Channel
@luminacryptowallet
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,044subscribers
+889 since we began measuring on 25 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1004308919706 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @luminacryptowallet |
| Description | Self-custody crypto wallet with built-in scam detection. Understand transaction risks before you sign. 🌐 luminawallet.org |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 24 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 24 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| On Telegram | t.me/luminacryptowallet |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Sept 2026, 23:22 | 1,044 | no change |
| 16 Sept 2026, 03:40 | 1,044 | -25 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 03:35 | 1,069 | -28 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 15:02 | 1,097 | -167 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 08:42 | 1,264 | +1,109 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:01 | 155 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (24 July 2026 – 31 August 2026) |
| Views total | 268 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 24 Sept 2026, 23:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
16 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 10 | 62.5% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 31.3% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 6.25% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Crypto Security Is Layered Recent incidents illustrate two different risks. A compromised verified account can promote a fraudulent token, while a vulnerable DeFi protocol can expose funds even when its contracts and assets appear legitimate. Before interacting, verify four separate layers: Source: Confirm important announcements through the project’s official website and another independent channel. Asset: Verify th…
❤3👏1
Security Alert: Why a legitimate token can still carry protocol risk GoPlus Security has reported an oracle manipulation involving Moonwell, where approximately $8 million was drained. According to the analysis, a thin-liquidity asset used as collateral allowed its oracle price to be manipulated. The important lesson is that a legitimate token and contract do not automatically make a DeFi interaction safe. The protoc…
❤1👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
👍3❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
👍1
Video, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Your 12-word recovery phrase is the key to your wallet. Keep it offline and store it somewhere secure. Never share it, never enter it on an unknown website, and never send it to anyone claiming to be customer support. The Lumina team cannot access or recover your recovery phrase — and we will never ask you for it. If someone asks for your 12 words, they are trying to steal your wallet. Official website: https://lumin…
Security notice: @Walletlumina is not affiliated with Lumina Wallet. Lumina has not announced any token, pump.fun launch, airdrop, or Perps integration. Our only official X account is @getluminawallet. Never trust contract addresses or wallet links shared by unofficial accounts.
👍2
🔒 Choosing a crypto wallet should be easy. Reality usually looks like this: 🤔 "This one looks great." 💥 Doesn't support your network. 🤔 "Okay... what about this one?" 💥 Perfect for DeFi. Not so perfect for everything else. Welcome to crypto. 😅 The truth is, there isn't one wallet that's perfect for everyone. Some are built for managing assets across multiple chains. Some shine in DeFi. Others focus on a single …
👍2
Lumina Wallet was featured by LetsExchange among five crypto wallets worth exploring in July 2026. Thank you to their team for highlighting our security-first, multi-chain approach.
More assets should not mean more uncertainty. Lumina supports 18,360 tokens across 10+ chains in one self-custody wallet. Before you send or sign, Lumina helps screen destination addresses and explains transaction risks in clear language. More choice. More context. You stay in control. https://luminawallet.org
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @luminacryptowallet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Lumina Wallet” (@luminacryptowallet), 1,044 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/luminacryptowallet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.