Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Take a Ride at Luna Park

Channel

Take a Ride at Luna Park

@lunapark_en

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

551subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001984197787
TypeChannel
Username@lunapark_en
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/lunapark_en

Growth

5495515506 August 2026 — 549 subscribers7 August 2026 — 549 subscribers15 August 2026 — 551 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 549–551 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 16:55551+2
7 Aug 2026, 19:09549no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:32549first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 February 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
61.2%
avg views ÷ 551 subscribers
Avg views / post
337
1 post measured
Reaction rate
4.15%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026
Posts held20 (13 February 202527 July 2026)
Views total337
Reactions total14
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 20:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

257 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7328.4%
🔥6726.1%
❤‍🔥5320.6%
👍2810.9%
🦄228.56%
🤯72.72%
🌚31.17%
🎄20.778%
😁10.389%
🤪10.389%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 257reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 February 2025 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Jul 2026, 12:52 UTC337 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026

tl;dr: senior ML engineer and senior backend engineer (Rust), $90k-135k + equity, Tokyo Heard of Noeon Research? Symbolic architectures! Knowledge graphs! Category theory! Interpretable AI! A whole new paradigm! ✨ And thought: "Damn, what a cool company… shame I never signed up for category theory back in uni" 😭 No worries. Noeon needs more than formalists and mathematicians, they also need mere mortals engineers.

7🔥4🌚3

16 Apr 2026, 12:45 UTC≈1,680 views31 reactionsread 6 August 2026

tl;dr: AI researcher (EBM), $225k–$350k+ plus equity, San Francisco So, we’re hiring researchers for a startup building reasoning AI. Which is not uncommon per se, but here’s the situation: 💖 Founding Chair — Yann LeCun, Turing Award laureate and godfather of AI 💜 Chief Mathematician — Michael Freedman, Fields Medalist 💛 10 PhDs and six ICPC medalists on the team 💚 Founder is a quantum physicist from Berkeley who w

❤‍🔥13🤯6🔥5🦄4👍21

16 Apr 2026, 10:46 UTC985 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026

tl;dr: founding engineers, any experience lvl, $100k–300k + equity, remote/SF/Singapore You probably remember that tweet from Summer Yue, Meta’s director of alignment, where OpenClaw wiped her inbox so swiftly and decisively she had to sprint to her Mac Mini and kill the process 🔌 Now, OpenClaw is a console agent — and that’s the tame version. There are also browser ones — those “see” your screen and click around l

🔥84👍3

15 Apr 2026, 19:05 UTC712 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026

tl;dr: infrastructure engineer, $180k−250k + equity, US/Europe remote We haven’t covered Tzafon in a while — and they’ve been busy 💪 Tzafon is an applied AI lab building infrastructure and training models for highly multi-agent systems – think hundreds of concurrent agents. The founders are IMO and IOI medalists, the team is ex-Google, DeepMind, Altera, and MIT, and they raised a wild $9.7M pre-seed. Their platfor

🔥106❤‍🔥5

15 Apr 2026, 18:03 UTC621 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Hi! We know we haven't posted in a while, but we're back — with a bunch of great roles for you and all your friends! 🦄

16🔥4🦄3😁1

5 Jun 2025, 11:59 UTC≈2,300 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

tl;dr: senior software engineer, $255k-340k, lottery-free relocation to Berkeley, US We never mentioned this before — but one of our clients is advised by the most cited scientist in the world. Can you guess? It’s Yoshua Bengio — mathematician, computer scientist and one of the “godfathers of AI”. Bengio has an h-index of 247 (the highest in CS) and ~940000 citations — more than any other scientist alive! 🧿 And th

❤‍🔥62🤪1

29 May 2025, 16:14 UTC≈1,710 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

tl;dr: founding engineer, $110k-200k + equity, relocation to London G’day, it’s time for your annual inspection 📞 We’re always happy to discover a startup that automates a bunch of manual work in a non-obvious domain where for some reason no one has done it before. These companies usually don’t need to search for product-market fit — they fill a niche and things tend to go well for them 🌟 Please welcome today’s gu

🔥61

15 May 2025, 16:22 UTC≈1,440 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

tl;dr: neural network optimization engineer, $100k-150k/year + equity, London It only took a little moaning and groaning about the lack of Recraft news — and they raised $30M in Series B! The invocation worked, and now we’re writing a new post 😊 Recraft is an AI tool for designers. They are running their own model that beat DALL-E, Flux and Midjourney on a text-to-image arena. But Recraft’s main superpower lies in

6❤‍🔥4

15 May 2025, 15:22 UTC≈1,160 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

tl;dr: principal ML engineer, $130k-200k + equity, London Hey, this is the editors of Luna Park speaking. We simply can’t anymore. This is Recraft post number 10, jubilee edition. We have been hiring for them for two and a half years. During this time, we already wrote a happy birthday post, a post with technical details, a personal story post, a mysterious artsy post, a post about a new-model-that-beats-all-other

🔥7❤‍🔥4👍2

8 May 2025, 13:04 UTC974 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

tl;dr: 1: Infra / DevOps Engineer, 2: Kernel Engineer, $150k-220k/year + equity, US or remote We got you a new Tilde position! In fact, a couple of them 🍒 We already wrote about their research roles (still looking!), but in case you forgot who they are — it’s a startup from young Stanford grads that does applied interpretability. They are trying to understand what is happening inside current models and find new way

🔥81

28 Apr 2025, 15:01 UTC932 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

tl;dr: middle+ Python developer, AI Safety lab, relocation to London If you read our posts and think “this AI safety thing sounds great and all, but I’m just a smol Python enjoyer, not a cracked ML wizard”, then boy, we got amazing news for you. We are looking for a Python developer for Apollo Research’s evals team! 🐍 They are investigating models that act out alignment as part of their devious schemes and cloak-a

🔥6

24 Apr 2025, 14:10 UTC≈2,220 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

tl;dr: founding backend engineers, $150k-1M + equity, USA / remote Let’s say you want to change the world. We’re looking for Founding Backend Engineers for Eternis — a bold and brilliant AI startup from the post above: complex multi-agent interactions, security infrastructure to support them, $30M in funding, and founders with PhDs from top universities and multiple successful exits 🌟 Must-haves: ⏺️Exceptional pro

❤‍🔥6

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lunapark_en. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 214,707 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Take a Ride at Luna Park” (@lunapark_en), 551 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lunapark_en.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.