Channel
@ludkaizbudki
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
694subscribers
-60 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001683621024 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ludkaizbudki |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ludkaizbudki |
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 16:17 | 694 | -106 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:44 | 800 | +16 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 12:39 | 784 | +32 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:07 | 752 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:46 | 754 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
237 reactions across 20 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 68 | 28.7% | |
| 🔥 | 47 | 19.8% | |
| 😁 | 39 | 16.5% | |
| ❤ | 17 | 7.17% | |
| custom 5325605283483885121 | 10 | 4.22% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 3.80% | |
| 👏 | 9 | 3.80% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 2.53% | |
| 🏆 | 5 | 2.11% | |
| 🗿 | 5 | 2.11% | |
| 🙈 | 5 | 2.11% | |
| 🤗 | 5 | 2.11% | |
| 💊 | 4 | 1.69% | |
| 👀 | 3 | 1.27% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 1.27% | |
| 🙉 | 2 | 0.844% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 237 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Динамо это самый унылый клуб РПЛ, им дали изи календарь на старте, а они со всеми бедолагами на 0:0 страдают. Тюкавин в тильте, он явно рассчитывал перейти в Зенит и стать богаче, остальные только у Ролана Гусева из-под палки бегали, сейчас пришел этот шарлатан, адепт атакующего футбола, только от его атаки в глазах нулями рябит
😁7💯3👍1
Папара! По этому трансферу комментарии есть? Как по мне, странный переход Трабзонспор явно не самый богатый клуб Турции, и не самый престижный. Больших задач нет, играть будут в квалах Лиги Европы Арабов там немного, вау эффекта этот переход не произведет, а самый звездный игрок у них - Андре Онана 😨 Либо старичка уже совсем не котируют, либо сильно проебались англичане В каком-нибудь Фулхэме, Кристал Пэласе и особе…
😁6❤1👍1
Гудмонинг вьетнам!! Вчера сдох на футболе, сегодня на улице. +27 жары, ноль ветра и влажность. Рекомендую попробовать тем, кто любит насилие над организмом В конце августа точно на море надо двигать, тоже подскакивайте 🤭 Рассказываю ситуасьон: Недавно после каждой игры стала пиздец как болеть пятка. Утром просто невозможно на ногу наступить, потом потихоньку она проходит, и до следующего матча такая же хуйня поверьт…
😁5👀3🔥1
Сейчас играют Оренбург с Зенитом Взял гол Соболева и пенальти Предполагаю, эти события произойдут одновременно
🤣8🏆3🔥1
Это пиздец откуда боты лезут и для чего?
🗿5🙈5🙉2
Бля Оказалось это пизлец че за спойлер Не смотрите
👏4😁2🔥1
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥5🤣2❤1
Video message, posted without a caption
🤗5❤2🤣2
Ладно, вы не шарите молчуны, скучно в своем же канале кроме Виктора никто двух слов связать не может И это при том, что до ЧМ у меня было 400 подписчиков Сейчас 300 ебал ботами кто-то подкинул. Нахуя? Мы же выпиздим вас как только вы ебало раскроете Хз, пацаны, я сам в бытовом тильте последнюю неделю, щас немного не до шуточек про писи, если что не так базарю, тормозите меня
❤6👌3😁2
Там Усман разьебал какого-то борчика с 0 поражений и вроде идет в ЮФС Я не смотрел бой, что там было? Но могу сказать, что в ЮФС ему не надо, он звезда ПФЛа, у него нет досрочных побед, его не подпишут за большие деньги и он тупо затеряется в дивизионе ПФЛ его боготворит и платит несмотря на все победы решением. Они его сделали, там и надо оставаться. В ЮФС это будет второй Мовсар с 0 поражений и 0 титульных боев
🔥5😁2👍1
Там Мудрика разбанили Усиление в Челси подъехало откуда не ждали
🔥7🤣3👍1
Для кого-то расчищают место в Реале.. 🧐
🔥7😁2👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ludkaizbudki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Лудка из Будки” (@ludkaizbudki), 694 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ludkaizbudki.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.