Insanity run in August, although we did it in another month early this year around Feb/March times You can still get in on the best group in the world, but I will be capping spots soon, meaning nobody will be able to join until somebody leaves. And it's unlikely anybody leaves this group If you want to join link is below Sublaunch.com/lucrativerackets Sublaunch.com/lucrativerackets Sublaunch.com/lucrativerackets

Channel
Lucrative Rackets FREE
@lucrativeracketsfree
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
340subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 1 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002139157552 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lucrativeracketsfree |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 27 January 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 1 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lucrativeracketsfree |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:00 | 340 | no change |
| 1 Sept 2026, 22:45 | 340 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 27 January 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 September 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 9
- Links
- 13
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 1 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
162 reactions across 18 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🖕 | 40 | 24.7% | |
| ❤ | 36 | 22.2% | |
| 👍 | 34 | 21.0% | |
| 🔥 | 14 | 8.64% | |
| 👎 | 6 | 3.70% | |
| 🤡 | 6 | 3.70% | |
| 🏆 | 5 | 3.09% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 3.09% | |
| 🥱 | 4 | 2.47% | |
| 🌭 | 2 | 1.23% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 1.23% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 1.23% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 1.23% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.617% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 0.617% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.617% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 0.617% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 162 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 January 2024 to 18 September 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
VISUAL REPRESENTATION OF OUR BETS IN AUGUST: ✅ 2u Corley/Corley to win +1.44 UNITS ✅ 2u Lock/R Da Silva to win +1.32 UNITS ✅ 2u Mott/Patton to win +2.00 UNITS ❌ 3u Bozemoj/Paardekooper to win -3 UNITS ❌ 1u Benjamin Hassan to win -1 UNITS ✅ 1u Diana Shnaider to win +1.1 UNITS ❌ 2u Gille/Vliegen to win -2 UNITS ✅ 2u Taylor Townsend to win +1.32 UNITS ✅ 1u Robin Montgomery Over 11.5 Games won +0.72 UNITS ✅ 1u Sebastian…
❤6👍1
We did it again on the Tennis…
👏3🖕1
Speaking of 9 bets in a row We are now 24 wins and 2 losses out of our last 26 bets 😂 insanity group I gave a bunch of FREE MONEY out when I first started this very group, in the form of free bets The smart ones signed up with that money and just hit 24 out of their last 26 bets The stupid ones didn’t sign up after the free period and lost out on heaps of money, till this day People complain they’re not rich bu…
🖕3❤2👍1🗿1
My Tennis group just hit 9 bets in a row It’s the best Tennis group on the planet IT IS NOT CLOSE And I truly mean that It has been absolutely pivotal in helping with downswings on other sports this year Literally a license to just print cash Sublaunch.com/lucrativerackets Sublaunch.com/lucrativerackets Sublaunch.com/lucrativerackets
❤2👎2🖕2💯1
BOOM ✅✅✅ We just cashed +240 underdogs in my Tennis group The best Tennis group in the world bar none, it’s not even close If you’re not in here already I don’t know what to tell you +130 unit year incoming 📈
🖕4🐳1🔥1
And cash this bet - Alex Michelsen over Reilly Opelka at -150 We literally haven’t stopped all year 😤
🖕2
Another bet coming to the best Tennis group on the web right now 👇💰 https://sublaunch.co/lucrativerackets https://sublaunch.co/lucrativerackets https://sublaunch.co/lucrativerackets
Just posted this in my Tennis group 👇 6 months of the year down so here is a recap of the results so far: Starting units: 100 units Current units: 166.5 units Bank growth: 66.5% Win percentage: 56.42% Average odds: 1.94 Average units risked: 1.49 Profit: +66.5 units 💰 ROI: +14.92% 💰 In my opinion this is the best Tennis group in the world. And it’s not even my opinion, the results show it. It’s also an extremely …
🤡4🎉2❤1🏆1🖕1
Have you joined the official Lucrative Rackets channel? We have decimated 2024, it’s been completely destroyed we’re at about 70 units of profit and it’s only been half of the year You already know how good the group is since you are in this group and cashed massively during its free period You can join for peanuts it’s below and keep cashing The group is FREE because you earn more money than it costs👇 https://s…
🥱3❤2👍1💯1
I’m giving away FREE MEMBERSHIPS to my Tennis Group 🎾💰 Read this Tweet to join for free👇 https://x.com/lucrativemma/status/1764451150961819903?s=46&t=laueMQvfcjBwT2t3X-5tBQ
❤2🔥1🫡1
Did you read the above message? This group is legit insanity lol
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lucrativeracketsfree. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@mattybetsspicks · 36,104
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Lucrative Rackets FREE” (@lucrativeracketsfree), 340 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lucrativeracketsfree.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.