Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝓁𝓊𝓂𝓅𝒾𝓈 𝓈 𝒾𝓃𝒻𝑜ㅤ♡゙

@lump1s

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

12subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002657777115
TypeChannel
Username@lump1s
Descriptionактуальный дм @sonozakiirl
Created27 May 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/lump1s

Growth

129 August 2026 — 12 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12 subscribers9 August 202612 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11–13 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 05:1512no change
9 Aug 2026, 14:4712first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 27 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
3
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

507 reactions across 7 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 540882969370718686011121.9%
custom 54138532034207083078516.8%
custom 53732569792653879386011.8%
custom 54093780536567048135811.4%
custom 5373009133882606307305.92%
🆒254.93%
custom 5386867219525306448234.54%
custom 5215696499148620349193.75%
custom 5409176666935163682193.75%
💘142.76%
custom 5409025428251769381112.17%
custom 5215729024935956422101.97%
custom 537774530169408747781.58%
custom 540890644477276523181.58%
custom 541114558302286295581.58%
custom 541118114964704072871.38%
custom 521778763282569732761.18%
custom 539812044186271056350.986%

Custom emoji. 16 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 507reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2025 to 11 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
21
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 8 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lump1s. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 May 2025 to 11 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Jan 2026, 23:08 UTC≈1,950 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 537300913388260630710custom 53732569792653879386custom 52157290249359564224

4 Jan 2026, 23:07 UTC≈1,960 views59 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤍 your opinion. 🤩🤩✉️🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🤩

custom 537300913388260630720custom 521569649914862034919custom 537325697926538793814custom 52157290249359564226

4 Jan 2026, 23:06 UTC≈1,960 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 52177876328256973276

30 Sept 2025, 08:52 UTC≈2,870 views64 reactions10 Starsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @mybfgfPhoto

ㅤㅤ 🎁 ¿ mybfgf.t.me ᛝ . . ㅤ⋮ ⤿ ТУПО МОЯ ГФ 一 КЁКО КИРИГИРИ ֶָ֢. 😻 danganronpa . .🤩ㅤㅤ

custom 537325697926538793831custom 538686721952530644812💘11custom 53777453016940874775🆒3custom 53981204418627105632

30 Jun 2025, 21:26 UTC≈4,120 views37 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 541385320342070830722custom 53732569792653879389💘3custom 53868672195253064482custom 53981204418627105631

30 Jun 2025, 21:25 UTC≈4,170 views269 reactions11 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🤍 🤩🤍🤩умпис 🤩иригири🎀 🎀🤩 anon🤍arts🤍yume 🤍side🤍tgh 🍼 🤩🤩✉️🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🤩 ⬜⬜🤍tap react if you like me 🤍

custom 540882969370718686096custom 540937805365670481358custom 541385320342070830742🆒22custom 540902542825176938111custom 53868672195253064489custom 54089064447727652318custom 54091766669351636828

27 May 2025, 14:44 UTC≈4,430 views52 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 541385320342070830721custom 540882969370718686015custom 540917666693516368211custom 53777453016940874773custom 53981204418627105632

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @lump1s. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 668,890 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝓁𝓊𝓂𝓅𝒾𝓈 𝓈 𝒾𝓃𝒻𝑜ㅤ♡゙” (@lump1s), 12 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lump1s.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.