ββ γ €γ € βββ βπ€© literally βοΈe n βοΈer π

Channel
π«πΊπΌππππππΊ
@lunalivida
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Stars Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
594subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004204255198 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lunalivida |
| Created | Between 1 May 2026 and 26 July 2026β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lunalivida |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:05 | 594 | +3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 591 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR Β· 30 days
- 213.8%
- avg views Γ· 594 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,270
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (26 July 2026 β 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 25,405 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 03:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 24s
- Average length
- 21s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 2
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 2
- of 20 we hold a reading for Β· 10%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars β bought with money β on a post by @lunalivida. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramβs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Sticker, posted without a caption
π¨'π πππ π πππππ ππ ππΊπ ππππ πππΌπΎ. π¨ π½ππ'π πΌπΊππΎ πππΊπ ππΎπππ πΎ πππππ πΊπ»πππ ππΎ ππ πππΊπ πππΎπ πΌπππππΎ ππ ππΊπ π»πΎππππ½ ππ π»πΊπΌπ. π¨πΏ πππΎπ ππππ π ππΊπ½ ππππΎπππππ πππππ ππΊππππ, πππΎπ'π½ ππΊππΎ πππΎ πΌππππΊππΎ ππ ππΊπ ππ ππ ππ πΏπΊπΌπΎ πππππΎπΊπ½ ππΏ πππ½πππ πΊππ½ πππΎππΎππ½πππ ππ π»πΎ πππππΌπΎππ. π¨ πππππ πππΎ ππΎπππ πΎ π¨ πΌπππππΎ ππππ ππ ππππ πΎ ππΎπΊππ. π¨ π½ππ'π πππΎ πΊπππππΎ πππππΏ ππΏ πππ π¨ πΊπ. π¨πΏ πππ ππΎπππππΎπ π ππππ ππΎ, πππΎπ πππ πΊπ ππΎπΊπ½π ππππ ππ πΌππΊππΊπΌππΎπ. π¨'ππΎ ππΎππΎπ πΌπ πΊπππΎπ½β¦
π΅πΊπππππΎπ ππΎπΊπ π π π½ππ½ πππ πππΎ ππππΎπππΊππππΊπ πππΎπΌππΎπ πΌππ ππππΎ ππΊπ. πΆπΎππΎπππ ππΎπ πππ ππ πΊ πΌπππΎ πΏππππ ππ πππΎ 2010π, πΆπππΌππΎπ πππ πππΎππ π»πΎππ πΎππΎππ ππΎπΊπ, π»ππ π΅πΊπππππΎπ πΊππΎ ππΎππ πΊππ½ ππΎπ πΎππΊππ πΊπ ππππ πΎππΎππ ππΎπΊπ.
πππ'ππΎ πππΌπ πΊ πΌπππΏππππΊπ»π πΎ π ππΊπ.
File, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
File, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
πππΊπ πΊ π»πππππ ππ πΊππΎπ. ππ πΏπΊππππΎπ, ππ ππΎπππΊππ½π, ππ π½ππΊππππ, ππ ππΊπππππΎπ, ππππ π»ππ π π πΊππ½ πΊπππππππ ππΎπππ πΎ πΎππΎπππ½πΊπ π πππΎ πππΏ.
Posted without readable text
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lunalivida. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank β 986,374 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπ«πΊπΌππππππΊβ (@lunalivida), 594 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lunalivida.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.