🤩 ִ ︵ 🧪 ┊ ֺ 𝐯𝐩𝐧 ִ 𝓌𝓌 🎀 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝖕𝐫𝐨𝐱𝐲 ݄ 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑓 ◝ ︶ִ ⏝ 💕 ׄ не можешь😀 найти хороший впн ⸝⸝ ︵ ִ ݃ ᅠ ◟ или прокси для телеграмма 😻 ⏝ ִ︶ 🎀 ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ💋 ݄ 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑛 ֺ 𝖘𝐮𝐛𝐬𝐜𝐫𝐢𝐝𝐞 𝑡𝑎𝑘𝑒𝑏𝑜𝑡 ִ 𝖓𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐠𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 ✨ ֺ ︵
Signed . 𓏴𝓜𝗮ׄ͜ 𝓭𝓸𝓴𝓪

Channel
@luka_nation
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
805subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003877183172 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @luka_nation |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/luka_nation |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:08 | 805 | +7 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:00 | 798 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (7 August 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,509 |
| Reactions total | 96 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
96 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5474633042268027213 | 27 | 28.1% | |
| custom 5359686639251650079 | 22 | 22.9% | |
| custom 5357399015115747531 | 14 | 14.6% | |
| custom 5370907224132589475 | 14 | 14.6% | |
| custom 5310102998460961426 | 10 | 10.4% | |
| custom 5357495896693044483 | 9 | 9.38% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 96reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤩 ִ ︵ 🧪 ┊ ֺ 𝐯𝐩𝐧 ִ 𝓌𝓌 🎀 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝖕𝐫𝐨𝐱𝐲 ݄ 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑓 ◝ ︶ִ ⏝ 💕 ׄ не можешь😀 найти хороший впн ⸝⸝ ︵ ִ ݃ ᅠ ◟ или прокси для телеграмма 😻 ⏝ ִ︶ 🎀 ⎯ׅ⎯ׄ💋 ݄ 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑛 ֺ 𝖘𝐮𝐛𝐬𝐜𝐫𝐢𝐝𝐞 𝑡𝑎𝑘𝑒𝑏𝑜𝑡 ִ 𝖓𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐠𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 ✨ ֺ ︵
Signed . 𓏴𝓜𝗮ׄ͜ 𝓭𝓸𝓴𝓪
ㅤ@ Hope's Peak Academy › › ㅤㅤ꒰ 𝘞𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘪𝘴 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘶𝘭𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘦𝘯𝘵 ? ꒱ ╭┄࣭ 𖧋╭ִ 𓄰─𖧋 ─𓄰─𖧋 ─ ╯𓆪 𝆭 𝆹𝅥 𓆩 𝆭 𝆹𝅥 Официальный канал ⋮︎ самой известной и элитной академии в мире ! ‹ « Пик Надежды » ! [︵ Не хотели бы присоединиться к зрителям? Или, может, у вас тоже есть выдающийся талант? ↵]
Signed . 𓏴𝓜𝗮ׄ͜ 𝓭𝓸𝓴𝓪
𝗐𝗂𝗍𝗁 𝗅𝗈𝗏𝖾, @luka_nation𝄒𝄒 #luka 🥩🥩 . . bot 🥹chat 🥹boost🥹 🥹🥹៸ credit: mim00ng 𝓿𝓲𝓪 X . . 🥩 . .#art #only
custom 54746330422680272133custom 53709072241325894752custom 53101029984609614261
Signed ꉹ ۫۫ 𝐾𝑒𝑖𝑠𝑒𝑟 ۪۪ 鯨
