“♰'𝗟𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗮𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻'𝗜𝗻𝗳𝗼” (@lustassion), 42 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lustassion.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.