Красота🤍

Channel
𝑳𝒖𝒏𝒏𝒂 𝒘𝒂𝒔 𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒆.
@lunna_was_here
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
28subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003954673835 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lunna_was_here |
| Description | Пᴩиʙᴇᴛᴄᴛʙую нᴀ ᴋᴀнᴀᴧᴇ Лунны Бᴏᴩᴦ. Вᴄё ʙᴀжнᴏᴇ ʙ ɜᴀᴋᴩᴇᴨᴇ. Рᴀдᴀ ʙᴄᴇх ʙидᴇᴛь ✿ |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 22 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lunna_was_here |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:45 | 28 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:46 | 28 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 110.0%
- avg views ÷ 28 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 30.8
- 15 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 12.3%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 15
- of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (22 July 2026 – 1 August 2026) |
| Views total | 462 |
| Reactions total | 27 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 06:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 82
- Videos
- 5
- Links
- 40
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 33s
- Average length
- 17s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
27 reactions across 6 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5235466194957391224 | 17 | 63.0% | |
| custom 5289487503332498098 | 4 | 14.8% | |
| custom 5380069905498390420 | 3 | 11.1% | |
| custom 5222478952588664683 | 2 | 7.41% | |
| custom 5224582142238942433 | 1 | 3.70% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
File, posted without a caption
𝓛𝓤𝓝𝓐 𝓑𝓞𝓡𝓖 тгк: https://t.me/lunna_was_here
custom 52354661949573912243custom 52894875033324980981
ㅤ🍓🍓🍓🍓🍓🍓🍓🍓🍓🍓 —————————————————————— ᥱᥴⲧь 3 ρᥲⳅⲏыⲭ ᥴⲧυ᥈я, ⲃыⳝυρᥲύ 𐔖ⲇυⲏ ⲏᥲ ᥴⲃ𐔖ύ ⲃⲕ𐔤ᥴ, 𐔤ⲕᥲⳅᥲⲧь ᥒ𐔖ρяⲇⲕ𐔖ⲃыύ ⲏ𐔖ⲙᥱρ ⲫ𐔖ⲧ𐔖𐔏ρᥲⲫυυ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ 🤍правила🤍 🍓 ᥒᥱρᥱᥴ᥈ᥲⲧь ᥴⲃ𐔖ю 𐔖ᥴ (1–4 ⲫ𐔖ⲧ𐔖) (Желательно стоя в анфас) 🍓 ⳝыⲧь ᥒ𐔖ⲇᥒυᥴᥲⲏⲏыⲙ(𐔖ύ) ⲏᥲ ㅤ ㅤㅤtᥱᥣᥱⳋrᥲⲙ ⲕᥲⲏᥲ᥈ 🍓 ᥒᥱρᥱᥴ᥈ᥲⲧь ⲃ ᥴⲃ𐔖ύ tᥱᥣᥱⳋrᥲⲙ 🍓 𐔖ⲧⲙᥱⲧυⲧь ᥴⲃ𐔖ύ tᥱᥣᥱⳋrᥲⲙ (ᥱᥴ᥈υ ㅤ ㅤᥱᥴⲧь) 🍓🍓ПРОШУ, ПИШИТЕ НОМЕР КОТОРЫЙ ВЫБИРАЕТЕ🍓 🌟🤍𐔤ɥᥲᥴⲧⲏυⲕυ: 7/7🤍🌟 🌟𐔖ⲧ ⲙᥱⲏя 🌟 ⲫ𐔖ⲧ𐔖𐔏ρᥲⲫυυ ⲃ ⲃыⳝρ𐔖ⲏ𐔖ⲙ ⲃᥲⲙυ ᥴⲧυ᥈ᥱ …
custom 52354661949573912242
Анон: Здравствуйте Лунна, это рубрика "Топы по критериям" Топ 6 ос которых любят и вдохновляются 🤩> Здравствуйте, знаете тут будто у каждого по разному. Могу сказать что наверное по большинству люди тянутся к таким как Хана, Эйлин, Тея, Аника это из моих личных наблюдений. Но лично мне нравятся в плане творчества Дафна, Тея, Элиас, Эдит, Джесси и Мей в какой то степени вдохновляюсь ими🌸
custom 52354661949573912245custom 52894875033324980982custom 53800699054983904202
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩Никогда не задумывались как будет выглядеть ваш персонаж в других вселенных LEGO? 🤩Выберите от 1-2 эмодзи. Вселенные: 🦸♂️LEGO Marvel — это масштабная фантастическая супергероика, где магия, внеземные технологии и мутанты уживаются в одном огромном научно-фантастическом мире. 💅LEGO Friends — это сияющий эпицентр стиля, яркого самовыражения и безупречного вкуса в самом сердце Хартлейк-Сити. Это вселенн…
🤩похоже до некоторых не доходит масштаб проблемы под названием «головой поехавшие лия, мурмыз и его сестра», раз особые личности до сих пор за них. что ж, наверное нужно пояснить на пальчиках как в детском саду. честно, написал бы разоблачение, но думаю, обойдемся одним моим большим высказываением. лия уже давно показывала себя не с той стороны. постоянные шутки над реально не смешными ситуациями, такими как трагеди…
Анон: Вы смотрели 2 часть 4 сезона ? Если да то какие эмоции от неё и от сезона в принципе 🤩> Анонимки наконец то. Да всё посмотрела ещё в день слива, эмоции до сих пор зашкаливают положительные естественно. Качество супер но моментами непривычное, скажу честно. Обратила внимание на проработанность костюмов, почему то именно во второй части мне очень понравилась детализация. Сюжет неплохой, а относительного всего в…
custom 52224789525886646832custom 52354661949573912242
Анон: Как там Джесси ? 🤩> Нормально, но конечно лучше если вы спросите об этом у самой Джесси
Анон: Ночью ? 🤩> Почему нет
@LunnaAnonBot Попробуем анон?🤩
🔤🔤🔤 🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤 У меня отличные новости, первая часть истории Флова готова. Выложила сокращённую версию, в которую вошли первые пять глав 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 💙читать👿
custom 52354661949573912242custom 52245821422389424331
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @lunna_was_here. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 679,552 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝑳𝒖𝒏𝒏𝒂 𝒘𝒂𝒔 𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒆.” (@lunna_was_here), 28 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lunna_was_here.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.