Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Lumière

Channel

Lumière

@lumiereshop1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

264subscribers

+130 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004292761008
TypeChannel
Username@lumiereshop1
CreatedBetween 1 May 2026 and 2 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/lumiereshop1

Growth

1342641999 August 2026 — 134 subscribers9 August 2026 — 134 subscribers17 August 2026 — 264 subscribers9 August 202617 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +130. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 115–284 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 21:56264+130
9 Aug 2026, 19:30134no change
9 Aug 2026, 19:17134first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 2 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.3%
avg views ÷ 264 subscribers
Avg views / post
43.1
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.39%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held16 (2 June 20269 August 2026)
Views total603
Reactions total32
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 19:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
46s
Average length
46s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

32 reactions across 6 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👾1650.0%
❤‍🔥515.6%
🤯412.5%
🍓39.38%
26.25%
🍾13.13%
👌13.13%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 2 June 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC6 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @lilithbanrePhoto

🪐🦇 اگر تو ام عاشق جادوگری ولی نمیدونی از کجا شروع کنی اینجا برای توعه! کلی کتاب طلسم و جادوگری دارن اونم با قیمت مناسب و جلد های تکمیل و ترجمه فارسی که هیچ جا پیدا نمیشه🦋🕷 اگر میخوای ویچ شی اینجارو اصلا از دست نده. https://t.me/Atarix_shop 🌟🌟💧

9 Aug 2026, 18:30 UTC6 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @Atarix_shopPhoto

#آرایشی پلت سایه سه تایی ༺𓆩🖤𓆪༻ دارای سه رنگه(مشکی/طلایی/سفید) پیگمنت بالایی داره ༺𓆩🖤𓆪༻ قیمت: 150T جهت خرید: @Atarix_Admin 𓆩♱ 𝕬𝖙𝖆𝖗𝖎𝖝 ♱𓆪

9 Aug 2026, 15:26 UTC19 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

این جمعه بازار تلگرام هم خیلی شگفت انگیزه ها خیلی چیزهای جالب توش پیدا میشه😭

1🍓1

9 Aug 2026, 15:24 UTC17 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @AngeliicastorePhoto

٬ . ࣪.𝄞photocard طرح دلخواه Price: 25 each 𐔌՞. ₓ .՞𐦯 #available Order: @nixxxiu 💭₊˚ : @angeliicastore

9 Aug 2026, 15:24 UTC15 viewsread 9 August 2026

درمورد فتوکارت ها: همشون طرح دلخواه هستن آماده نداریم . ָ࣪ .سایز: 8.5x5.5 ָ࣪ .لمینت شده ָ࣪ .تک رو ָ࣪ .قابل سفارش از آیدل های کیپاپ، خواننده های دیگه، کرکتر انیمه/مانهوا/سریال و... در نظر داشته باشید هرچقدر فایلتون با کیفیت تر باشه ایتم قشنگ تر و باکیفیت تر چاپ میشه . لطفا موقع ثبت سفارش فایل بفرستید .

9 Aug 2026, 15:20 UTC21 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @YamireishopPhoto

اینجا میتونین مرچ دلخواه خودتونو دیزاین کنین با عکس و ایده های ناز خودتون 🌟 از جاکلیدی، آویز، پوستر، فوتوکارت تا استیکر🪽 و همشون با قیمت های خیلی مناسب😄 @Yamireishop @Yamireishop @Yamireishop

9 Aug 2026, 14:26 UTC24 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @librisstore

اولین چالش لیبریس آغاز شد.🕰 اگه همیشه دلت می‌خواست یه ژورنال دست‌ساز لیبریس همراهت باشه، این فرصت برای توعه!🤎 { توی این گیو‌اوی قراره 4 برنده داشته باشیم:} نفر اول: ژورنال لیبریس سایز A6 (از مجموعه مدل‌ها و چرم‌های موجود) نفر دوم: پک پوستر و استیکر نفر سوم: بوکمارک و آویز نفر چهارم: کد تخفیف خرید از لیبریس برای ثبت حضورتون تو گیواوی حتما شرایط زیر رو انجام بدین خوشگلا :) 1. حتما توی Libris و poetic poison جوین باش

9 Aug 2026, 14:26 UTC26 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @librisstoreVideo

ویدئوی #کاربرد_ژورنال‌ های چرمی🤎🧳 ویدئو اختصاصی میباشد. تمام آیتم‌های توی ویدئو که از محصولات چنل هستن قابل سفارشن.

1

9 Aug 2026, 11:59 UTC62 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

به اطلاعتون برسونم که هرکدوم از این ایتم ها روشون پرونده هست که فقط برای صاحبشه و شما هیچوقت نمی‌فهمید چی برسر هرکدومشون اومده 😔

🤯4

9 Aug 2026, 11:55 UTC63 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

از این شپش بنفشا بدین بهش😖😖😖

🍓2

9 Aug 2026, 11:49 UTC69 views18 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

اسپویل اپلود این هفته هر شب ساعت 10🫟🧬 وقتی انفجار اتفاق افتاد هیچکس اسمشون رو به یاد نمی‌اورد.ازشون فقط چندتا عضو باقی مونده بود. اخرین تیکه هایی که حاضر نبودن صاحبشون رو فراموش کنن. شاید شما فقط یه مشت دست و پا ببینید اما حقیقتا این کالکشن درباره لحظه ایه که یه زندگی از هم میپاشه! هر عضو متعلق به یه آدمه و پشتش راز و رمز فراوونی وجود داره. هرکدوم از این اعضا دنبال یه صاحب امین میگردن که بتونن خاطراتشون رو برای آخری

👾16🍾1👌1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @lumiereshop1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 446,101 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Lumière” (@lumiereshop1), 264 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lumiereshop1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.