Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Lumpen Papers

Channel

Lumpen Papers

@lumpenpapers

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,351subscribers

-42 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001371611262
TypeChannel
Username@lumpenpapers
Created12 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/lumpenpapers

Topic

Automotive — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,3516,3946,372.56 August 2026 — 6,393 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,393 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,394 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,387 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,384 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,377 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,375 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,369 subscribers3 September 2026 — 6,386 subscribers9 September 2026 — 6,391 subscribers12 September 2026 — 6,387 subscribers17 September 2026 — 6,388 subscribers25 September 2026 — 6,370 subscribers4 October 2026 — 6,372 subscribers11 October 2026 — 6,385 subscribers14 October 2026 — 6,376 subscribers18 October 2026 — 6,368 subscribers20 October 2026 — 6,358 subscribers23 October 2026 — 6,362 subscribers26 October 2026 — 6,366 subscribers28 October 2026 — 6,361 subscribers1 November 2026 — 6,359 subscribers3 November 2026 — 6,363 subscribers6 November 2026 — 6,357 subscribers9 November 2026 — 6,351 subscribers6 August 20269 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 95 days, net -42. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,345–6,400 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 10:466,351-6
6 Nov 2026, 05:286,357-6
3 Nov 2026, 14:386,363+4
1 Nov 2026, 01:086,359-2
28 Oct 2026, 22:216,361-5
26 Oct 2026, 06:356,366+4
23 Oct 2026, 06:316,362+4
20 Oct 2026, 14:046,358-10
18 Oct 2026, 00:086,368-8
14 Oct 2026, 18:596,376-9
11 Oct 2026, 05:566,385+13
4 Oct 2026, 21:416,372+2
25 Sept 2026, 17:596,370-18
17 Sept 2026, 00:006,388+1
12 Sept 2026, 17:596,387-4
9 Sept 2026, 00:006,391+5
3 Sept 2026, 22:426,386+17
28 Aug 2026, 07:076,369-6
19 Aug 2026, 00:466,375-2
16 Aug 2026, 08:186,377first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.8%
avg views ÷ 6,351 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,320
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.67%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held21 (23 July 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total9,239
Reactions total247
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 13:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
12s
Average length
6s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

906 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥44048.6%
custom 524680003812592376017819.6%
💔545.96%
custom 5278682838789534313495.41%
custom 5373053114347691692454.97%
💋444.86%
🤡313.42%
custom 5472355060333692148293.20%
custom 5255987608827214227192.10%
custom 5229040859458070099111.21%
😈60.662%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 906 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 21 we hold a reading for · 24%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lumpenpapers. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 4 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 7 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 09:21 UTC883 views39 reactionsread 6 November 2026

знакомая ситуация всем агентам: приходит модель с нулевым опытом и буком. дополнительно усложним всё тем, что ей пятнадцать лет, лицо ещё с детскими щёчками, редкий в силу типажа или национальности и от этого не ходовой типаж по Москве — клиенты присматриваются долго, ведь должен материализоваться тот самый проект, где подойдет всё вышеперечисленное. допустим, модель может подойти на загран. материнское агентство де…

💔18❤‍🔥9custom 52786828387895343138🤡2custom 53730531143476916922

4 Nov 2026, 08:33 UTC921 views3 reactionsread 6 November 2026

как поставить на гудок

❤‍🔥1💋1custom 53730531143476916921

4 Nov 2026, 08:33 UTC975 views25 reactions2 Starsread 6 November 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥9💋7custom 52786828387895343136custom 53730531143476916923

18 Oct 2026, 13:39 UTC≈1,990 views93 reactions3 Starsread 6 November 2026

кажется, я репостнула всё, что увидела касательно главной для меня новости сезона — спасибо вам всем за поддержку! но, возможно, не все понимают, как важно сделать такое шоу сейчас для российской модели. да ещё и самое цитируемое за сезон благодаря безупречным вкусовым и визуальным составляющим. я счастлива, что именно Tom Ford лишил Даню международной подиумной «девственности», а не какой-то другой модный дом. оче…

custom 537305311434769169238custom 524680003812592376033custom 525598760882721422715🤡6custom 52290408594580700991

