Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Главная по продукту | Людмила Коломацкая

Channel

Главная по продукту | Людмила Коломацкая

@luda_znaet

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

456subscribers

-16 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001850537136
TypeChannel
Username@luda_znaet
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/luda_znaet

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4564724647 August 2026 — 472 subscribers8 August 2026 — 472 subscribers15 August 2026 — 469 subscribers23 August 2026 — 465 subscribers30 August 2026 — 462 subscribers7 September 2026 — 460 subscribers13 September 2026 — 456 subscribers7 August 202613 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 37 days, net -16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 454–474 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 20:20456-4
7 Sept 2026, 02:17460-2
30 Aug 2026, 11:07462-3
23 Aug 2026, 18:43465-4
15 Aug 2026, 17:42469-3
8 Aug 2026, 04:45472no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:09472first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 8 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 08s
Average length
43s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

221 reactions across 17 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥9342.1%
custom 53437268414274057127835.3%
custom 52582037947720858544620.8%
🤔41.81%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 221 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 8 January 2026 to 27 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @luda_znaet. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 January 2026 to 27 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Apr 2026, 15:47 UTC95 views13 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Секрет раскрыт... Да что ж такое как только соберусь вернуться в канал обязательно что-то происходит 🤔Сижу и размышляю это я так саботирую своё возвращение или дело в другом? Тема есть, идеи для контента, экспертность никуда не делась, только что торможу А дело то в чужой реальности, в купленном чужом мнении Как только я понимаю "вот это мне нравится, это моё", пространство сразу проверяет. А точно ли ты хочешь? М

🔥5🤔3custom 53437268414274057123custom 52582037947720858542

21 Apr 2026, 16:45 UTC78 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Написать пост и пропасть? Да, умею, практикую😅 Поделюсь честно, что происходит. Помимо того, что я прохожу довольно сложный этап трансформации, причем сразу во всех сферах меня вдруг накрыл вопрос "А в чем вообще моя сила?" Вместо того чтобы просто заниматься тем, что я умею, люблю и у меня хорошо получается, я решила устроить себе испытание. Походила с полгодика, поныла "Ничего не понимаю, кто я, о чем я вообще?"

🔥6custom 53437268414274057126custom 52582037947720858543

25 Mar 2026, 10:57 UTC91 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Тема про продукты и услуги в моменте трансформации это действительно интересно Когда внутри всё меняется, добавляются новые знания, осознания, навыки, старые форматы перестают работать. Возникает вопрос, а как теперь всё это реализовать, как упаковать, как предлагать людям🤔 🧠Я сейчас как раз прохожу этот путь и мне интересно самой разбираться, как в новой парадигме создавать то, что приносит удовольствие и пользу.

custom 53437268414274057125🔥3custom 52582037947720858542

25 Mar 2026, 10:56 UTC78 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Конечно остаемся)нам все интересно,особенно , что делать с этим продуктом в моменте трансфориации))👍🎉❤️

custom 53437268414274057121

25 Mar 2026, 10:56 UTC74 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @olesyagoncharova_community

мы Вас ждали! я точно! главное что Вы дошли до момента, когда можно и рассказать )) хоть что-нибудь ))

custom 53437268414274057121

24 Mar 2026, 17:42 UTC81 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Возвращение блудной дочери За последние несколько месяцев моего отсутствия я не писала не потому что нечего рассказывать, а потому что не знала с чего начать😵‍💫 Переехала, начала активно смотреть в себя, в свои ценности, в голову, в тело. Погрузилась в психологию, коучинг, работу с мышлением, прошла обучение Access. Начала замечать свои сильные стороны и понимать как они могут работать на меня В процессе трансформ

custom 53437268414274057127🔥6custom 52582037947720858542

30 Jan 2026, 18:36 UTC156 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Ты либо кормишь свои страхи Либо кормишь свое будущее Вот и прошла моя защита перед жюри. Было ли страшно? Да Стоило ли оно того? Однозначно да Эта защита стала для меня не просто этапом в премии, а глубокой рефлексией. Посмотрела на себя со стороны, отцифровала свой путь, свои сильные стороны, кто я как эксперт и зачем я делаю то, что делаю Сформулировала свою ключевую идею Продукты не создаются из шаблонов, они

custom 53437268414274057129🔥7custom 52582037947720858544

23 Jan 2026, 16:42 UTC137 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Мой посыл не в том что не использовать ИИ, а в том что если мы выбираем человека за которым смотрим нам интересно его читать/смотреть/слушать и конечно же не хочется смотреть на ИИ Хочется человека живого, его мыслей идей, его такого как он есть А в противном случае зачем мы тогда занимаемся всем тем что делаем, для копипаста ИИ? Когда нет огня в глазах, делаешь через "надо", это же считывается и посты пустые считыв

🔥7custom 52582037947720858544custom 53437268414274057123🤔1

23 Jan 2026, 16:42 UTC110 viewsread 8 August 2026

Ну могла бы не ехать и сгенерировать через ИИ кадры на льду 😆😆😆

22 Jan 2026, 19:04 UTC116 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Неожиданный бонус от премии, о котором не пишут в рекламе Готовив презентацию я открыла для себя совершенно неочевидный, но возможно, самый ценный плюс участия. Я начала воспринимать себя и свою работу совершенно иначе Составление презентации открыло глаза на то, насколько все-таки круто то, что я делаю. Я по-новому увидела масштаб результатов, которые давала и глубину пользы, которую несла (моя скромность зашла в

🔥10custom 53437268414274057125custom 52582037947720858543

21 Jan 2026, 16:41 UTC97 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Просто оставлю это здесь На счёт того как звёзд уже подбешивает ИИ и что действительно важно В тему вчерашнего моего подкаста

custom 52582037947720858546custom 53437268414274057124

20 Jan 2026, 22:06 UTC84 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Voice message

Главный тренд 2026 года. Почему именно такие продукты будут продаваться Ох как я давно не записывала голосовые умные даже где-то потупила🤣 Не судите строго час ночи как никак😜 Слушаем внедряем и получаем удовольствие от результата Буду рада почитать ваши мысли по этому поводу и подискутировать

custom 53437268414274057127🔥5custom 52582037947720858544

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @luda_znaet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Евгения и Денис: Жизнь и путешествия.
@evgeniia_seredova · 22,158
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 21 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Главная по продукту | Людмила Коломацкая” (@luda_znaet), 456 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/luda_znaet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.