𝗐𝗂𝗍𝗁 𝗅𝗈𝗏𝖾, @luka_nation𝄒𝄒 #luka 🥩🥩 . . bot 🥹chat 🥹boost🥹 🥹🥹៸ credit: eggytime_ 𝓿𝓲𝓪 X . . 🥩 . .#art #only
custom 53596866392516500798custom 54746330422680272132custom 53101029984609614261
Signed ꉹ ۫۫ 𝐾𝑒𝑖𝑠𝑒𝑟 ۪۪ 鯨
╰︎꯭─ֺ─ ֺ 𝐖𝐞𝑙𝐜ુ𝐦𝐞 𝅄🤍 ⃝⬚ 𝓉𝑜 ㅤᮬ ︶ִ⏝︶ִ🤍 𔓕 ྀི ﹫ ֵ 𝐽𝓪𝓷𝓮 𝑠𝒕𝑖𝒄𝓀𝒆𝑟𝒔 ⊱ 𝂅ㅤ𐑺ֺ . . . 𝐁 эт𝑜м тгк м𝑜жн𝑜 𝒵аказать качественные эм𝑜дзи 𐎀🤍 ༢ུ ֺ ᚚ ֵ۫ 𓈒 ִ۫ ꯭𓎟ִֺ𓎟
Signed κɪʀɑʀɑ κɑⲩɑⲛ૦!! 13:30 °#John'sMistress . z Z
💋 Гиперборея, ушедшая золотой рай… Вот что приходит на ум, когда я вижу её. Её древнее и благородное происхождение, несомненно, столь же тяжёлое бремя, как и впечатляющие рога на голове, но она справляется со всем с лёгкостью. 🎀🎀🎀🥹🥹😀😀 🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀😀😀 🥹🥹 💋Он кажется вежливым и обходительным, но почему-то животные его боятся… Когда он проходит мимо Детей Морозной Луны, я делюсь с ним частью ежедневного урожая. Понравилась ди…
Signed . 𓏴𝓜𝗮ׄ͜ 𝓭𝓸𝓴𝓪
𝗐𝗂𝗍𝗁 𝗅𝗈𝗏𝖾, @luka_nation𝄒𝄒 #luka 🥩🥩 . . bot 🥹chat 🥹boost🥹 🥹🥹៸ credit: @tsukihakaa 𝓿𝓲𝓪 X . . 🥩 . .#art #only
custom 53101029984609614266custom 54746330422680272133custom 53573990151157475312custom 53709072241325894752
Signed [🇬🇧🇦🇺] НЕТ ИНЕТА | 🍌 леклер #млврейдеры #thongs
❌ www. 🥹 🤩ℯsna DAiL𝓎. x cf 🌟 🎀😻понравился новый персонаж 🤩нежной 🤩есна? тогда вы по адресу !
Signed . 𓏴𝓜𝗮ׄ͜ 𝓭𝓸𝓴𝓪
𝗐𝗂𝗍𝗁 𝗅𝗈𝗏𝖾, @luka_nation𝄒𝄒 #luka 🥩🥩 . . bot 🥹chat 🥹boost🥹 🥹🥹៸ credit: @nz_143_ 𝓿𝓲𝓪 X . . 🥩 . .#art #only
custom 53596866392516500798custom 53573990151157475312
Signed [🇬🇧🇦🇺] НЕТ ИНЕТА | 🍌 леклер #млврейдеры #thongs
🥹🥹🤩🤩🥹да, я кинню Велиону, и я часто ревную, но не говорю об этом открыто 🥹@hi3rdkinnie
Signed κɪʀɑʀɑ κɑⲩɑⲛ૦!! 13:30 °#John'sMistress . z Z
⬜ ⎯⎯ 🐈⬛ › ⋮ 𝐖𝐀𝐈𝐓 💕 🤩 ◟ 𝗅𝗎𝗄𝖺.. 🎀ֺ 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗍𝖾 ⏜ 😀«ДА, Я ЛУКА КИННИ, И . .» ︶⏝ 🎀. ассоциируете себя 🤩 с лукой😀😀 из алнст . . or кинните его ? ⏝ ֺ ┈┈ или он просто вам нравится ? 📢 𝓈ℴ . . ⇌ 𝐬𝐮𝐛𝐬𝐜𝐫𝐢𝐛𝐞 🎁 ︵ֺ︵
custom 53574958966930444834custom 53709072241325894751
Signed . 𓏴𝓜𝗮ׄ͜ 𝓭𝓸𝓴𝓪
𝗐𝗂𝗍𝗁 𝗅𝗈𝗏𝖾, @luka_nation𝄒𝄒 #luka 🥩🥩 . . bot 🥹chat 🥹boost🥹 🥹🥹៸ credit: @fancylxncy 𝓿𝓲𝓪 X . . 🥩 . .#art #only
custom 53709072241325894758custom 54746330422680272137custom 53574958966930444834custom 53101029984609614262custom 53573990151157475311custom 53596866392516500791
Signed НЕТ ИНЕТА | 🍌 леклер #млврейдеры #thongs
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @luka_nation. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 229,964 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@luka_nation named 6 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝓛𝗎𝗄𝖺 𝖭𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇. X2 #2312” (@luka_nation), 805 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/luka_nation.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.