18 Oct 2026, 13:21 UTC≈1,690 views26 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @fshncobraPhoto

Зацените, на первой фото наш русский пацан из Lumpen Даниил Кондратьев, муж верховной. Вот такой разъеб собачка.🐶 Tom Ford SPRING 2027 READY-TO-WEAR By Haider Ackermann 🐍 #дизайнерыибренды

❤‍🔥23custom 52468000381259237602custom 53730531143476916921

16 Oct 2026, 17:33 UTC≈1,510 views40 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @fakoshima_labPhoto

Второй красавчик с показа Tom Ford – Даниил Кондратьев (Shaka), в России материнское агентство Lumpen Поздравляем Даню и Авдотью Александрову. Мы не знаем как они это сделали и какой путь прошли, но это мега круто! Shaka снимался у нас для Contre Culture и Plenilunium.

❤‍🔥28💋6🤡2custom 52290408594580700991custom 52468000381259237601custom 52559876088272142271custom 52786828387895343131

16 Oct 2026, 12:55 UTC≈1,270 views21 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Forwarded from @graziarussiaPhoto

На подиумах прошедших Недель моды можно было заметить много моделей из российских агентств. Мы решили познакомиться с ними ближе. Для этого — составили блиц, который помог нам узнать о модельной сфере в 2026-м и личных впечатлениях героев от шоу и кастингов. Читайте по ссылке. Grazia в MAX

custom 524680003812592376014💋6❤‍🔥1

8 Aug 2026, 16:46 UTC875 views57 reactionsread 12 August 2026

когда гуляю по городу с сэмплом сумки-фары, я всегда получаю ни с чем не сравнимые эмоции от взаимодействия с людьми. как-то на Патриарших внешне очень обеспеченный мужчина долго вглядывался в fara stop bag и с восторгом произнёс: «это же сумка? просто браво, у меня была девятка!» мне очень хотелось поскорее сделать партию сумок, чтобы разделить эти эмоции с их будущими владельцами. и вот теперь я читаю похожие исто…

❤‍🔥42💔9💋5🤡1

8 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC907 views49 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @ponimaeshochemyaPhoto

Во-первых, забыла уточнить, что если в специальный кармашек положить телефон с включенным фонариком, то фара горит. Во-вторых, сейчас я иду по Тверскому бульвару, и сегодня здесь сходка владельцев отечественных машин — «Жигулей», пятёрок, шестёрок, девяток и всех прочих. И я, конечно, только что произвела фурор с этой сумкой. Из забавного: мужчины спросили, сколько стоит эта сумка. Я сказала: 50 тысяч. Они были в ш…

❤‍🔥33💋11custom 52468000381259237605

8 Aug 2026, 11:40 UTC939 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @ponimaeshochemya

На самом деле, я хотела этот клатч с того самого момента, как увидела его у Авдотьи, как только он появился. Он мне сразу очень понравился. Потом мне его ещё скинула София. Но как-то всё было не вовремя и не в тему. А вчера Денис совершенно неожиданно подарил мне его. Очень люблю такие истории, когда вещь рождается из ручного труда, собственной идеи и вырастает из другого проекта. У Авдотьи есть проект, связанный с…

❤‍🔥14custom 52468000381259237604💔3

8 Aug 2026, 10:14 UTC≈1,010 views27 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @ponimaeshochemyaPhoto

Вообще, надо сказать, настроение дня — клатч-фара от лады.

❤‍🔥15😈6💋3🤡3

8 Aug 2026, 09:27 UTC≈1,060 views29 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

сегодня в 20:00 делаю интересный интерактивчик на маркете Джув, где также развернулся наш небольшой корнер. а в 2:00 ночи муж играет сет. всё будет на дизайн заводе, приходите, можно будет потрогать и приобрести сумки-фары — осталось всего три штуки! на интерактив вход бесплатный, а на вечеринку будет нужен билет, промокод на скидку lumpen20

❤‍🔥15custom 52468000381259237608💋5🤡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @lumpenpapers. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @lumpenpapers as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
7 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
3 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

KSUSHA SMO
@styledbysmo · 38,697
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 31 August 2026
SALAVAT KYPERE
@salavat_kypere · 46,313
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 27 August 2026
Olga Karput 🥬
@okarput · 31,073
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 8 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Lumpen Papers” (@lumpenpapers), 6,351 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lumpenpapers.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.